Abstract 920
Background
The antiemetic standard of care recommended by guidelines for prevention of CINV in patients receiving cisplatin- and AC-based CT is the combination of an NK1 RA, a 5-HT3 RA, and dexamethasone (DEX). An IV formulation of NEPA (fixed combination of the NK1 RA, fosnetupitant and 5-HT3 RA, palonosetron) was recently approved in the US and is under review in Europe. Approval of IV NEPA was based on showing pharmacokinetic bioequivalence of IV fosnetupitant to oral netupitant and similar safety of IV NEPA to oral NEPA in a phase III study in patients receiving cisplatin-based CT. An IV/oral NEPA safety-controlled phase IIIb study was recently completed in patients receiving AC CT. In both studies, there were no injection-site or hypersensitivity reactions associated with IV NEPA. This secondary analysis presents the efficacy of IV NEPA relative to that of oral NEPA and other NK1 RAs in cisplatin and AC settings.
Methods
Data is compiled from 5 pivotal NEPA studies in a total of 2077 adult chemotherapy-naïve patients with solid tumors undergoing either cisplatin- or AC-based CT. IV NEPA was administered as a single 30-min infusion; oral NEPA was given as a single capsule 60 min prior to CT. Patients also received DEX. Data was also reviewed from 9 phase III cisplatin and AC studies with other NK1 RA (aprepitant [APR], fosaprepitant [FOS], rolapitant [ROL]) regimens. No emesis rates are summarized for the overall phase (0-120h) of the initial cycle of CT. No formal statistical comparisons were performed.
Results
The overall no emesis rates of > 80% for IV NEPA were similar to oral NEPA in both cisplatin and AC settings and were favorable in the context of historical NK1 RA regimens.Table:
1765P
Setting/Study | IV NEPA + DEX | Oral NEPA + DEX | APR + 5-HT3RA + DEX | FOS + 5-HT3RA + DEX | ROL + 5-HT3RA + DEX |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cisplatin | |||||
Schwartzberg 2018 | 84.2% | 88.6% | - | - | |
Hesketh 2014 | - | 91.1% | - | - | |
Zhang 2018 | - | 75.0% | - | - | |
Grunberg 2011 | - | - | 74.6% | 72.9% | |
Hesketh 2003 | - | - | 77.7% | - | - |
Poli-Bigelli 2003 | - | - | 66% | - | - |
Schmoll 2006 | - | - | 76.5% | - | - |
Saito 2013 | - | - | - | 67.6% | - |
Rapoport 2015 (HEC-1) | - | - | - | - | 75% |
Rapoport 2015 (HEC-2) | - | - | - | - | 71% |
AC | |||||
Schwartzberg 2019 | 82.5% | 86.1% | - | - | - |
Aapro 2014 | - | 79.8% | - | - | - |
Warr 2005 | - | - | 76% | - | - |
Schwartzberg 2016 | - | - | - | - | 72.4% |
Conclusions
Both IV and oral formulations of NEPA along with DEX represent highly effective guideline-compliant single-dose antiemetics.
Clinical trial identification
NCT03403712.
Editorial acknowledgement
Jennifer Vanden Burgt, Minneapolis, MN, funded by Helsinn Healthcare, Lugano, Switzerland.
Legal entity responsible for the study
Helsinn Healthcare.
Funding
Helsinn Healthcare.
Disclosure
L. Schwartzberg: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Helsinn Healthcare ; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Tesaro; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck ; Advisory / Consultancy: Heron. M.S. Aapro: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Helsinn Healthcare; Advisory / Consultancy: Mundipharma; Advisory / Consultancy: Tesaro; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck; Advisory / Consultancy: G1 Therapeutics.
Resources from the same session
2432 - Retrospective comparative study of the efficacy and safety in docetaxel and ramucirumab combination chemotherapy with or without previous immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment.
Presenter: Daijiro Harada
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2791 - Efficacy of weekly paclitaxel-bevacizumab combination in advanced non squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) : a retrospective multicentric study.
Presenter: Geoffroy Bilger
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2916 - Post progression survival for patients treated with docetaxel/nintedanib in the SENECA trial
Presenter: Enrica Capelletto
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1427 - Final results of randomized phase II trial of metronomic vs weekly oral vinorelbine (OV) as first-line chemotherapy (CT) in advanced NSCLC patients unfit to platinum-based CT (P-CT): Tempo-Lung EudraCT Number: 2014-003859-61
Presenter: Dariusz Kowalski
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3789 - Pioglitazone and clarithromycin combined with metronomic low-dose chemotherapy versus nivolumab in patients with advanced non–small-cell lung cancer treated in 2nd-line and beyond: Outcomes from a randomized phase II trial (ModuLung)
Presenter: Daniel Heudobler
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1519 - Predicting Chemotherapy Toxicity in Elderly Patients with Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Prospective Multicenter Study of the National Hospital Organization in Japan
Presenter: Masaki Kanazu
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1874 - A prospective phase II trial of carboplatin (CBDCA) and nab-paclitaxel (nabPTX) for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with interstitial lung disease (ILD)
Presenter: Toshiyuki Harada
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3819 - Weekly Epirubicin as palliative treatment in elderly patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma.
Presenter: Paola Candido
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3390 - Survival Prolongation by Rationale INnovative Genomics (SPRING): An international WIN Consortium phase I study exploring safety and efficacy of avelumab, palbociclib, and axitinib in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with integrated genomic and transcriptomic correlates.
Presenter: Benjamin Solomon
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5069 - Preliminary results from phase 1b study of spartalizumab plus chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
Presenter: Armando Santoro
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract