Abstract 920
Background
The antiemetic standard of care recommended by guidelines for prevention of CINV in patients receiving cisplatin- and AC-based CT is the combination of an NK1 RA, a 5-HT3 RA, and dexamethasone (DEX). An IV formulation of NEPA (fixed combination of the NK1 RA, fosnetupitant and 5-HT3 RA, palonosetron) was recently approved in the US and is under review in Europe. Approval of IV NEPA was based on showing pharmacokinetic bioequivalence of IV fosnetupitant to oral netupitant and similar safety of IV NEPA to oral NEPA in a phase III study in patients receiving cisplatin-based CT. An IV/oral NEPA safety-controlled phase IIIb study was recently completed in patients receiving AC CT. In both studies, there were no injection-site or hypersensitivity reactions associated with IV NEPA. This secondary analysis presents the efficacy of IV NEPA relative to that of oral NEPA and other NK1 RAs in cisplatin and AC settings.
Methods
Data is compiled from 5 pivotal NEPA studies in a total of 2077 adult chemotherapy-naïve patients with solid tumors undergoing either cisplatin- or AC-based CT. IV NEPA was administered as a single 30-min infusion; oral NEPA was given as a single capsule 60 min prior to CT. Patients also received DEX. Data was also reviewed from 9 phase III cisplatin and AC studies with other NK1 RA (aprepitant [APR], fosaprepitant [FOS], rolapitant [ROL]) regimens. No emesis rates are summarized for the overall phase (0-120h) of the initial cycle of CT. No formal statistical comparisons were performed.
Results
The overall no emesis rates of > 80% for IV NEPA were similar to oral NEPA in both cisplatin and AC settings and were favorable in the context of historical NK1 RA regimens.Table:
1765P
Setting/Study | IV NEPA + DEX | Oral NEPA + DEX | APR + 5-HT3RA + DEX | FOS + 5-HT3RA + DEX | ROL + 5-HT3RA + DEX |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cisplatin | |||||
Schwartzberg 2018 | 84.2% | 88.6% | - | - | |
Hesketh 2014 | - | 91.1% | - | - | |
Zhang 2018 | - | 75.0% | - | - | |
Grunberg 2011 | - | - | 74.6% | 72.9% | |
Hesketh 2003 | - | - | 77.7% | - | - |
Poli-Bigelli 2003 | - | - | 66% | - | - |
Schmoll 2006 | - | - | 76.5% | - | - |
Saito 2013 | - | - | - | 67.6% | - |
Rapoport 2015 (HEC-1) | - | - | - | - | 75% |
Rapoport 2015 (HEC-2) | - | - | - | - | 71% |
AC | |||||
Schwartzberg 2019 | 82.5% | 86.1% | - | - | - |
Aapro 2014 | - | 79.8% | - | - | - |
Warr 2005 | - | - | 76% | - | - |
Schwartzberg 2016 | - | - | - | - | 72.4% |
Conclusions
Both IV and oral formulations of NEPA along with DEX represent highly effective guideline-compliant single-dose antiemetics.
Clinical trial identification
NCT03403712.
Editorial acknowledgement
Jennifer Vanden Burgt, Minneapolis, MN, funded by Helsinn Healthcare, Lugano, Switzerland.
Legal entity responsible for the study
Helsinn Healthcare.
Funding
Helsinn Healthcare.
Disclosure
L. Schwartzberg: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Helsinn Healthcare ; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Tesaro; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck ; Advisory / Consultancy: Heron. M.S. Aapro: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Helsinn Healthcare; Advisory / Consultancy: Mundipharma; Advisory / Consultancy: Tesaro; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck; Advisory / Consultancy: G1 Therapeutics.
Resources from the same session
2023 - Patients with brain metastases treated with afatinib in clinical practice – results from the prospective non-interventional study GIDEON
Presenter: Eckart Laack
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1613 - Lerociclib (G1T38), an oral CDK4/6 inhibitor, dosed continuously in combination with osimertinib for EGFRmut non-small cell lung cancer: initial Phase 1b results
Presenter: David Berz
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2853 - Real-world implementation of sequential targeted therapies for EGFR-mutated NSCLC
Presenter: Petros Christopoulos
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1974 - A Phase II Open-Label, Multicentre Study to Assess the Anti-tumour Activity of Afatinib in Patients with Activating Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor mutation (EGFRm) from Circulating Tumor DNA (CtDNA)
Presenter: Young-Chul Kim
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3370 - Influence of cow’s milk on the absorption and exposure of erlotinib in NSCLC patients
Presenter: Geerten Veerman
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5900 - PTEN loss as Predictor of Tumor Heterogeneity (TH) and Poor Prognosis in EGFR-mutant Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (ANSCLC) Patients (pts) Receiving Tyrosine-Kinase Inhibitors (TKIs).
Presenter: Miriam Ferrara
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1302 - Safety of lorlatinib in subgroups of patients from a phase 1/2 trial
Presenter: Enriqueta Felip
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1497 - Brigatinib (BRG) in Asian vs non-Asian patients (pts) with crizotinib (CRZ)-refractory ALK+ NSCLC in the phase 2 ALTA trial
Presenter: Dae Ho Lee
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2349 - The safety assessment of crizotinib and alectinib from real world data of 840 ALK-inhibitor naïve patients with NSCLC harboring ALK-rearrangement (WJOG9516L).
Presenter: Kei Kunimasa
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1120 - Brigatinib in ALK TKI-pretreated ALK+ metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC): the Use Via Expanded Access to Brigatinib (UVEA-Brig) study
Presenter: Silvia Novello
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract