Abstract 920
Background
The antiemetic standard of care recommended by guidelines for prevention of CINV in patients receiving cisplatin- and AC-based CT is the combination of an NK1 RA, a 5-HT3 RA, and dexamethasone (DEX). An IV formulation of NEPA (fixed combination of the NK1 RA, fosnetupitant and 5-HT3 RA, palonosetron) was recently approved in the US and is under review in Europe. Approval of IV NEPA was based on showing pharmacokinetic bioequivalence of IV fosnetupitant to oral netupitant and similar safety of IV NEPA to oral NEPA in a phase III study in patients receiving cisplatin-based CT. An IV/oral NEPA safety-controlled phase IIIb study was recently completed in patients receiving AC CT. In both studies, there were no injection-site or hypersensitivity reactions associated with IV NEPA. This secondary analysis presents the efficacy of IV NEPA relative to that of oral NEPA and other NK1 RAs in cisplatin and AC settings.
Methods
Data is compiled from 5 pivotal NEPA studies in a total of 2077 adult chemotherapy-naïve patients with solid tumors undergoing either cisplatin- or AC-based CT. IV NEPA was administered as a single 30-min infusion; oral NEPA was given as a single capsule 60 min prior to CT. Patients also received DEX. Data was also reviewed from 9 phase III cisplatin and AC studies with other NK1 RA (aprepitant [APR], fosaprepitant [FOS], rolapitant [ROL]) regimens. No emesis rates are summarized for the overall phase (0-120h) of the initial cycle of CT. No formal statistical comparisons were performed.
Results
The overall no emesis rates of > 80% for IV NEPA were similar to oral NEPA in both cisplatin and AC settings and were favorable in the context of historical NK1 RA regimens.Table:
1765P
Setting/Study | IV NEPA + DEX | Oral NEPA + DEX | APR + 5-HT3RA + DEX | FOS + 5-HT3RA + DEX | ROL + 5-HT3RA + DEX |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cisplatin | |||||
Schwartzberg 2018 | 84.2% | 88.6% | - | - | |
Hesketh 2014 | - | 91.1% | - | - | |
Zhang 2018 | - | 75.0% | - | - | |
Grunberg 2011 | - | - | 74.6% | 72.9% | |
Hesketh 2003 | - | - | 77.7% | - | - |
Poli-Bigelli 2003 | - | - | 66% | - | - |
Schmoll 2006 | - | - | 76.5% | - | - |
Saito 2013 | - | - | - | 67.6% | - |
Rapoport 2015 (HEC-1) | - | - | - | - | 75% |
Rapoport 2015 (HEC-2) | - | - | - | - | 71% |
AC | |||||
Schwartzberg 2019 | 82.5% | 86.1% | - | - | - |
Aapro 2014 | - | 79.8% | - | - | - |
Warr 2005 | - | - | 76% | - | - |
Schwartzberg 2016 | - | - | - | - | 72.4% |
Conclusions
Both IV and oral formulations of NEPA along with DEX represent highly effective guideline-compliant single-dose antiemetics.
Clinical trial identification
NCT03403712.
Editorial acknowledgement
Jennifer Vanden Burgt, Minneapolis, MN, funded by Helsinn Healthcare, Lugano, Switzerland.
Legal entity responsible for the study
Helsinn Healthcare.
Funding
Helsinn Healthcare.
Disclosure
L. Schwartzberg: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Helsinn Healthcare ; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Tesaro; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck ; Advisory / Consultancy: Heron. M.S. Aapro: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Helsinn Healthcare; Advisory / Consultancy: Mundipharma; Advisory / Consultancy: Tesaro; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck; Advisory / Consultancy: G1 Therapeutics.
Resources from the same session
3993 - Prophylaxis with Lipegfilgrastim in patients with primary breast cancer receiving dose dense chemotherapy: results from the German NIS NADENS
Presenter: Marion Kiechle
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3471 - Randomized phase 2 trial evaluating the safety of peripherally inserted central catheters vs implanted port catheters during adjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer patients.
Presenter: Florian Clatot
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1327 - Simultaneous intravenous fluid infusion to prevent oxaliplatin infusion-related venous pain
Presenter: Stefan Van Ravensteijn
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5004 - Clinical practice evaluation of opioids induced constipation management in cancer patients: The EIO-Praxis project.
Presenter: Enrique Aranda Aguilar
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2222 - Analysis of the efficacy of naloxegol in a real-world 12 weeks of follow-up study, in patients with cancer and opioid-induced constipation with laxative-inadequate response.
Presenter: Manuel Cobo Dols
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5556 - Consensus on strategies in the management of opioid-induced constipation in cancer patients
Presenter: Regina Girones Sarrio
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3913 - Effect of Chinese Herbal Compound LC09 on Patients With Capecitabine-Associated Hand-Foot Syndrome: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial
Presenter: Yanni Lou
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2208 - A prospective study about the complementary medicine among patients with cancers
Presenter: Wala Ben Kridis
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1082 - Prevalence and management of Potentially Inappropriate Medication use and Potential Omissions in Medication in older cancer patients - the PIM POM study
Presenter: Fianne van Loveren
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1701 - Immunogenicity and optimal timing of 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccination during adjuvant chemotherapy in gastric and colorectal cancer : A randomized controlled trial
Presenter: Wonyoung Choi
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract