Abstract 920
Background
The antiemetic standard of care recommended by guidelines for prevention of CINV in patients receiving cisplatin- and AC-based CT is the combination of an NK1 RA, a 5-HT3 RA, and dexamethasone (DEX). An IV formulation of NEPA (fixed combination of the NK1 RA, fosnetupitant and 5-HT3 RA, palonosetron) was recently approved in the US and is under review in Europe. Approval of IV NEPA was based on showing pharmacokinetic bioequivalence of IV fosnetupitant to oral netupitant and similar safety of IV NEPA to oral NEPA in a phase III study in patients receiving cisplatin-based CT. An IV/oral NEPA safety-controlled phase IIIb study was recently completed in patients receiving AC CT. In both studies, there were no injection-site or hypersensitivity reactions associated with IV NEPA. This secondary analysis presents the efficacy of IV NEPA relative to that of oral NEPA and other NK1 RAs in cisplatin and AC settings.
Methods
Data is compiled from 5 pivotal NEPA studies in a total of 2077 adult chemotherapy-naïve patients with solid tumors undergoing either cisplatin- or AC-based CT. IV NEPA was administered as a single 30-min infusion; oral NEPA was given as a single capsule 60 min prior to CT. Patients also received DEX. Data was also reviewed from 9 phase III cisplatin and AC studies with other NK1 RA (aprepitant [APR], fosaprepitant [FOS], rolapitant [ROL]) regimens. No emesis rates are summarized for the overall phase (0-120h) of the initial cycle of CT. No formal statistical comparisons were performed.
Results
The overall no emesis rates of > 80% for IV NEPA were similar to oral NEPA in both cisplatin and AC settings and were favorable in the context of historical NK1 RA regimens.Table:
1765P
Setting/Study | IV NEPA + DEX | Oral NEPA + DEX | APR + 5-HT3RA + DEX | FOS + 5-HT3RA + DEX | ROL + 5-HT3RA + DEX |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cisplatin | |||||
Schwartzberg 2018 | 84.2% | 88.6% | - | - | |
Hesketh 2014 | - | 91.1% | - | - | |
Zhang 2018 | - | 75.0% | - | - | |
Grunberg 2011 | - | - | 74.6% | 72.9% | |
Hesketh 2003 | - | - | 77.7% | - | - |
Poli-Bigelli 2003 | - | - | 66% | - | - |
Schmoll 2006 | - | - | 76.5% | - | - |
Saito 2013 | - | - | - | 67.6% | - |
Rapoport 2015 (HEC-1) | - | - | - | - | 75% |
Rapoport 2015 (HEC-2) | - | - | - | - | 71% |
AC | |||||
Schwartzberg 2019 | 82.5% | 86.1% | - | - | - |
Aapro 2014 | - | 79.8% | - | - | - |
Warr 2005 | - | - | 76% | - | - |
Schwartzberg 2016 | - | - | - | - | 72.4% |
Conclusions
Both IV and oral formulations of NEPA along with DEX represent highly effective guideline-compliant single-dose antiemetics.
Clinical trial identification
NCT03403712.
Editorial acknowledgement
Jennifer Vanden Burgt, Minneapolis, MN, funded by Helsinn Healthcare, Lugano, Switzerland.
Legal entity responsible for the study
Helsinn Healthcare.
Funding
Helsinn Healthcare.
Disclosure
L. Schwartzberg: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Helsinn Healthcare ; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Tesaro; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck ; Advisory / Consultancy: Heron. M.S. Aapro: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Helsinn Healthcare; Advisory / Consultancy: Mundipharma; Advisory / Consultancy: Tesaro; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck; Advisory / Consultancy: G1 Therapeutics.
Resources from the same session
5239 - Treatment patterns and outcomes for patients (pts) with anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive (ALK+) advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in US clinical practice
Presenter: Matthew Krebs
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5595 - Is there any prognostic significance in pleural involvement and/or effusion (Ple-I/E) in patients with ALK-positive NSCLC?
Presenter: Saadettin Kilickap
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5840 - Crizotinib in patients with advanced or metastatic ROS1-rearranged lung cancer (EUCROSS): A European phase 2 clinical trial – Updated progression-free survival, overall survival and mechanisms of resistance
Presenter: Sebastian Michels
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1905 - NTRK1-3 Genomic Fusions in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Determined by Comprehensive Genomic Profiling
Presenter: Sai-Hong Ou
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3016 - Preferential expression of the affected MET allele in lung carcinomas with heterozygous MET exon 14 skipping mutations: implications for clinical testing
Presenter: Evgeny Imyanitov
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4120 - Brain metastases, treatment patterns and outcomes in ROS1-positive NSCLC patients from US oncology community centers
Presenter: Matthew G Krebs
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3764 - Patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer and targetable molecular alterations in Germany. Treatment and first outcome data from the prospective German Registry Platform CRISP (AIO-TRK-0315)
Presenter: Frank Griesinger
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4070 - Crizotinib vs Platinum-based Chemotherapy as First-line Treatment for Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer with Different ROS1 Fusion Variants
Presenter: Haiyan Xu
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5528 - Genomic and clinical characterization of Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients harboring mutations in FGFR2 and FGFR3
Presenter: Matthias Scheffler
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3779 - The expression of HER2-gene polymorphisms -1985G>T and P1170A C>G and their association with the risk of development of lung adenocarcinoma
Presenter: Ivan Aleric
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract