Abstract 2196
Background
Despite decades of research, performance of DPYD genotyping to predict FP toxicity (tox) is poorly documented. GPCO-UNICANCER and RNPGx groups initiated the FUSAFE MA on individual patient data (IPD) to assess the prognostic value of consensual deleterious DPYD variants on grade (G) 4-5 FP tox.
Methods
Eligibility criteria included unbiased recruitment of Caucasian patients (pts) without FP dose adjustment based on DPD status. Main endpoint was 12 weeks hematological or digestive G4-5 tox. Age, sex, body mass index (BMI), advanced stage (M- vs M+), FP drug (5FU vs capecitabine), FP administration (bolus±continuous vs continuous alone or p.o.) and associated anticancer drugs (AAD) were collected. Multivariable logistic models were applied. Performance was assessed by AUC and diagnostic indices maximizing Youden index.
Results
From the 18 identified eligible studies (10230 pts), 14 were included (9030 pts), with complete IPD collected for 6403 pts (84% colorectal, 16% M+, 66% 5FU, 80% AAD). G4-5 tox prevalence was 8% (518 events). DPYD variants *2A, D949V, *13 and HapB3 were carried by 0.9%, 1.2%, 0.2% and 3.9% of pts, respectively. The clinical model (M1) retained age, sex, BMI, FP-administration, AAD. Adding variants *2A/D949V/*13 (at least one mutated allele) significantly (p<.0001) improved the model (M2). Further adding HapB3 did not improve the model (p=.24, M3). M3-adjusted OR (95%CI) was 10.0 (6.9-14.7) for the 3 variants *2A/D949V/*13 and 2.1 (1.4-3.0) for HapB3. Similar results were observed on colorectal pts only, or when excluding bolus administration alone.Table:
569P
Model | AUC (area under the curve) | Sensitivity | Specificity | Positive predictive value | Negative predictive value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
M1 | 0.725 | 69.7% | 65.4% | 15.1% | 96.1% |
M2 | 0.750 | 75.5% | 62.8% | 15.2% | 96.7% |
M3 | 0.752 | 76.4% | 61.9% | 15.0% | 96.8% |
Conclusions
This is the largest MA on DPYD genotyping and toxicity. It shows the relevance of clinical variables and of the 3 consensual DPYD variants. Despite its association with tox, HapB3 does not improve the discriminant ability to identify pts at risk of G4-5 toxicity.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France (Dr Marie-Christine Etienne-Grimaldi, coordinator).
Funding
French Cancer Institute (INCa) funding (PHRC-K 14-193 FUSAFE) and French Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer.
Disclosure
V. Boige: Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (self), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Merck Serono; Honoraria (self): Amgen; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Bayer; Honoraria (self), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Roche Genentech; Honoraria (self): MSD; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Ipsen; Advisory / Consultancy: Prestizia; Advisory / Consultancy: Eisai; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Sanofi. J. Taieb: Advisory / Consultancy: Amgen; Advisory / Consultancy: Lily; Advisory / Consultancy: Sanofi; Advisory / Consultancy: Roche; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck; Advisory / Consultancy: MSD; Advisory / Consultancy: Celgene; Advisory / Consultancy: Servier; Advisory / Consultancy: Sirtex; Advisory / Consultancy: Pierre Fabre. D. Meulendijks: Full / Part-time employment: AstraZeneca UK. C. Palles: Advisory / Consultancy: Oxford Cancer Biomarkers. U. Zanger: Licensing / Royalties: Robert Bosch GmbH. M. Boisdron-Celle: Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Leadership role, Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Licensing / Royalties, Officer / Board of Directors: ODPM. A. Marinaki: Full / Part-time employment: Viapath. E. Gross: Licensing / Royalties: Klinikum Rechts der Isar der Technischen Universitat Munchen. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
5694 - Findings from a new specialist remote Counselling Service for Neuroendocrine Neoplasm (NEN) patients and family members
Presenter: Catherine Bouvier
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4725 - Hematologic malignancies in temozolomide-treated metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors
Presenter: Nicole Balmaceda
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5842 - Efficacy and toxicity of combination chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, vincristine and an anthracycline in patients with metastatic extrapulmonary neuroendocrine carcinoma
Presenter: Leonidas Apostolidis
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1543 - An Australian multi-centre experience of the use of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy for bronchial carcinoid tumours.
Presenter: Lisi Lim
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4175 - Extra-pulmonary (EP) high grade (HG) neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC): real-life outcomes of fifty-eight patients from a Portuguese cancer center.
Presenter: Rita Conde
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3274 - Efficacy of immune check-point inhibitors (ICPi) in large cell neuroendocrine tumors of lung (LCNET)
Presenter: Shira Sherman
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3534 - HORMONET: Study of Tamoxifen in Well Differentiated Neuroendocrine Tumors and Hormone Receptor Positive Expression
Presenter: Milton Barros
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2137 - Clinical utility of Metabolic Tumor Volume in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma
Presenter: Norihiko Takemoto
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3864 - Correlation of thyroglobulin (Tg) oscillations with progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with radioactive iodine-refractory (RAI-R) differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC) treated with multikinase inhibitors (MKI).
Presenter: Jorge Hernando Cubero
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2820 - Analytical validation of a thyroid cancer diagnostic method based on the relative quantification of CLDN10, HMGA2 and LAMB3 expression
Presenter: Mateus Barrosfilho
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract