Abstract 920
Background
The antiemetic standard of care recommended by guidelines for prevention of CINV in patients receiving cisplatin- and AC-based CT is the combination of an NK1 RA, a 5-HT3 RA, and dexamethasone (DEX). An IV formulation of NEPA (fixed combination of the NK1 RA, fosnetupitant and 5-HT3 RA, palonosetron) was recently approved in the US and is under review in Europe. Approval of IV NEPA was based on showing pharmacokinetic bioequivalence of IV fosnetupitant to oral netupitant and similar safety of IV NEPA to oral NEPA in a phase III study in patients receiving cisplatin-based CT. An IV/oral NEPA safety-controlled phase IIIb study was recently completed in patients receiving AC CT. In both studies, there were no injection-site or hypersensitivity reactions associated with IV NEPA. This secondary analysis presents the efficacy of IV NEPA relative to that of oral NEPA and other NK1 RAs in cisplatin and AC settings.
Methods
Data is compiled from 5 pivotal NEPA studies in a total of 2077 adult chemotherapy-naïve patients with solid tumors undergoing either cisplatin- or AC-based CT. IV NEPA was administered as a single 30-min infusion; oral NEPA was given as a single capsule 60 min prior to CT. Patients also received DEX. Data was also reviewed from 9 phase III cisplatin and AC studies with other NK1 RA (aprepitant [APR], fosaprepitant [FOS], rolapitant [ROL]) regimens. No emesis rates are summarized for the overall phase (0-120h) of the initial cycle of CT. No formal statistical comparisons were performed.
Results
The overall no emesis rates of > 80% for IV NEPA were similar to oral NEPA in both cisplatin and AC settings and were favorable in the context of historical NK1 RA regimens.Table:
1765P
Setting/Study | IV NEPA + DEX | Oral NEPA + DEX | APR + 5-HT3RA + DEX | FOS + 5-HT3RA + DEX | ROL + 5-HT3RA + DEX |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cisplatin | |||||
Schwartzberg 2018 | 84.2% | 88.6% | - | - | |
Hesketh 2014 | - | 91.1% | - | - | |
Zhang 2018 | - | 75.0% | - | - | |
Grunberg 2011 | - | - | 74.6% | 72.9% | |
Hesketh 2003 | - | - | 77.7% | - | - |
Poli-Bigelli 2003 | - | - | 66% | - | - |
Schmoll 2006 | - | - | 76.5% | - | - |
Saito 2013 | - | - | - | 67.6% | - |
Rapoport 2015 (HEC-1) | - | - | - | - | 75% |
Rapoport 2015 (HEC-2) | - | - | - | - | 71% |
AC | |||||
Schwartzberg 2019 | 82.5% | 86.1% | - | - | - |
Aapro 2014 | - | 79.8% | - | - | - |
Warr 2005 | - | - | 76% | - | - |
Schwartzberg 2016 | - | - | - | - | 72.4% |
Conclusions
Both IV and oral formulations of NEPA along with DEX represent highly effective guideline-compliant single-dose antiemetics.
Clinical trial identification
NCT03403712.
Editorial acknowledgement
Jennifer Vanden Burgt, Minneapolis, MN, funded by Helsinn Healthcare, Lugano, Switzerland.
Legal entity responsible for the study
Helsinn Healthcare.
Funding
Helsinn Healthcare.
Disclosure
L. Schwartzberg: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Helsinn Healthcare ; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Tesaro; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck ; Advisory / Consultancy: Heron. M.S. Aapro: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Helsinn Healthcare; Advisory / Consultancy: Mundipharma; Advisory / Consultancy: Tesaro; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck; Advisory / Consultancy: G1 Therapeutics.
Resources from the same session
4294 - The Patient Voice: An Irish Survey of Nutrition Attitudes & Access to Dietetic Care Throughout the Cancer Journey
Presenter: Erin Stella Sullivan
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1925 - Homcology: home chemotherapy delivery in a simultaneous care project for frail advanced cancer patients
Presenter: Claudio Chini
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4701 - Treatment-related adverse events and tolerability in patients with advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer treated with first-line checkpoint inhibitors in combination with chemotherapy
Presenter: Ruth D'cunha
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2985 - Clinical utility of a systematic toxicity assessment form (STAF) in patients with breast cancer receiving adjuvant or neoadjuvant therapy.
Presenter: Jwa Hoon Kim
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2358 - Physicians’ satisfaction with Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) assessment in daily clinical practice using electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) for cancer patients.
Presenter: Guillaume Mouillet
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5172 - Predictors of Survival in Patients with Incurable Cancer
Presenter: Erin Stella Sullivan
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2281 - Patients and Physicians' Satisfaction with Telemedicine (TM) in Cancer Care and Factors that Correlate with a Positive Patient’s Experience
Presenter: Hurria Gondal
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2193 - Adherence to ESMO 2014 guidelines on bone-targeting agent (BTA) initiation for breast and prostate cancer patients: real-world insights from practicing European physicians
Presenter: Alex Rider
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2200 - Use of skeletal-related events preventive agents in patients with solid tumours and bone metastases in central Denmark
Presenter: Anders Boysen
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2504 - Inadequacy of current definition and staging system of Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of Jaw (MRONJ) released by AAOMS : a Computed Tomography study in 151 cancer and myeloma patients
Presenter: Vittorio Fusco
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract