Abstract 1312
Background
Predictive online calculators are used by clinicians as decision aids in early breast cancer (EBC). While use statistics for these calculators have not been published, as of 2017 NHS Predict was being accessed more than 20,000 times a month. These predictive tools have not had accuracy & benefit of use prospectively confirmed in EBC, yet use of calculators has been encouraged in EBC guidelines. It is important to understand the populations informing model development & validation, to understand how data bias may impact predictions in under-represented subpopulations. This work sought to elucidate the risk of bias in model development & validation for 3 online EBC calculators (NHS Predict, Adjuvant! & Cancermath), in an effort to highlight sub-populations where calculated risk & therefore treatment benefit estimates may be less reliable.
Methods
A literature search was conducted in PubMed, search terms were “predict*” “adjuvant” “breast” & “algorithm”. Results were screened for relevance to the three predictive tools under scrutiny & additional references were extracted from relevant papers. Using a modified CHARMS checklist, the relevant sections of the development & validation papers were extracted.
Results
6 development & 24 validation papers were reviewed as summarised in the TableTable:
264P
Predict | Adjuvant | Cancermath | |
---|---|---|---|
Development population size & date range | 5694 1977-2008 | 37,968 1977-2007 | 499,724 1977-2007 |
Aged <35 in development population | 2% (111) | 0 | >0.5% |
Aged >65 in development population | 32% (1781) | 0 | >17% |
Tumour size >5cm in development population | 5% (287) | 0 | 0 |
Number of validation studies | 10 | 13 | 3 |
% retrospective | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Total number of patients in validation studies | 19,864 | 19,618 | 11,203 |
Age >65 in validations | 35% (7134) | 42% (8313) | 40% (4519) |
Age <35 in validations | 16% (3235) | 8% (1518) | 9% (1007) |
Tumour size >5cm in validations | 5% (287) | 5% (1015) | 6% (634) |
Universal exclusions | Multi-focal, inflammatory, male | Multi-focal, inflammatory, male | Multi-focal, inflammatory, male |
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy not an exclusion | 1 study (121 patients) | 0 | 0 |
Overall conclusions of validation authors | Earlier versions under-predicted mortality in women <35 Poor performance in tumours >5cm. | Poor performance in general in: <35 and >65 More advanced disease Malay ethnicity Overly optimistic survival predictions across subgroups in UK population. | Poor performance in < 35 Systematically under-predicted mortality, especially for ER-negative tumours. |
Conclusions
All 3 predictive tools have under-represented groups in their development cohorts, specifically those under 35 & over 65 years old, as well as larger tumours. Validation studies consistently demonstrate worse performance in these groups. However, due to inconsistent methodology in validation studies, quantitating the summary performance within & across tools is difficult. These predictive tools should be used with caution in under-represented populations. More work is required to look at clinical utility of tools as well as their statistical performance.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
3139 - Efficacy and safety of FOLFIRI/Aflibercept (FA) in elderly population with mCRC after failure of oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy.
Presenter: Nieves Martinez Lago
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3446 - Fluoropyrimidine-induced cardiotoxicity in colorectal cancer patients: preliminary data from the prospective observational CHECKPOINT trial (NCT02665312)
Presenter: Pasquale Lombardi
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3969 - Comparable survival outcome between Thai patients with sporadic young adult and adult onset colorectal cancer
Presenter: Kanjana Sukhokanjanachusak
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4455 - Impact of primary tumor side on 3-year survival outcomes of first-line (1L) FOLFOX-4 ± cetuximab in patients with RAS wild-type (wt) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in the phase 3 TAILOR trial
Presenter: Shukui Qin
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4481 - Undetectable RAS mutant clones in plasma: possible implication for therapy and prognosis in the patient with RAS mutant metastatic colorectal cancer?
Presenter: Mohamed Bouchahda
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5074 - Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) determination prior the administration of medicines containing fluorouracil: a single Spanish hospital experience.
Presenter: Maria Dolores Mediano Rambla
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5242 - Differences in survival between right and left-sided colorrectal cancer (CRC) in every stage, a CARESS-CCR Group Study.
Presenter: Julia Alcaide-Garcia
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1123 - Quality of Life (QoL) in patients with aflibercept (AFL) and FOLFIRI for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) – Interim analysis with focus on mutational status of the non-interventional study QoLiTrap (AIO-LQ-0113)
Presenter: Roger von Moos
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1212 - The cost of adverse event management in patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer treated with first-line cetuximab and panitumumab: an Italian healthcare payer perspective
Presenter: Karl Patterson
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1619 - Meta-analysis of KRAS Mutation as prognostic factor in patients (pts.) with resection of colorectal (CRC) liver metastases: Tumor burden and Sideness analysis.
Presenter: Maria Romina Luca
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract