Abstract 3752
Background
The expanding armamentarium of wearable devices offers new opportunities to supplement physician-assessed performance status (PS) with continuously acquired real-life patient data. It is relevant to identify and characterize the level of association between wearable device physical activity (PA) metrics and PS in cancer patients as a first step into evaluating their potential combined utility in evaluating treatment outcomes and clinical decisions. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review to examine the association between wearable device PA metrics and PS in cancer patients.
Methods
We searched PubMed and EMBASE for studies that were conducted among adults with cancer, quantitatively assessed a relation between wearable device PA metrics and PS, and had a full text available in English. We extracted information on study design and population, wearable device type and PA metrics, outcome definitions, and results. Included studies were subjected to methodological quality assessment.
Results
Nine studies with a total of 574 patients were included in this review. Eight studies had a prospective observational study design and all studies reported on a different combination of wearable device PA metrics including: steps per day (n = 5), sedentary behavior (n = 5), and PA volume/intensity (n = 4). Much heterogeneity was observed regarding study population, wearable devices used, and reporting of results. None of the studies could be defined to be of ‘high methodological quality’ (≥ 70%): mean methodological quality was 47% and ranged from 40-60%. We found moderate evidence for a positive association between steps per day and PS, and for a negative association between sedentary behavior and PS.
Conclusions
Much heterogeneity was identified between studies with regards to study population, reported PA metrics, and used devices. Nevertheless, results of this study indicate that higher daily step count is associated with better PS in cancer patients. Whereas sedentary behavior is associated with worse PS. The next step into determining their potential combined utility in evaluating treatment outcomes and clinical decisions is to investigate the association between wearable device PA metrics and cancer outcomes.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
H.W. Wilmink: Advisory / Consultancy: Shire; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Celgene; Research grant / Funding (institution): Servier; Research grant / Funding (institution): Halozyme; Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis; Research grant / Funding (institution): AstraZeneca; Research grant / Funding (institution): Pfizer; Research grant / Funding (institution): Roche; Research grant / Funding (institution): Merck. H.W.M. van Laarhoven: Research grant / Funding (institution): Roche; Research grant / Funding (institution): Bayer; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): BMS; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Celgene; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Lilly; Research grant / Funding (institution): Merck Serono; Research grant / Funding (institution): MSD; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Nordic; Research grant / Funding (institution): Philips. M. van Oijen: Research grant / Funding (institution): Roche; Research grant / Funding (institution): Lilly; Research grant / Funding (institution): Servier; Research grant / Funding (institution): Nordic; Research grant / Funding (institution): Amgen. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
5705 - External validation and longitudinal extension of the LIPI (Lung Immune Prognostic Index) for immunotherapy outcomes in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
Presenter: Jakob Riedl
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5758 - Changes of TCR Repertoire in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma and Metastatic Melanoma Patients Treated with Nivolumab
Presenter: Martin Klabusay
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1743 - Expression of MHC class I, HLA-A and HLA-B identifies immune activated breast tumors with favorable outcome
Presenter: María Del Mar Noblejas López
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2219 - Prognostic Significance of Tumor Tissue NeuGcGM3 Ganglioside Expression and Predictive Value of Circulating Tumor Cell Count Monitoring in Patients Receiving Racotumomab Immunotherapy
Presenter: Necdet Üskent
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2996 - Evolution of Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells and Objective Response Rate in Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma (R/R DLBCL) patients after receiving immunotherapy
Presenter: Carlos Jiménez Cortegana
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2110 - A Phase Ia/Ib trial of the anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) human monoclonal antibody (mAb), CS1001, in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors or lymphomas
Presenter: Lin Shen
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3515 - Results from a randomised Phase 1/2 trial evaluating the safety and antitumour activity of anti-PD-1 (MEDI0680)/anti-PD-L1 (durvalumab) vs anti-PD-1 (nivolumab) alone in metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC)
Presenter: Martin Voss
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3566 - Pembrolizumab in Advanced Rare Cancers
Presenter: Aung Naing
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3567 - High clinical benefit rates of pembrolizumab in very rare sarcoma histotypes: first results of the AcSé Pembrolizumab study
Presenter: Jean-Yves Blay
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2421 - Lenvatinib plus PD-1 blockade in advanced bile tract carcinoma.
Presenter: Jianzhen Lin
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract