Abstract 1312
Background
Predictive online calculators are used by clinicians as decision aids in early breast cancer (EBC). While use statistics for these calculators have not been published, as of 2017 NHS Predict was being accessed more than 20,000 times a month. These predictive tools have not had accuracy & benefit of use prospectively confirmed in EBC, yet use of calculators has been encouraged in EBC guidelines. It is important to understand the populations informing model development & validation, to understand how data bias may impact predictions in under-represented subpopulations. This work sought to elucidate the risk of bias in model development & validation for 3 online EBC calculators (NHS Predict, Adjuvant! & Cancermath), in an effort to highlight sub-populations where calculated risk & therefore treatment benefit estimates may be less reliable.
Methods
A literature search was conducted in PubMed, search terms were “predict*” “adjuvant” “breast” & “algorithm”. Results were screened for relevance to the three predictive tools under scrutiny & additional references were extracted from relevant papers. Using a modified CHARMS checklist, the relevant sections of the development & validation papers were extracted.
Results
6 development & 24 validation papers were reviewed as summarised in the TableTable:
264P
Predict | Adjuvant | Cancermath | |
---|---|---|---|
Development population size & date range | 5694 1977-2008 | 37,968 1977-2007 | 499,724 1977-2007 |
Aged <35 in development population | 2% (111) | 0 | >0.5% |
Aged >65 in development population | 32% (1781) | 0 | >17% |
Tumour size >5cm in development population | 5% (287) | 0 | 0 |
Number of validation studies | 10 | 13 | 3 |
% retrospective | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Total number of patients in validation studies | 19,864 | 19,618 | 11,203 |
Age >65 in validations | 35% (7134) | 42% (8313) | 40% (4519) |
Age <35 in validations | 16% (3235) | 8% (1518) | 9% (1007) |
Tumour size >5cm in validations | 5% (287) | 5% (1015) | 6% (634) |
Universal exclusions | Multi-focal, inflammatory, male | Multi-focal, inflammatory, male | Multi-focal, inflammatory, male |
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy not an exclusion | 1 study (121 patients) | 0 | 0 |
Overall conclusions of validation authors | Earlier versions under-predicted mortality in women <35 Poor performance in tumours >5cm. | Poor performance in general in: <35 and >65 More advanced disease Malay ethnicity Overly optimistic survival predictions across subgroups in UK population. | Poor performance in < 35 Systematically under-predicted mortality, especially for ER-negative tumours. |
Conclusions
All 3 predictive tools have under-represented groups in their development cohorts, specifically those under 35 & over 65 years old, as well as larger tumours. Validation studies consistently demonstrate worse performance in these groups. However, due to inconsistent methodology in validation studies, quantitating the summary performance within & across tools is difficult. These predictive tools should be used with caution in under-represented populations. More work is required to look at clinical utility of tools as well as their statistical performance.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
3879 - Efficacy of derazantinib (DZB) in patients (pts) with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) expressing FGFR2-fusion or FGFR2 mutations/amplifications
Presenter: Michele Droz Dit Busset
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4679 - It’s Not Only About Weight Loss: Tackling Pancreatic Cancer-Associated Cachexia
Presenter: Ana Leonor Matos
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2276 - Frequency and clinicopathological characteristics of biliary tract carcinomas harboring the FGFR2-fusion gene: a prospective observational study (PRELUDE study)
Presenter: Masafumi Ikeda
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2773 - Post-hoc analyses of a subgroup of patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) who crossed over to treatment with etoposide toniribate (EDO-S7.1) in a randomized Phase II study
Presenter: Ulrich-Frank Pape
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4479 - Capecitabine +Best supportive care (BSC) or Erlotinib +BSC has Overall survival (OS) benefit over BSC alone in unresectable/metastatic Gall bladder cancer(GBC) patients with ECOG PS-III. Results from a phase II Randomised controlled trial (RCT)
Presenter: Babita Kataria
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4843 - FGFR2 fusions and its effect of patient (pt) outcomes in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA)
Presenter: Daniel Almquist
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2324 - The Clinical Outcomes of Systemic Chemotherapy in Patients with Unresectable or Metastatic Combined Hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (HCC-CCA): Retrospective Study of 120 Patients
Presenter: Eojin Kim
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3678 - High PD-L1 expression is associated with treatment response to pembrolizumab in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer.
Presenter: Gilhyang Kim
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3901 - Genomic profiling in Chinese biliary tract cancer patients with PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway and RAS gene mutations
Presenter: Jingyu Cao
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4390 - Phase II trial of trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) in patients with advanced refractory biliary tract cancer (BTC)
Presenter: Sakti Chakrabarti
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract