Abstract 3752
Background
The expanding armamentarium of wearable devices offers new opportunities to supplement physician-assessed performance status (PS) with continuously acquired real-life patient data. It is relevant to identify and characterize the level of association between wearable device physical activity (PA) metrics and PS in cancer patients as a first step into evaluating their potential combined utility in evaluating treatment outcomes and clinical decisions. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review to examine the association between wearable device PA metrics and PS in cancer patients.
Methods
We searched PubMed and EMBASE for studies that were conducted among adults with cancer, quantitatively assessed a relation between wearable device PA metrics and PS, and had a full text available in English. We extracted information on study design and population, wearable device type and PA metrics, outcome definitions, and results. Included studies were subjected to methodological quality assessment.
Results
Nine studies with a total of 574 patients were included in this review. Eight studies had a prospective observational study design and all studies reported on a different combination of wearable device PA metrics including: steps per day (n = 5), sedentary behavior (n = 5), and PA volume/intensity (n = 4). Much heterogeneity was observed regarding study population, wearable devices used, and reporting of results. None of the studies could be defined to be of ‘high methodological quality’ (≥ 70%): mean methodological quality was 47% and ranged from 40-60%. We found moderate evidence for a positive association between steps per day and PS, and for a negative association between sedentary behavior and PS.
Conclusions
Much heterogeneity was identified between studies with regards to study population, reported PA metrics, and used devices. Nevertheless, results of this study indicate that higher daily step count is associated with better PS in cancer patients. Whereas sedentary behavior is associated with worse PS. The next step into determining their potential combined utility in evaluating treatment outcomes and clinical decisions is to investigate the association between wearable device PA metrics and cancer outcomes.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
H.W. Wilmink: Advisory / Consultancy: Shire; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Celgene; Research grant / Funding (institution): Servier; Research grant / Funding (institution): Halozyme; Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis; Research grant / Funding (institution): AstraZeneca; Research grant / Funding (institution): Pfizer; Research grant / Funding (institution): Roche; Research grant / Funding (institution): Merck. H.W.M. van Laarhoven: Research grant / Funding (institution): Roche; Research grant / Funding (institution): Bayer; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): BMS; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Celgene; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Lilly; Research grant / Funding (institution): Merck Serono; Research grant / Funding (institution): MSD; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Nordic; Research grant / Funding (institution): Philips. M. van Oijen: Research grant / Funding (institution): Roche; Research grant / Funding (institution): Lilly; Research grant / Funding (institution): Servier; Research grant / Funding (institution): Nordic; Research grant / Funding (institution): Amgen. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
4600 - Patterns and outcomes related to rapid progressive disease in a cohort of advanced solid tumors treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).
Presenter: Lucio Ghiglione
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3547 - Real World Outcomes of Immune-Related Adverse Events (irAEs) among Patients Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs) in Hospital Settings
Presenter: Saby George
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1124 - Sex-based heterogeneity of efficacy of anticancer immunotherapy
Presenter: Fabio Conforti
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4133 - Comparative efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors for patients with solid tumors: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis
Presenter: Qingyuan Huang
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2548 - Excess weight and efficacy of anti-PD-1 antibodies in advanced cancer patients
Presenter: Jacobo Rogado
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2228 - Safety and efficacy of anti-PD-1 inhibitor ABBV-181 in lung and head and neck carcinoma
Presenter: Antoine Italiano
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2333 - Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for treatment of advanced solid tumours in octogenarian patients
Presenter: Soraya Mebarki
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4847 - Association of programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) inhibitor therapy with overall survival (OS) in stage IV melanoma treated with targeted therapies
Presenter: Aracelis Torres
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2215 - Clinical outcomes of immune checkpoint inhibitors in older and younger patients with advanced solid tumours in a real-life setting
Presenter: Pauline Corbaux
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2881 - Impact of corticosteroids and antibiotics on efficacy of immune-checkpoint inhibitors in advanced non-small cell lung cancer
Presenter: Joaquin Mosquera Martinez
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract