Abstract 920
Background
The antiemetic standard of care recommended by guidelines for prevention of CINV in patients receiving cisplatin- and AC-based CT is the combination of an NK1 RA, a 5-HT3 RA, and dexamethasone (DEX). An IV formulation of NEPA (fixed combination of the NK1 RA, fosnetupitant and 5-HT3 RA, palonosetron) was recently approved in the US and is under review in Europe. Approval of IV NEPA was based on showing pharmacokinetic bioequivalence of IV fosnetupitant to oral netupitant and similar safety of IV NEPA to oral NEPA in a phase III study in patients receiving cisplatin-based CT. An IV/oral NEPA safety-controlled phase IIIb study was recently completed in patients receiving AC CT. In both studies, there were no injection-site or hypersensitivity reactions associated with IV NEPA. This secondary analysis presents the efficacy of IV NEPA relative to that of oral NEPA and other NK1 RAs in cisplatin and AC settings.
Methods
Data is compiled from 5 pivotal NEPA studies in a total of 2077 adult chemotherapy-naïve patients with solid tumors undergoing either cisplatin- or AC-based CT. IV NEPA was administered as a single 30-min infusion; oral NEPA was given as a single capsule 60 min prior to CT. Patients also received DEX. Data was also reviewed from 9 phase III cisplatin and AC studies with other NK1 RA (aprepitant [APR], fosaprepitant [FOS], rolapitant [ROL]) regimens. No emesis rates are summarized for the overall phase (0-120h) of the initial cycle of CT. No formal statistical comparisons were performed.
Results
The overall no emesis rates of > 80% for IV NEPA were similar to oral NEPA in both cisplatin and AC settings and were favorable in the context of historical NK1 RA regimens.Table:
1765P
Setting/Study | IV NEPA + DEX | Oral NEPA + DEX | APR + 5-HT3RA + DEX | FOS + 5-HT3RA + DEX | ROL + 5-HT3RA + DEX |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cisplatin | |||||
Schwartzberg 2018 | 84.2% | 88.6% | - | - | |
Hesketh 2014 | - | 91.1% | - | - | |
Zhang 2018 | - | 75.0% | - | - | |
Grunberg 2011 | - | - | 74.6% | 72.9% | |
Hesketh 2003 | - | - | 77.7% | - | - |
Poli-Bigelli 2003 | - | - | 66% | - | - |
Schmoll 2006 | - | - | 76.5% | - | - |
Saito 2013 | - | - | - | 67.6% | - |
Rapoport 2015 (HEC-1) | - | - | - | - | 75% |
Rapoport 2015 (HEC-2) | - | - | - | - | 71% |
AC | |||||
Schwartzberg 2019 | 82.5% | 86.1% | - | - | - |
Aapro 2014 | - | 79.8% | - | - | - |
Warr 2005 | - | - | 76% | - | - |
Schwartzberg 2016 | - | - | - | - | 72.4% |
Conclusions
Both IV and oral formulations of NEPA along with DEX represent highly effective guideline-compliant single-dose antiemetics.
Clinical trial identification
NCT03403712.
Editorial acknowledgement
Jennifer Vanden Burgt, Minneapolis, MN, funded by Helsinn Healthcare, Lugano, Switzerland.
Legal entity responsible for the study
Helsinn Healthcare.
Funding
Helsinn Healthcare.
Disclosure
L. Schwartzberg: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Helsinn Healthcare ; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Tesaro; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck ; Advisory / Consultancy: Heron. M.S. Aapro: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Helsinn Healthcare; Advisory / Consultancy: Mundipharma; Advisory / Consultancy: Tesaro; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck; Advisory / Consultancy: G1 Therapeutics.
Resources from the same session
4852 - Impact of routine screening and preemptive treatment on hepatitis B virus reactivation (HBVr) in patients receiving chemotherapy
Presenter: Celine Marty
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5225 - The uptake, patient satisfaction and efficacy of scalp cooling among patients receiving chemotherapy in an Irish oncology day ward.
Presenter: William Maher
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1901 - Placebo adverse events (AEs) in targeted and immune cancer therapy in the adjuvant and advanced setting: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Diego Enrico
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3258 - Reduced antibody levels and high seronegativity rates against vaccine preventable diseases pose a risk factor for infections in patients with solid and hematologic cancers
Presenter: Angela Guzek
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3211 - Prognostic Factors Influencing Outcome After Therapy With Brentuximab Vedotin in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Hodgkin's Lymphoma
Presenter: Veselina Goranova - Marinova
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4949 - Phase I Study of CC-90010 in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors and Relapsed/Refractory Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (R/R NHL)
Presenter: Victor Moreno
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2271 - Pretreatment coagulation factors related to prognosis in patients with natural killer/T cell lymphoma
Presenter: Yue Chai
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4335 - Diffuse large B cell lymphoma in the elderly. A retrospective analysis of standard versus alternative treatments
Presenter: Irene Sillero
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5117 - MIPI as a superior prognostic tool in Mantle Cell Lymphoma compared to monocyte-lymphocyte, neutrophil-lymphocyte and platelet-lymphocyte ratios
Presenter: Filipa Macedo
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5135 - Dose adjustment of chemotherapy in aggressive lymphoma using automated and standardized analysis and evaluation of DNA double strand breaks
Presenter: Julia Schröder
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract