Abstract 4139
Background
Selecting which pts may benefit from ieCTs is challenging. Few prognostic indexes have been proposed so far and none qualifying as a predictor of response. The Gustave Roussy Immune Score (GRImS) identifies two prognostic categories based on three objective variables (albumin<3.5 g/dL=1; LDH>ULN=1; NLR>6=1).
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed data of all pts enrolled into ieCTs at the Humanitas Cancer Center Phase I Unit between 2014 and 2019. A large series of demographic and clinical variables were correlated with overall survival (OS) and objective response rate (ORR) through univariate and multivariate analysis (UVA; MVA). Laboratory parameters were calculated either as baseline values and as dynamic six-weeks (6wks) changes. Finally, we explored the performance of the GRImS in our cohort.
Results
A total of 111 pts (M/F:63/48; median age: 62) with advanced solid tumors treated into ieCTs have been selected. The most frequent histologies were hepatocellular carcinoma (34%), lung carcinoma (22%), glioblastomas (13%). With a median follow-up (FU) of 14.3 months (mos), the OS was 12.9 mos, and the ORR 12.6%. In the UVA ECOG PS < 1 (HR = 0.53; IC 0.30-0.94; p = 0.030) and higher baseline value of albumin (HR = 0.40; IC 0.21-0.77; p = 0.006) were significantly associated with a better OS, while baseline total protein level (OR = 1.47; IC 1.24 - 2.10; p = 0.030), and increase in lymphocytes count at 6wks (OR = 1.02; IC 1.00-1.04; p = 0.029) were predictive of response. In the MVA only higher baseline value of albumin seems to confirm its independent prognostic value (HR = 0.48; IC 0.23-1.01; p = 0.054), as well as baseline total protein level its predictive role (OR = 1.52; IC 1-2.33; p = 0.052). The GRImS resulted prognostic, with pts at low-risk (≤1) having a significant better OS compared to pts with a high-risk score (>1) (14.3 mos vs 7.3 mos; p = 0.029), but not predictive.
Conclusions
We assessed the prognostic accuracy of GRImS in our ieCTs cohort. With limitations due to small sample size, short FU and few events recorded we identified additional static and dynamic variables with a potential prognostic and predictive relevance to be further explored in larger series and to be eventually included in new scores.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
M. Simonelli: Advisory / Consultancy: AbbVie. A. Santoro: Advisory / Consultancy: Bristol-Myers-Squibb; Advisory / Consultancy: Servier; Advisory / Consultancy: Gilead; Advisory / Consultancy: Pfizer; Advisory / Consultancy: Eisai; Advisory / Consultancy: Bayer; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck Sharp & Dohme; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Takeda; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Bristol-Myers-Squibb; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Roche; Speaker Bureau / Expert Testimony: Abbvie; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Amgen; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Celgene; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Servier; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Gilead; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: AstraZeneca; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Pfizer; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Arqule; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Lilly; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: SANDOZ. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
4852 - Impact of routine screening and preemptive treatment on hepatitis B virus reactivation (HBVr) in patients receiving chemotherapy
Presenter: Celine Marty
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5225 - The uptake, patient satisfaction and efficacy of scalp cooling among patients receiving chemotherapy in an Irish oncology day ward.
Presenter: William Maher
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1901 - Placebo adverse events (AEs) in targeted and immune cancer therapy in the adjuvant and advanced setting: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Diego Enrico
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3258 - Reduced antibody levels and high seronegativity rates against vaccine preventable diseases pose a risk factor for infections in patients with solid and hematologic cancers
Presenter: Angela Guzek
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3211 - Prognostic Factors Influencing Outcome After Therapy With Brentuximab Vedotin in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Hodgkin's Lymphoma
Presenter: Veselina Goranova - Marinova
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4949 - Phase I Study of CC-90010 in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors and Relapsed/Refractory Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (R/R NHL)
Presenter: Victor Moreno
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2271 - Pretreatment coagulation factors related to prognosis in patients with natural killer/T cell lymphoma
Presenter: Yue Chai
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4335 - Diffuse large B cell lymphoma in the elderly. A retrospective analysis of standard versus alternative treatments
Presenter: Irene Sillero
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5117 - MIPI as a superior prognostic tool in Mantle Cell Lymphoma compared to monocyte-lymphocyte, neutrophil-lymphocyte and platelet-lymphocyte ratios
Presenter: Filipa Macedo
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5135 - Dose adjustment of chemotherapy in aggressive lymphoma using automated and standardized analysis and evaluation of DNA double strand breaks
Presenter: Julia Schröder
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract