Abstract 920
Background
The antiemetic standard of care recommended by guidelines for prevention of CINV in patients receiving cisplatin- and AC-based CT is the combination of an NK1 RA, a 5-HT3 RA, and dexamethasone (DEX). An IV formulation of NEPA (fixed combination of the NK1 RA, fosnetupitant and 5-HT3 RA, palonosetron) was recently approved in the US and is under review in Europe. Approval of IV NEPA was based on showing pharmacokinetic bioequivalence of IV fosnetupitant to oral netupitant and similar safety of IV NEPA to oral NEPA in a phase III study in patients receiving cisplatin-based CT. An IV/oral NEPA safety-controlled phase IIIb study was recently completed in patients receiving AC CT. In both studies, there were no injection-site or hypersensitivity reactions associated with IV NEPA. This secondary analysis presents the efficacy of IV NEPA relative to that of oral NEPA and other NK1 RAs in cisplatin and AC settings.
Methods
Data is compiled from 5 pivotal NEPA studies in a total of 2077 adult chemotherapy-naïve patients with solid tumors undergoing either cisplatin- or AC-based CT. IV NEPA was administered as a single 30-min infusion; oral NEPA was given as a single capsule 60 min prior to CT. Patients also received DEX. Data was also reviewed from 9 phase III cisplatin and AC studies with other NK1 RA (aprepitant [APR], fosaprepitant [FOS], rolapitant [ROL]) regimens. No emesis rates are summarized for the overall phase (0-120h) of the initial cycle of CT. No formal statistical comparisons were performed.
Results
The overall no emesis rates of > 80% for IV NEPA were similar to oral NEPA in both cisplatin and AC settings and were favorable in the context of historical NK1 RA regimens.Table:
1765P
Setting/Study | IV NEPA + DEX | Oral NEPA + DEX | APR + 5-HT3RA + DEX | FOS + 5-HT3RA + DEX | ROL + 5-HT3RA + DEX |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cisplatin | |||||
Schwartzberg 2018 | 84.2% | 88.6% | - | - | |
Hesketh 2014 | - | 91.1% | - | - | |
Zhang 2018 | - | 75.0% | - | - | |
Grunberg 2011 | - | - | 74.6% | 72.9% | |
Hesketh 2003 | - | - | 77.7% | - | - |
Poli-Bigelli 2003 | - | - | 66% | - | - |
Schmoll 2006 | - | - | 76.5% | - | - |
Saito 2013 | - | - | - | 67.6% | - |
Rapoport 2015 (HEC-1) | - | - | - | - | 75% |
Rapoport 2015 (HEC-2) | - | - | - | - | 71% |
AC | |||||
Schwartzberg 2019 | 82.5% | 86.1% | - | - | - |
Aapro 2014 | - | 79.8% | - | - | - |
Warr 2005 | - | - | 76% | - | - |
Schwartzberg 2016 | - | - | - | - | 72.4% |
Conclusions
Both IV and oral formulations of NEPA along with DEX represent highly effective guideline-compliant single-dose antiemetics.
Clinical trial identification
NCT03403712.
Editorial acknowledgement
Jennifer Vanden Burgt, Minneapolis, MN, funded by Helsinn Healthcare, Lugano, Switzerland.
Legal entity responsible for the study
Helsinn Healthcare.
Funding
Helsinn Healthcare.
Disclosure
L. Schwartzberg: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Helsinn Healthcare ; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Tesaro; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck ; Advisory / Consultancy: Heron. M.S. Aapro: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Helsinn Healthcare; Advisory / Consultancy: Mundipharma; Advisory / Consultancy: Tesaro; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck; Advisory / Consultancy: G1 Therapeutics.
Resources from the same session
3157 - Efficacy and safety of anlotinib in advanced leiomyosarcoma: Subgroup analysis of a phase IIB trial (ALTER0203)
Presenter: Yihebali Chi
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3710 - The effect of treatment line on the efficacy of Anlotinib hydrochloride in advanced alveolar soft part sarcoma patients
Presenter: Zhiwei Fang
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3184 - Prior exposure to pazopanib (PAZ) did not minor efficacy of regorafenib (REG) in non-adipocytic soft tissue sarcoma patients (pts)
Presenter: Nicolas Penel
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
798 - Pexidartinib (Pex) for locally advanced tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TGCT): characterization of hepatic adverse reactions (ARs)
Presenter: Sebastian Bauer
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
6117 - VEGFR2 and ITGA polymorphisms as novel pan-sarcoma biomarkers for sensitivity prediction as well as toxicity prevention anti-angiogenesis therapy in pediatric and young adult
Presenter: Qiyuan Bao
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5450 - Reversion of resistance to mTOR inhibitors with the addition of exemestane in patients with malignant PEComa.
Presenter: Roberta Sanfilippo
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4279 - Efficacy and Safety of VEGFR2 Inhibitor Apatinib combined with chemotherapy for Sarcoma in Stage IV
Presenter: Zhiwu Ren
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5929 - Outcomes of metastatic soft tissue sarcoma treated with Pazopanib from dedicated medical oncology sarcoma clinic: A holistic care approach from a developing country
Presenter: Akhil Kapoor
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2469 - Inhibition of mTOR signaling enhances Trabectedin activity in Soft Tissue Sarcoma
Presenter: David Moura
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4210 - Efficacy and safety of apatinib for advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors after failure of imatinib and sunitinib: An open-label, multicenter, single-arm, phase II trial
Presenter: Zhaolun Cai
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract