Abstract 2196
Background
Despite decades of research, performance of DPYD genotyping to predict FP toxicity (tox) is poorly documented. GPCO-UNICANCER and RNPGx groups initiated the FUSAFE MA on individual patient data (IPD) to assess the prognostic value of consensual deleterious DPYD variants on grade (G) 4-5 FP tox.
Methods
Eligibility criteria included unbiased recruitment of Caucasian patients (pts) without FP dose adjustment based on DPD status. Main endpoint was 12 weeks hematological or digestive G4-5 tox. Age, sex, body mass index (BMI), advanced stage (M- vs M+), FP drug (5FU vs capecitabine), FP administration (bolus±continuous vs continuous alone or p.o.) and associated anticancer drugs (AAD) were collected. Multivariable logistic models were applied. Performance was assessed by AUC and diagnostic indices maximizing Youden index.
Results
From the 18 identified eligible studies (10230 pts), 14 were included (9030 pts), with complete IPD collected for 6403 pts (84% colorectal, 16% M+, 66% 5FU, 80% AAD). G4-5 tox prevalence was 8% (518 events). DPYD variants *2A, D949V, *13 and HapB3 were carried by 0.9%, 1.2%, 0.2% and 3.9% of pts, respectively. The clinical model (M1) retained age, sex, BMI, FP-administration, AAD. Adding variants *2A/D949V/*13 (at least one mutated allele) significantly (p<.0001) improved the model (M2). Further adding HapB3 did not improve the model (p=.24, M3). M3-adjusted OR (95%CI) was 10.0 (6.9-14.7) for the 3 variants *2A/D949V/*13 and 2.1 (1.4-3.0) for HapB3. Similar results were observed on colorectal pts only, or when excluding bolus administration alone.Table:
569P
Model | AUC (area under the curve) | Sensitivity | Specificity | Positive predictive value | Negative predictive value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
M1 | 0.725 | 69.7% | 65.4% | 15.1% | 96.1% |
M2 | 0.750 | 75.5% | 62.8% | 15.2% | 96.7% |
M3 | 0.752 | 76.4% | 61.9% | 15.0% | 96.8% |
Conclusions
This is the largest MA on DPYD genotyping and toxicity. It shows the relevance of clinical variables and of the 3 consensual DPYD variants. Despite its association with tox, HapB3 does not improve the discriminant ability to identify pts at risk of G4-5 toxicity.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France (Dr Marie-Christine Etienne-Grimaldi, coordinator).
Funding
French Cancer Institute (INCa) funding (PHRC-K 14-193 FUSAFE) and French Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer.
Disclosure
V. Boige: Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (self), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Merck Serono; Honoraria (self): Amgen; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Bayer; Honoraria (self), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Roche Genentech; Honoraria (self): MSD; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Ipsen; Advisory / Consultancy: Prestizia; Advisory / Consultancy: Eisai; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Sanofi. J. Taieb: Advisory / Consultancy: Amgen; Advisory / Consultancy: Lily; Advisory / Consultancy: Sanofi; Advisory / Consultancy: Roche; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck; Advisory / Consultancy: MSD; Advisory / Consultancy: Celgene; Advisory / Consultancy: Servier; Advisory / Consultancy: Sirtex; Advisory / Consultancy: Pierre Fabre. D. Meulendijks: Full / Part-time employment: AstraZeneca UK. C. Palles: Advisory / Consultancy: Oxford Cancer Biomarkers. U. Zanger: Licensing / Royalties: Robert Bosch GmbH. M. Boisdron-Celle: Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Leadership role, Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Licensing / Royalties, Officer / Board of Directors: ODPM. A. Marinaki: Full / Part-time employment: Viapath. E. Gross: Licensing / Royalties: Klinikum Rechts der Isar der Technischen Universitat Munchen. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
4317 - Prognostic factors analysis of 343 patients with adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction
Presenter: Yixun Lu
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4099 - Effects of preoperative preparation time on efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (SOX) in patients with advanced gastric cancer
Presenter: Xinxin Wang
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3769 - The prognostic value of higher absolute lymphocyte counts for patients with surgically resected non-advanced gastric cancer
Presenter: Se Jun Park
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1718 - Trastuzumab and pertuzumab added to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in resectable HER2+ esophageal adenocarcinoma patients: an update on survival and predictive biomarkers in the TRAP study
Presenter: Charlotte Stroes
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5403 - Interim analysis of a phase II trial of perioperative chemotherapy plus avelumab in esophagogastric and gastric adenocarcinoma
Presenter: Thierry Alcindor
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
591 - Evaluation of the introduction of primary G-CSF prophylaxis to the FLOT chemotherapy regimen.
Presenter: Kelly-Marie Crampton
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1402 - Subgroup analyses of a randomized two-by-two factorial phase II trial comparing neoadjuvant chemotherapy with 2 and 4 courses of cisplatin/S-1 (CS) and docetaxel/cisplatin/S-1 (DCS) as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer
Presenter: Tsutomu Hayashi
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3743 - HER2 Copy Number as Predictor of Disease-Free Survival in HER2-Positive Resectable Gastric Cancer
Presenter: Zimin Liu
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2032 - Effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on the Programmed Death-1 pathway in esophageal and gastric cancer
Presenter: Maria Svensson
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4304 - A user-friendly nomogram to predict relapse-free survival (RFS) in western patients with resected gastric cancer (GC)
Presenter: Massimiliano Salati
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract