Abstract 2196
Background
Despite decades of research, performance of DPYD genotyping to predict FP toxicity (tox) is poorly documented. GPCO-UNICANCER and RNPGx groups initiated the FUSAFE MA on individual patient data (IPD) to assess the prognostic value of consensual deleterious DPYD variants on grade (G) 4-5 FP tox.
Methods
Eligibility criteria included unbiased recruitment of Caucasian patients (pts) without FP dose adjustment based on DPD status. Main endpoint was 12 weeks hematological or digestive G4-5 tox. Age, sex, body mass index (BMI), advanced stage (M- vs M+), FP drug (5FU vs capecitabine), FP administration (bolus±continuous vs continuous alone or p.o.) and associated anticancer drugs (AAD) were collected. Multivariable logistic models were applied. Performance was assessed by AUC and diagnostic indices maximizing Youden index.
Results
From the 18 identified eligible studies (10230 pts), 14 were included (9030 pts), with complete IPD collected for 6403 pts (84% colorectal, 16% M+, 66% 5FU, 80% AAD). G4-5 tox prevalence was 8% (518 events). DPYD variants *2A, D949V, *13 and HapB3 were carried by 0.9%, 1.2%, 0.2% and 3.9% of pts, respectively. The clinical model (M1) retained age, sex, BMI, FP-administration, AAD. Adding variants *2A/D949V/*13 (at least one mutated allele) significantly (p<.0001) improved the model (M2). Further adding HapB3 did not improve the model (p=.24, M3). M3-adjusted OR (95%CI) was 10.0 (6.9-14.7) for the 3 variants *2A/D949V/*13 and 2.1 (1.4-3.0) for HapB3. Similar results were observed on colorectal pts only, or when excluding bolus administration alone.Table:
569P
Model | AUC (area under the curve) | Sensitivity | Specificity | Positive predictive value | Negative predictive value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
M1 | 0.725 | 69.7% | 65.4% | 15.1% | 96.1% |
M2 | 0.750 | 75.5% | 62.8% | 15.2% | 96.7% |
M3 | 0.752 | 76.4% | 61.9% | 15.0% | 96.8% |
Conclusions
This is the largest MA on DPYD genotyping and toxicity. It shows the relevance of clinical variables and of the 3 consensual DPYD variants. Despite its association with tox, HapB3 does not improve the discriminant ability to identify pts at risk of G4-5 toxicity.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France (Dr Marie-Christine Etienne-Grimaldi, coordinator).
Funding
French Cancer Institute (INCa) funding (PHRC-K 14-193 FUSAFE) and French Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer.
Disclosure
V. Boige: Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (self), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Merck Serono; Honoraria (self): Amgen; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Bayer; Honoraria (self), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Roche Genentech; Honoraria (self): MSD; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Ipsen; Advisory / Consultancy: Prestizia; Advisory / Consultancy: Eisai; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Sanofi. J. Taieb: Advisory / Consultancy: Amgen; Advisory / Consultancy: Lily; Advisory / Consultancy: Sanofi; Advisory / Consultancy: Roche; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck; Advisory / Consultancy: MSD; Advisory / Consultancy: Celgene; Advisory / Consultancy: Servier; Advisory / Consultancy: Sirtex; Advisory / Consultancy: Pierre Fabre. D. Meulendijks: Full / Part-time employment: AstraZeneca UK. C. Palles: Advisory / Consultancy: Oxford Cancer Biomarkers. U. Zanger: Licensing / Royalties: Robert Bosch GmbH. M. Boisdron-Celle: Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Leadership role, Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Licensing / Royalties, Officer / Board of Directors: ODPM. A. Marinaki: Full / Part-time employment: Viapath. E. Gross: Licensing / Royalties: Klinikum Rechts der Isar der Technischen Universitat Munchen. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
3006 - Nal-iri/lv5-fu versus paclitaxel as second-line therapy in patients with metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (OESIRI-PRODIGE 62): A FFCD multicenter, randomized, phase II study.
Presenter: Violaine Randrian
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3697 - The expression of Versican and its role in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor
Presenter: Zhao Sun
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
6073 - Characteristics of patients with thyroid carcinoma in the united states
Presenter: Dina El-Habashy
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2124 - The discrimination of pituitary adenomas and craniopharyngioma on MRI: from image features to texture features
Presenter: Hanyue Xu
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3786 - Proportion of Peripheral Lymphocyte Subsets Correlates with the Progression-free Survival and Metastatic Status of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor Patients
Presenter: Yitao Gong
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2263 - Immunohistochemical expression of ER-α and PR in papillary thyroid carcinoma
Presenter: Enas Elkhouly
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4386 - SILVELUL Project: Immunohistochemical panel analyses as potential predictive and prognostic factors in Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors (PanNET) Treated with CAPTEM or Everolimus
Presenter: Ana De Jesus-Acosta
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2302 - Carcinoid heart disease (CHD): the CRUSOE-NETs, a prospective cohort study from the French Group of Endocrine Tumors (GTE)
Presenter: Kathleen Dekeister Geoffroy
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5749 - Safety of high doses of somatostatin analogs in well differentiated NENs in elderly
Presenter: Massimiliano Cani
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3931 - Differences in multikinase inhibitors (MKI) toxicity profile according to gender. A pooled analysis of three phase II trials with lenvatinib, pazopanib and sorafenib in patients (pts) with advanced gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine tumors (NETs).
Presenter: Jorge Hernando Cubero
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract