Abstract 3752
Background
The expanding armamentarium of wearable devices offers new opportunities to supplement physician-assessed performance status (PS) with continuously acquired real-life patient data. It is relevant to identify and characterize the level of association between wearable device physical activity (PA) metrics and PS in cancer patients as a first step into evaluating their potential combined utility in evaluating treatment outcomes and clinical decisions. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review to examine the association between wearable device PA metrics and PS in cancer patients.
Methods
We searched PubMed and EMBASE for studies that were conducted among adults with cancer, quantitatively assessed a relation between wearable device PA metrics and PS, and had a full text available in English. We extracted information on study design and population, wearable device type and PA metrics, outcome definitions, and results. Included studies were subjected to methodological quality assessment.
Results
Nine studies with a total of 574 patients were included in this review. Eight studies had a prospective observational study design and all studies reported on a different combination of wearable device PA metrics including: steps per day (n = 5), sedentary behavior (n = 5), and PA volume/intensity (n = 4). Much heterogeneity was observed regarding study population, wearable devices used, and reporting of results. None of the studies could be defined to be of ‘high methodological quality’ (≥ 70%): mean methodological quality was 47% and ranged from 40-60%. We found moderate evidence for a positive association between steps per day and PS, and for a negative association between sedentary behavior and PS.
Conclusions
Much heterogeneity was identified between studies with regards to study population, reported PA metrics, and used devices. Nevertheless, results of this study indicate that higher daily step count is associated with better PS in cancer patients. Whereas sedentary behavior is associated with worse PS. The next step into determining their potential combined utility in evaluating treatment outcomes and clinical decisions is to investigate the association between wearable device PA metrics and cancer outcomes.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
H.W. Wilmink: Advisory / Consultancy: Shire; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Celgene; Research grant / Funding (institution): Servier; Research grant / Funding (institution): Halozyme; Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis; Research grant / Funding (institution): AstraZeneca; Research grant / Funding (institution): Pfizer; Research grant / Funding (institution): Roche; Research grant / Funding (institution): Merck. H.W.M. van Laarhoven: Research grant / Funding (institution): Roche; Research grant / Funding (institution): Bayer; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): BMS; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Celgene; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Lilly; Research grant / Funding (institution): Merck Serono; Research grant / Funding (institution): MSD; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Nordic; Research grant / Funding (institution): Philips. M. van Oijen: Research grant / Funding (institution): Roche; Research grant / Funding (institution): Lilly; Research grant / Funding (institution): Servier; Research grant / Funding (institution): Nordic; Research grant / Funding (institution): Amgen. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
5368 - Durvalumab and Paclitaxel Combination for treatment of metastatic triple negative breast cancer is safe with very promising efficacy
Presenter: Hazem Ghebeh
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1520 - A prospective cohort study on the pharmacokinetics of nivolumab in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer, melanoma, and renal cell cancer patients
Presenter: Daan Hurkmans
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1603 - Safety and clinical activity of subcutaneously (SC) administered anti-PD-1 antibody PF-06801591 in phase I dose-expansion cohorts of locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and urothelial carcinoma (UC)
Presenter: Byoung Cho
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3922 - Development of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Immune Checkpoint Modulator (FACT-ICM): A scale to measure quality of life in cancer patients treated with ICMs
Presenter: Aaron Hansen
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2408 - Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) as “chemotherapy (Ctx) sensitization” strategy in advanced solid tumors
Presenter: Francisco Javier Ros Montana
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3612 - Validation of progression-free survival (PFS) as surrogate endpoint in randomised trials of immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced solid cancers
Presenter: Peey Sei Kok
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3827 - Pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis of weight-based and fixed dose cemiplimab in patients (pts) with advanced malignancies
Presenter: Michael Migden
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2120 - A burst of highly differentiated CD4 TL identifies a subset of fast progressors, and correlates with hyperprogressive disease in NSCLC patients treated with ICI
Presenter: Hugo Arasanz
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4254 - Nivolumab treatment in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC): a French nationwide retrospective cohort (UNIVOC Study)
Presenter: Christos Chouaid
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1084 - Dissociated responses in patients with metastatic solid tumors treated with immunotherapy
Presenter: Pauline Vaflard
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract