Abstract 920
Background
The antiemetic standard of care recommended by guidelines for prevention of CINV in patients receiving cisplatin- and AC-based CT is the combination of an NK1 RA, a 5-HT3 RA, and dexamethasone (DEX). An IV formulation of NEPA (fixed combination of the NK1 RA, fosnetupitant and 5-HT3 RA, palonosetron) was recently approved in the US and is under review in Europe. Approval of IV NEPA was based on showing pharmacokinetic bioequivalence of IV fosnetupitant to oral netupitant and similar safety of IV NEPA to oral NEPA in a phase III study in patients receiving cisplatin-based CT. An IV/oral NEPA safety-controlled phase IIIb study was recently completed in patients receiving AC CT. In both studies, there were no injection-site or hypersensitivity reactions associated with IV NEPA. This secondary analysis presents the efficacy of IV NEPA relative to that of oral NEPA and other NK1 RAs in cisplatin and AC settings.
Methods
Data is compiled from 5 pivotal NEPA studies in a total of 2077 adult chemotherapy-naïve patients with solid tumors undergoing either cisplatin- or AC-based CT. IV NEPA was administered as a single 30-min infusion; oral NEPA was given as a single capsule 60 min prior to CT. Patients also received DEX. Data was also reviewed from 9 phase III cisplatin and AC studies with other NK1 RA (aprepitant [APR], fosaprepitant [FOS], rolapitant [ROL]) regimens. No emesis rates are summarized for the overall phase (0-120h) of the initial cycle of CT. No formal statistical comparisons were performed.
Results
The overall no emesis rates of > 80% for IV NEPA were similar to oral NEPA in both cisplatin and AC settings and were favorable in the context of historical NK1 RA regimens.Table:
1765P
Setting/Study | IV NEPA + DEX | Oral NEPA + DEX | APR + 5-HT3RA + DEX | FOS + 5-HT3RA + DEX | ROL + 5-HT3RA + DEX |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cisplatin | |||||
Schwartzberg 2018 | 84.2% | 88.6% | - | - | |
Hesketh 2014 | - | 91.1% | - | - | |
Zhang 2018 | - | 75.0% | - | - | |
Grunberg 2011 | - | - | 74.6% | 72.9% | |
Hesketh 2003 | - | - | 77.7% | - | - |
Poli-Bigelli 2003 | - | - | 66% | - | - |
Schmoll 2006 | - | - | 76.5% | - | - |
Saito 2013 | - | - | - | 67.6% | - |
Rapoport 2015 (HEC-1) | - | - | - | - | 75% |
Rapoport 2015 (HEC-2) | - | - | - | - | 71% |
AC | |||||
Schwartzberg 2019 | 82.5% | 86.1% | - | - | - |
Aapro 2014 | - | 79.8% | - | - | - |
Warr 2005 | - | - | 76% | - | - |
Schwartzberg 2016 | - | - | - | - | 72.4% |
Conclusions
Both IV and oral formulations of NEPA along with DEX represent highly effective guideline-compliant single-dose antiemetics.
Clinical trial identification
NCT03403712.
Editorial acknowledgement
Jennifer Vanden Burgt, Minneapolis, MN, funded by Helsinn Healthcare, Lugano, Switzerland.
Legal entity responsible for the study
Helsinn Healthcare.
Funding
Helsinn Healthcare.
Disclosure
L. Schwartzberg: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Helsinn Healthcare ; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Tesaro; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck ; Advisory / Consultancy: Heron. M.S. Aapro: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Helsinn Healthcare; Advisory / Consultancy: Mundipharma; Advisory / Consultancy: Tesaro; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck; Advisory / Consultancy: G1 Therapeutics.
Resources from the same session
3020 - Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis depicts mechanisms of resistance and tumor response to BRAF inhibitors in BRAF-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
Presenter: Sandra Ortiz - Cuaran
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1271 - A large scale prospective concordance study of oncogene driver detection between plasma- and tissue-based NGS analysis in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Presenter: Ryo Itotani
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1132 - Biomarker status as a mediator of age-related overall survival (OS) in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC)
Presenter: Aaron Cohen
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1502 - An exploratory analysis of on-treatment ctDNA measurement as a potential surrogate for overall survival for atezolizumab benefit in the OAK Study
Presenter: David Gandara
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3912 - Disease monitoring of EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC patients via circulating tumor DNA
Presenter: Wei Fang Hsu
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3856 - Incidence of T790M in NSCLC patients progressed to gefitinib, erlotinib, and afatinib: a study on circulating tumor DNA
Presenter: Romano Danesi
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1330 - Folate receptor-positive circulating tumor cells as a predictive biomarker for the efficacy of first-line pemetrexed-based therapy in patients with non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer
Presenter: Xiaoxia Chen
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3512 - Carcinoembryonic Antigen of Cerebrospinal Fluid Predict Prognosis of Leptomeningeal Metastasis from Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Presenter: Junjie Zhen
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3852 - Liquid biopsy in clinical pratice of Non-Small-Cell-Lung Cancer (NSCLC): a multi-institutional experience
Presenter: Giovanna De Maglio
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1205 - A Phase III Study Comparing SB8, a Proposed Bevacizumab Biosimilar, and Reference Bevacizumab in Patients with Metastatic or Recurrent Non-squamous NSCLC
Presenter: Martin Reck
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract