Abstract 920
Background
The antiemetic standard of care recommended by guidelines for prevention of CINV in patients receiving cisplatin- and AC-based CT is the combination of an NK1 RA, a 5-HT3 RA, and dexamethasone (DEX). An IV formulation of NEPA (fixed combination of the NK1 RA, fosnetupitant and 5-HT3 RA, palonosetron) was recently approved in the US and is under review in Europe. Approval of IV NEPA was based on showing pharmacokinetic bioequivalence of IV fosnetupitant to oral netupitant and similar safety of IV NEPA to oral NEPA in a phase III study in patients receiving cisplatin-based CT. An IV/oral NEPA safety-controlled phase IIIb study was recently completed in patients receiving AC CT. In both studies, there were no injection-site or hypersensitivity reactions associated with IV NEPA. This secondary analysis presents the efficacy of IV NEPA relative to that of oral NEPA and other NK1 RAs in cisplatin and AC settings.
Methods
Data is compiled from 5 pivotal NEPA studies in a total of 2077 adult chemotherapy-naïve patients with solid tumors undergoing either cisplatin- or AC-based CT. IV NEPA was administered as a single 30-min infusion; oral NEPA was given as a single capsule 60 min prior to CT. Patients also received DEX. Data was also reviewed from 9 phase III cisplatin and AC studies with other NK1 RA (aprepitant [APR], fosaprepitant [FOS], rolapitant [ROL]) regimens. No emesis rates are summarized for the overall phase (0-120h) of the initial cycle of CT. No formal statistical comparisons were performed.
Results
The overall no emesis rates of > 80% for IV NEPA were similar to oral NEPA in both cisplatin and AC settings and were favorable in the context of historical NK1 RA regimens.Table:
1765P
Setting/Study | IV NEPA + DEX | Oral NEPA + DEX | APR + 5-HT3RA + DEX | FOS + 5-HT3RA + DEX | ROL + 5-HT3RA + DEX |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cisplatin | |||||
Schwartzberg 2018 | 84.2% | 88.6% | - | - | |
Hesketh 2014 | - | 91.1% | - | - | |
Zhang 2018 | - | 75.0% | - | - | |
Grunberg 2011 | - | - | 74.6% | 72.9% | |
Hesketh 2003 | - | - | 77.7% | - | - |
Poli-Bigelli 2003 | - | - | 66% | - | - |
Schmoll 2006 | - | - | 76.5% | - | - |
Saito 2013 | - | - | - | 67.6% | - |
Rapoport 2015 (HEC-1) | - | - | - | - | 75% |
Rapoport 2015 (HEC-2) | - | - | - | - | 71% |
AC | |||||
Schwartzberg 2019 | 82.5% | 86.1% | - | - | - |
Aapro 2014 | - | 79.8% | - | - | - |
Warr 2005 | - | - | 76% | - | - |
Schwartzberg 2016 | - | - | - | - | 72.4% |
Conclusions
Both IV and oral formulations of NEPA along with DEX represent highly effective guideline-compliant single-dose antiemetics.
Clinical trial identification
NCT03403712.
Editorial acknowledgement
Jennifer Vanden Burgt, Minneapolis, MN, funded by Helsinn Healthcare, Lugano, Switzerland.
Legal entity responsible for the study
Helsinn Healthcare.
Funding
Helsinn Healthcare.
Disclosure
L. Schwartzberg: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Helsinn Healthcare ; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Tesaro; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck ; Advisory / Consultancy: Heron. M.S. Aapro: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Helsinn Healthcare; Advisory / Consultancy: Mundipharma; Advisory / Consultancy: Tesaro; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck; Advisory / Consultancy: G1 Therapeutics.
Resources from the same session
3317 - Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis in patients (pts) with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with telisotuzumab vedotin (teliso-v), an antibody-drug conjugate targeting c-Met
Presenter: Rebecca Heist
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3887 - First Real Life Data on Durvalumab after definitive concomitant ChemoRadiotherapy (cCRT) in unresectable Stage (St) III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) in France: Analysis of 591 patients (pts) enrolled in the French cohort (c) Temporary Authorization of Use (ATU)
Presenter: Virginie Avrillon
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
682 - EGFR Inhibitor Versus Chemotherapy as Adjuvant Treatment for Locally-advanced EGFR-mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Presenter: Peng Xie
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2509 - Afatinib in EGFR TKI-naïve patients with EGFR mutation-positive (EGFRm+) NSCLC: interim analysis of a Phase IIIb, multi-national, open-label study
Presenter: Filippo de Marinis
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3300 - First-line ceritinib versus chemotherapy in patients (pts) with advanced ALK rearranged (ALK+) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): ASCEND-4 Asian subgroup analysis
Presenter: Daniel SW Tan
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2653 - A combined analysis of two Phase IIIb studies of afatinib in EGFR TKI-naïve patients (pts) with EGFR mutation-positive (EGFRm+) NSCLC
Presenter: Filippo de Marinis
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3663 - Impact of plasma EGFR mutation fractions on response to first generation tyrosine-kinase inhibitor in treatment of naïve non-small cell lung cancer patients
Presenter: Xiaohong Wang
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5921 - Definition of an afatinib trough concentration threshold in the treatment of NSCLC
Presenter: Stephane Bouchet
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2852 - A Phase Ib Trial of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy and Durvalumab(MEDI4736) for Potentially Resectable stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Presenter: Beung chul AHN
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3273 - Low expression of Notch1 and combined Notch1/HES1 are associated with adverse survival factor for limited stage small cell lung cancer
Presenter: Jinsoo Lee
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract