Abstract 1312
Background
Predictive online calculators are used by clinicians as decision aids in early breast cancer (EBC). While use statistics for these calculators have not been published, as of 2017 NHS Predict was being accessed more than 20,000 times a month. These predictive tools have not had accuracy & benefit of use prospectively confirmed in EBC, yet use of calculators has been encouraged in EBC guidelines. It is important to understand the populations informing model development & validation, to understand how data bias may impact predictions in under-represented subpopulations. This work sought to elucidate the risk of bias in model development & validation for 3 online EBC calculators (NHS Predict, Adjuvant! & Cancermath), in an effort to highlight sub-populations where calculated risk & therefore treatment benefit estimates may be less reliable.
Methods
A literature search was conducted in PubMed, search terms were “predict*” “adjuvant” “breast” & “algorithm”. Results were screened for relevance to the three predictive tools under scrutiny & additional references were extracted from relevant papers. Using a modified CHARMS checklist, the relevant sections of the development & validation papers were extracted.
Results
6 development & 24 validation papers were reviewed as summarised in the TableTable:
264P
Predict | Adjuvant | Cancermath | |
---|---|---|---|
Development population size & date range | 5694 1977-2008 | 37,968 1977-2007 | 499,724 1977-2007 |
Aged <35 in development population | 2% (111) | 0 | >0.5% |
Aged >65 in development population | 32% (1781) | 0 | >17% |
Tumour size >5cm in development population | 5% (287) | 0 | 0 |
Number of validation studies | 10 | 13 | 3 |
% retrospective | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Total number of patients in validation studies | 19,864 | 19,618 | 11,203 |
Age >65 in validations | 35% (7134) | 42% (8313) | 40% (4519) |
Age <35 in validations | 16% (3235) | 8% (1518) | 9% (1007) |
Tumour size >5cm in validations | 5% (287) | 5% (1015) | 6% (634) |
Universal exclusions | Multi-focal, inflammatory, male | Multi-focal, inflammatory, male | Multi-focal, inflammatory, male |
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy not an exclusion | 1 study (121 patients) | 0 | 0 |
Overall conclusions of validation authors | Earlier versions under-predicted mortality in women <35 Poor performance in tumours >5cm. | Poor performance in general in: <35 and >65 More advanced disease Malay ethnicity Overly optimistic survival predictions across subgroups in UK population. | Poor performance in < 35 Systematically under-predicted mortality, especially for ER-negative tumours. |
Conclusions
All 3 predictive tools have under-represented groups in their development cohorts, specifically those under 35 & over 65 years old, as well as larger tumours. Validation studies consistently demonstrate worse performance in these groups. However, due to inconsistent methodology in validation studies, quantitating the summary performance within & across tools is difficult. These predictive tools should be used with caution in under-represented populations. More work is required to look at clinical utility of tools as well as their statistical performance.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
4581 - Timing to achieve complete response (CR) after definitive chemoradiotherapy (ChRT) in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the anal (SCCAC) with and without HIV infection: a multicenter retrospective study
Presenter: Marcos Camandaroba
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1712 - Planned organ preservation for T2 T3 M0 rectal adenocarcinoma. A possible option using chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and Contact X-ray Brachytherapy (CXB). A French multicenter study.
Presenter: Jean-Pierre Gérard
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4639 - A Phase 1b Study of E7046 (AN0025) in Combination With Radiotherapy/Chemoradiotherapy (RT/CRT) in Preoperative Treatment of Rectal Cancer
Presenter: Lucjan Wyrwicz
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2310 - Upfront radical surgery with total mesorectal excision (TME) versus preoperative chemoradiotherapy followed by TME in clinical stage II/III patients with rectal cancer: a propensity score analysis
Presenter: Ahrong Ham
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2747 - Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with/without lateral lymph node dissection for low rectal cancer: Which patients can benefit?
Presenter: Daisuke Nishizaki
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2877 - The impact of completeness of chemotherapy on the efficacy of irinotecan in the preoperative chemoradiotherapy of locally advanced rectal cancer.
Presenter: Jingwen Wang
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3050 - Feasibility of robot-assisted surgery in elderly patients with rectal cancer
Presenter: Wei-Chih Su
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4109 - Feasibility of chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer patients with peritumoral abscesses and fistulas: a case-control non-inferiority trial
Presenter: Valerii Ivanov
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4813 - Differential of the nutritional index before and after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy as a prognostic factor of recurrence in patients with locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the rectum
Presenter: Leslie Navia-Ortuño
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5345 - Short-term Clinical Outcomes of Robotic-Assisted Total Mesorectal Excision in Rectal Cancer after concurrent chemoradiotherapy
Presenter: Pojung Chen
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract