Abstract 4139
Background
Selecting which pts may benefit from ieCTs is challenging. Few prognostic indexes have been proposed so far and none qualifying as a predictor of response. The Gustave Roussy Immune Score (GRImS) identifies two prognostic categories based on three objective variables (albumin<3.5 g/dL=1; LDH>ULN=1; NLR>6=1).
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed data of all pts enrolled into ieCTs at the Humanitas Cancer Center Phase I Unit between 2014 and 2019. A large series of demographic and clinical variables were correlated with overall survival (OS) and objective response rate (ORR) through univariate and multivariate analysis (UVA; MVA). Laboratory parameters were calculated either as baseline values and as dynamic six-weeks (6wks) changes. Finally, we explored the performance of the GRImS in our cohort.
Results
A total of 111 pts (M/F:63/48; median age: 62) with advanced solid tumors treated into ieCTs have been selected. The most frequent histologies were hepatocellular carcinoma (34%), lung carcinoma (22%), glioblastomas (13%). With a median follow-up (FU) of 14.3 months (mos), the OS was 12.9 mos, and the ORR 12.6%. In the UVA ECOG PS < 1 (HR = 0.53; IC 0.30-0.94; p = 0.030) and higher baseline value of albumin (HR = 0.40; IC 0.21-0.77; p = 0.006) were significantly associated with a better OS, while baseline total protein level (OR = 1.47; IC 1.24 - 2.10; p = 0.030), and increase in lymphocytes count at 6wks (OR = 1.02; IC 1.00-1.04; p = 0.029) were predictive of response. In the MVA only higher baseline value of albumin seems to confirm its independent prognostic value (HR = 0.48; IC 0.23-1.01; p = 0.054), as well as baseline total protein level its predictive role (OR = 1.52; IC 1-2.33; p = 0.052). The GRImS resulted prognostic, with pts at low-risk (≤1) having a significant better OS compared to pts with a high-risk score (>1) (14.3 mos vs 7.3 mos; p = 0.029), but not predictive.
Conclusions
We assessed the prognostic accuracy of GRImS in our ieCTs cohort. With limitations due to small sample size, short FU and few events recorded we identified additional static and dynamic variables with a potential prognostic and predictive relevance to be further explored in larger series and to be eventually included in new scores.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
M. Simonelli: Advisory / Consultancy: AbbVie. A. Santoro: Advisory / Consultancy: Bristol-Myers-Squibb; Advisory / Consultancy: Servier; Advisory / Consultancy: Gilead; Advisory / Consultancy: Pfizer; Advisory / Consultancy: Eisai; Advisory / Consultancy: Bayer; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck Sharp & Dohme; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Takeda; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Bristol-Myers-Squibb; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Roche; Speaker Bureau / Expert Testimony: Abbvie; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Amgen; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Celgene; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Servier; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Gilead; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: AstraZeneca; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Pfizer; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Arqule; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Lilly; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: SANDOZ. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
3993 - Prophylaxis with Lipegfilgrastim in patients with primary breast cancer receiving dose dense chemotherapy: results from the German NIS NADENS
Presenter: Marion Kiechle
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3471 - Randomized phase 2 trial evaluating the safety of peripherally inserted central catheters vs implanted port catheters during adjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer patients.
Presenter: Florian Clatot
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1327 - Simultaneous intravenous fluid infusion to prevent oxaliplatin infusion-related venous pain
Presenter: Stefan Van Ravensteijn
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5004 - Clinical practice evaluation of opioids induced constipation management in cancer patients: The EIO-Praxis project.
Presenter: Enrique Aranda Aguilar
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2222 - Analysis of the efficacy of naloxegol in a real-world 12 weeks of follow-up study, in patients with cancer and opioid-induced constipation with laxative-inadequate response.
Presenter: Manuel Cobo Dols
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5556 - Consensus on strategies in the management of opioid-induced constipation in cancer patients
Presenter: Regina Girones Sarrio
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3913 - Effect of Chinese Herbal Compound LC09 on Patients With Capecitabine-Associated Hand-Foot Syndrome: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial
Presenter: Yanni Lou
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2208 - A prospective study about the complementary medicine among patients with cancers
Presenter: Wala Ben Kridis
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1082 - Prevalence and management of Potentially Inappropriate Medication use and Potential Omissions in Medication in older cancer patients - the PIM POM study
Presenter: Fianne van Loveren
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1701 - Immunogenicity and optimal timing of 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccination during adjuvant chemotherapy in gastric and colorectal cancer : A randomized controlled trial
Presenter: Wonyoung Choi
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract