Abstract 920
Background
The antiemetic standard of care recommended by guidelines for prevention of CINV in patients receiving cisplatin- and AC-based CT is the combination of an NK1 RA, a 5-HT3 RA, and dexamethasone (DEX). An IV formulation of NEPA (fixed combination of the NK1 RA, fosnetupitant and 5-HT3 RA, palonosetron) was recently approved in the US and is under review in Europe. Approval of IV NEPA was based on showing pharmacokinetic bioequivalence of IV fosnetupitant to oral netupitant and similar safety of IV NEPA to oral NEPA in a phase III study in patients receiving cisplatin-based CT. An IV/oral NEPA safety-controlled phase IIIb study was recently completed in patients receiving AC CT. In both studies, there were no injection-site or hypersensitivity reactions associated with IV NEPA. This secondary analysis presents the efficacy of IV NEPA relative to that of oral NEPA and other NK1 RAs in cisplatin and AC settings.
Methods
Data is compiled from 5 pivotal NEPA studies in a total of 2077 adult chemotherapy-naïve patients with solid tumors undergoing either cisplatin- or AC-based CT. IV NEPA was administered as a single 30-min infusion; oral NEPA was given as a single capsule 60 min prior to CT. Patients also received DEX. Data was also reviewed from 9 phase III cisplatin and AC studies with other NK1 RA (aprepitant [APR], fosaprepitant [FOS], rolapitant [ROL]) regimens. No emesis rates are summarized for the overall phase (0-120h) of the initial cycle of CT. No formal statistical comparisons were performed.
Results
The overall no emesis rates of > 80% for IV NEPA were similar to oral NEPA in both cisplatin and AC settings and were favorable in the context of historical NK1 RA regimens.Table:
1765P
Setting/Study | IV NEPA + DEX | Oral NEPA + DEX | APR + 5-HT3RA + DEX | FOS + 5-HT3RA + DEX | ROL + 5-HT3RA + DEX |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cisplatin | |||||
Schwartzberg 2018 | 84.2% | 88.6% | - | - | |
Hesketh 2014 | - | 91.1% | - | - | |
Zhang 2018 | - | 75.0% | - | - | |
Grunberg 2011 | - | - | 74.6% | 72.9% | |
Hesketh 2003 | - | - | 77.7% | - | - |
Poli-Bigelli 2003 | - | - | 66% | - | - |
Schmoll 2006 | - | - | 76.5% | - | - |
Saito 2013 | - | - | - | 67.6% | - |
Rapoport 2015 (HEC-1) | - | - | - | - | 75% |
Rapoport 2015 (HEC-2) | - | - | - | - | 71% |
AC | |||||
Schwartzberg 2019 | 82.5% | 86.1% | - | - | - |
Aapro 2014 | - | 79.8% | - | - | - |
Warr 2005 | - | - | 76% | - | - |
Schwartzberg 2016 | - | - | - | - | 72.4% |
Conclusions
Both IV and oral formulations of NEPA along with DEX represent highly effective guideline-compliant single-dose antiemetics.
Clinical trial identification
NCT03403712.
Editorial acknowledgement
Jennifer Vanden Burgt, Minneapolis, MN, funded by Helsinn Healthcare, Lugano, Switzerland.
Legal entity responsible for the study
Helsinn Healthcare.
Funding
Helsinn Healthcare.
Disclosure
L. Schwartzberg: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Helsinn Healthcare ; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Tesaro; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck ; Advisory / Consultancy: Heron. M.S. Aapro: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Helsinn Healthcare; Advisory / Consultancy: Mundipharma; Advisory / Consultancy: Tesaro; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck; Advisory / Consultancy: G1 Therapeutics.
Resources from the same session
681 - Significance of the red blood cell distribution width in resected pathological stage I non-small cell lung cancer
Presenter: Gouji Toyokawa
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3336 - Survival outcome of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients: Comparing results between the database of the Comprehensive Cancer Center Zürich (CCCZ) and the Epidemiological Cancer Registry Zurich and Zug (KKR)
Presenter: Rolf A. Stahel
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2204 - NORA trial (GECP 15/02): Updated results of the Spanish Lung Cancer Group (SLCG) phase II trial of concurrent chemo-radiotherapy (CT-RT) with cisplatin (P) plus metronomic oral vinorelbine (mOV) for unresectable locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC)
Presenter: María Guirado
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1446 - A nomogram to predict outcomes of lung cancer patients after pneumonectomy based on 47 indicators set by principle component analysis
Presenter: Bo Cheng
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1788 - Prognostic and predictive value of 18F-PET/CT on the response to treatment in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
Presenter: Cristina Alfaro Autor
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2299 - Comparison of three different chemotherapy regimens for concomitant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced non small cell lung cancer
Presenter: Abdurrahman Işıkdoğan
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4211 - Predicting the first failure pattern in patients with inoperable local advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) receiving definitive chemoradiotherapy: Establishment and internal validation of a nomogram based on the clinicopathological factors
Presenter: Xueru Zhu
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1550 - Prognostic impact of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) pre and post chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
Presenter: Vicente Palomar Abril
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2345 - Meta-analysis evaluating neutropenia incidence with EGFR inhibitors and chemotherapy in patients with NSCLC
Presenter: Bernardo Rapoport
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3747 - Effector CD4+ T-cell induction by thoracic radiotherapy for patients with NSCLC
Presenter: Yu Miura
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract