Abstract 1312
Background
Predictive online calculators are used by clinicians as decision aids in early breast cancer (EBC). While use statistics for these calculators have not been published, as of 2017 NHS Predict was being accessed more than 20,000 times a month. These predictive tools have not had accuracy & benefit of use prospectively confirmed in EBC, yet use of calculators has been encouraged in EBC guidelines. It is important to understand the populations informing model development & validation, to understand how data bias may impact predictions in under-represented subpopulations. This work sought to elucidate the risk of bias in model development & validation for 3 online EBC calculators (NHS Predict, Adjuvant! & Cancermath), in an effort to highlight sub-populations where calculated risk & therefore treatment benefit estimates may be less reliable.
Methods
A literature search was conducted in PubMed, search terms were “predict*” “adjuvant” “breast” & “algorithm”. Results were screened for relevance to the three predictive tools under scrutiny & additional references were extracted from relevant papers. Using a modified CHARMS checklist, the relevant sections of the development & validation papers were extracted.
Results
6 development & 24 validation papers were reviewed as summarised in the TableTable:
264P
Predict | Adjuvant | Cancermath | |
---|---|---|---|
Development population size & date range | 5694 1977-2008 | 37,968 1977-2007 | 499,724 1977-2007 |
Aged <35 in development population | 2% (111) | 0 | >0.5% |
Aged >65 in development population | 32% (1781) | 0 | >17% |
Tumour size >5cm in development population | 5% (287) | 0 | 0 |
Number of validation studies | 10 | 13 | 3 |
% retrospective | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Total number of patients in validation studies | 19,864 | 19,618 | 11,203 |
Age >65 in validations | 35% (7134) | 42% (8313) | 40% (4519) |
Age <35 in validations | 16% (3235) | 8% (1518) | 9% (1007) |
Tumour size >5cm in validations | 5% (287) | 5% (1015) | 6% (634) |
Universal exclusions | Multi-focal, inflammatory, male | Multi-focal, inflammatory, male | Multi-focal, inflammatory, male |
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy not an exclusion | 1 study (121 patients) | 0 | 0 |
Overall conclusions of validation authors | Earlier versions under-predicted mortality in women <35 Poor performance in tumours >5cm. | Poor performance in general in: <35 and >65 More advanced disease Malay ethnicity Overly optimistic survival predictions across subgroups in UK population. | Poor performance in < 35 Systematically under-predicted mortality, especially for ER-negative tumours. |
Conclusions
All 3 predictive tools have under-represented groups in their development cohorts, specifically those under 35 & over 65 years old, as well as larger tumours. Validation studies consistently demonstrate worse performance in these groups. However, due to inconsistent methodology in validation studies, quantitating the summary performance within & across tools is difficult. These predictive tools should be used with caution in under-represented populations. More work is required to look at clinical utility of tools as well as their statistical performance.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
3082 - Prognostic and predictive role of body mass index (BMI) in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): a pooled analisys of TRIBE and TRIBE-2 studies by GONO
Presenter: Emanuela Dell'Aquila
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3618 - Drug holidays and overall survival in patients treated for metastatic colorectal cancer
Presenter: Silvio Ken Garattini
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
6111 - Quality of life during 1st-line FOLFOXIRI+/- panitumumab in RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: Results from the randomized VOLFI trial (AIO KRK-0109)
Presenter: Michael Geissler
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1042 - A biomarker combination indicating resistance to FOLFOX plus bevacizumab in metastastic colorectal cancer : results of phase I of the PERMAD trial
Presenter: Thomas Seufferlein
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3291 - Microsatellite Instability (MSI) status and prognosis in colorectal cancer: meta-analysis
Presenter: James Toh
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2046 - Choosing the right strategy based on individualized treatment effect predictions: Combination versus sequential chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Presenter: Miriam Koopman
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2589 - Noninferiority on overall survival of every-2-weeks vs weekly schedule of cetuximab for first-line treatment of RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer
Presenter: Stefan Kasper
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4944 - POLAF study: Efficacy and safety of FOLFIRI/aflibercept in a phase II trial in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: Results of plasmatic prognostic and predictive markers
Presenter: Maria Elena Elez Fernandez
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2042 - The accuracy of the clinical PCI score in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal cancer
Presenter: Nadine De Boer
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2667 - The impact of late-line treatment on overall survival (OS) from the initiation of first-line chemotherapy (CT) for patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).
Presenter: Takeshi Kawakami
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract