Abstract 920
Background
The antiemetic standard of care recommended by guidelines for prevention of CINV in patients receiving cisplatin- and AC-based CT is the combination of an NK1 RA, a 5-HT3 RA, and dexamethasone (DEX). An IV formulation of NEPA (fixed combination of the NK1 RA, fosnetupitant and 5-HT3 RA, palonosetron) was recently approved in the US and is under review in Europe. Approval of IV NEPA was based on showing pharmacokinetic bioequivalence of IV fosnetupitant to oral netupitant and similar safety of IV NEPA to oral NEPA in a phase III study in patients receiving cisplatin-based CT. An IV/oral NEPA safety-controlled phase IIIb study was recently completed in patients receiving AC CT. In both studies, there were no injection-site or hypersensitivity reactions associated with IV NEPA. This secondary analysis presents the efficacy of IV NEPA relative to that of oral NEPA and other NK1 RAs in cisplatin and AC settings.
Methods
Data is compiled from 5 pivotal NEPA studies in a total of 2077 adult chemotherapy-naïve patients with solid tumors undergoing either cisplatin- or AC-based CT. IV NEPA was administered as a single 30-min infusion; oral NEPA was given as a single capsule 60 min prior to CT. Patients also received DEX. Data was also reviewed from 9 phase III cisplatin and AC studies with other NK1 RA (aprepitant [APR], fosaprepitant [FOS], rolapitant [ROL]) regimens. No emesis rates are summarized for the overall phase (0-120h) of the initial cycle of CT. No formal statistical comparisons were performed.
Results
The overall no emesis rates of > 80% for IV NEPA were similar to oral NEPA in both cisplatin and AC settings and were favorable in the context of historical NK1 RA regimens.Table:
1765P
Setting/Study | IV NEPA + DEX | Oral NEPA + DEX | APR + 5-HT3RA + DEX | FOS + 5-HT3RA + DEX | ROL + 5-HT3RA + DEX |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cisplatin | |||||
Schwartzberg 2018 | 84.2% | 88.6% | - | - | |
Hesketh 2014 | - | 91.1% | - | - | |
Zhang 2018 | - | 75.0% | - | - | |
Grunberg 2011 | - | - | 74.6% | 72.9% | |
Hesketh 2003 | - | - | 77.7% | - | - |
Poli-Bigelli 2003 | - | - | 66% | - | - |
Schmoll 2006 | - | - | 76.5% | - | - |
Saito 2013 | - | - | - | 67.6% | - |
Rapoport 2015 (HEC-1) | - | - | - | - | 75% |
Rapoport 2015 (HEC-2) | - | - | - | - | 71% |
AC | |||||
Schwartzberg 2019 | 82.5% | 86.1% | - | - | - |
Aapro 2014 | - | 79.8% | - | - | - |
Warr 2005 | - | - | 76% | - | - |
Schwartzberg 2016 | - | - | - | - | 72.4% |
Conclusions
Both IV and oral formulations of NEPA along with DEX represent highly effective guideline-compliant single-dose antiemetics.
Clinical trial identification
NCT03403712.
Editorial acknowledgement
Jennifer Vanden Burgt, Minneapolis, MN, funded by Helsinn Healthcare, Lugano, Switzerland.
Legal entity responsible for the study
Helsinn Healthcare.
Funding
Helsinn Healthcare.
Disclosure
L. Schwartzberg: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Helsinn Healthcare ; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Tesaro; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck ; Advisory / Consultancy: Heron. M.S. Aapro: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Helsinn Healthcare; Advisory / Consultancy: Mundipharma; Advisory / Consultancy: Tesaro; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck; Advisory / Consultancy: G1 Therapeutics.
Resources from the same session
5054 - Inhibition of Rspo-Wnt pathway Facilitates Checkpoint Blockade Therapy by anti-RSPO3 antibody (DBPR117)
Presenter: John Hsu
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3305 - A phase I dose-escalation and expansion trial of intratumorally administered CV8102, alone and in combination with anti-PD-1 in patients with advanced solid tumors
Presenter: Jürgen Krauss
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5353 - Phase 1/2 Study of 9-ING-41, a small molecule selective Glycogen Synthase Kinase-3 Beta (GSK-3β) Inhibitor, as a Single Agent and Combined with Chemotherapy, in Patients with Refractory Hematological Malignancies or Solid Tumors
Presenter: Benedito Carneiro
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3946 - Trial in progress: a Phase I, open-label study of GSK1795091 administered in combination with immunotherapies in participants with advanced solid tumors (NCT03447314).
Presenter: Aaron Hansen
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3449 - Radiographic Phenotyping to Identify Intracranial Disseminated Recurrence in Brain metastases Treated With Radiosurgery Using Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging
Presenter: CheYu Hsu
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4553 - Association between TP53 mutations and efficacy of Osimertinib for brain metastasis from EGFR-mutant lung cancer
Presenter: Lijuan Chen
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4942 - Response assessment of melanoma brain metastases treated by stereotactic radiotherapy or immunotherapy or both: a comparison of RECIST 1.1, RANO and iRANO criteria
Presenter: Emilie Le Rhun
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3529 - Management of multiple brain metastases by Staged SRS focusing on utmost risk lesions
Presenter: shaoqun Li
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5315 - Whole brain radiotherapy plus simultaneous in-field boost versus whole brain radiotherapy plus fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for multiple brain metastases of non-small cell lung cancer
Presenter: Lu Li
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1116 - 3D based texture analysis serving as potential diagnostic factor in discriminating primary central nervous system lymphoma from metastatic brain tumors: A preliminary study
Presenter: Wen Guo
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract