Abstract 4139
Background
Selecting which pts may benefit from ieCTs is challenging. Few prognostic indexes have been proposed so far and none qualifying as a predictor of response. The Gustave Roussy Immune Score (GRImS) identifies two prognostic categories based on three objective variables (albumin<3.5 g/dL=1; LDH>ULN=1; NLR>6=1).
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed data of all pts enrolled into ieCTs at the Humanitas Cancer Center Phase I Unit between 2014 and 2019. A large series of demographic and clinical variables were correlated with overall survival (OS) and objective response rate (ORR) through univariate and multivariate analysis (UVA; MVA). Laboratory parameters were calculated either as baseline values and as dynamic six-weeks (6wks) changes. Finally, we explored the performance of the GRImS in our cohort.
Results
A total of 111 pts (M/F:63/48; median age: 62) with advanced solid tumors treated into ieCTs have been selected. The most frequent histologies were hepatocellular carcinoma (34%), lung carcinoma (22%), glioblastomas (13%). With a median follow-up (FU) of 14.3 months (mos), the OS was 12.9 mos, and the ORR 12.6%. In the UVA ECOG PS < 1 (HR = 0.53; IC 0.30-0.94; p = 0.030) and higher baseline value of albumin (HR = 0.40; IC 0.21-0.77; p = 0.006) were significantly associated with a better OS, while baseline total protein level (OR = 1.47; IC 1.24 - 2.10; p = 0.030), and increase in lymphocytes count at 6wks (OR = 1.02; IC 1.00-1.04; p = 0.029) were predictive of response. In the MVA only higher baseline value of albumin seems to confirm its independent prognostic value (HR = 0.48; IC 0.23-1.01; p = 0.054), as well as baseline total protein level its predictive role (OR = 1.52; IC 1-2.33; p = 0.052). The GRImS resulted prognostic, with pts at low-risk (≤1) having a significant better OS compared to pts with a high-risk score (>1) (14.3 mos vs 7.3 mos; p = 0.029), but not predictive.
Conclusions
We assessed the prognostic accuracy of GRImS in our ieCTs cohort. With limitations due to small sample size, short FU and few events recorded we identified additional static and dynamic variables with a potential prognostic and predictive relevance to be further explored in larger series and to be eventually included in new scores.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
M. Simonelli: Advisory / Consultancy: AbbVie. A. Santoro: Advisory / Consultancy: Bristol-Myers-Squibb; Advisory / Consultancy: Servier; Advisory / Consultancy: Gilead; Advisory / Consultancy: Pfizer; Advisory / Consultancy: Eisai; Advisory / Consultancy: Bayer; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck Sharp & Dohme; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Takeda; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Bristol-Myers-Squibb; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Roche; Speaker Bureau / Expert Testimony: Abbvie; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Amgen; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Celgene; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Servier; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Gilead; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: AstraZeneca; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Pfizer; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Arqule; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Lilly; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: SANDOZ. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
4294 - The Patient Voice: An Irish Survey of Nutrition Attitudes & Access to Dietetic Care Throughout the Cancer Journey
Presenter: Erin Stella Sullivan
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1925 - Homcology: home chemotherapy delivery in a simultaneous care project for frail advanced cancer patients
Presenter: Claudio Chini
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4701 - Treatment-related adverse events and tolerability in patients with advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer treated with first-line checkpoint inhibitors in combination with chemotherapy
Presenter: Ruth D'cunha
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2985 - Clinical utility of a systematic toxicity assessment form (STAF) in patients with breast cancer receiving adjuvant or neoadjuvant therapy.
Presenter: Jwa Hoon Kim
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2358 - Physicians’ satisfaction with Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) assessment in daily clinical practice using electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) for cancer patients.
Presenter: Guillaume Mouillet
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5172 - Predictors of Survival in Patients with Incurable Cancer
Presenter: Erin Stella Sullivan
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2281 - Patients and Physicians' Satisfaction with Telemedicine (TM) in Cancer Care and Factors that Correlate with a Positive Patient’s Experience
Presenter: Hurria Gondal
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2193 - Adherence to ESMO 2014 guidelines on bone-targeting agent (BTA) initiation for breast and prostate cancer patients: real-world insights from practicing European physicians
Presenter: Alex Rider
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2200 - Use of skeletal-related events preventive agents in patients with solid tumours and bone metastases in central Denmark
Presenter: Anders Boysen
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2504 - Inadequacy of current definition and staging system of Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of Jaw (MRONJ) released by AAOMS : a Computed Tomography study in 151 cancer and myeloma patients
Presenter: Vittorio Fusco
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract