Abstract 920
Background
The antiemetic standard of care recommended by guidelines for prevention of CINV in patients receiving cisplatin- and AC-based CT is the combination of an NK1 RA, a 5-HT3 RA, and dexamethasone (DEX). An IV formulation of NEPA (fixed combination of the NK1 RA, fosnetupitant and 5-HT3 RA, palonosetron) was recently approved in the US and is under review in Europe. Approval of IV NEPA was based on showing pharmacokinetic bioequivalence of IV fosnetupitant to oral netupitant and similar safety of IV NEPA to oral NEPA in a phase III study in patients receiving cisplatin-based CT. An IV/oral NEPA safety-controlled phase IIIb study was recently completed in patients receiving AC CT. In both studies, there were no injection-site or hypersensitivity reactions associated with IV NEPA. This secondary analysis presents the efficacy of IV NEPA relative to that of oral NEPA and other NK1 RAs in cisplatin and AC settings.
Methods
Data is compiled from 5 pivotal NEPA studies in a total of 2077 adult chemotherapy-naïve patients with solid tumors undergoing either cisplatin- or AC-based CT. IV NEPA was administered as a single 30-min infusion; oral NEPA was given as a single capsule 60 min prior to CT. Patients also received DEX. Data was also reviewed from 9 phase III cisplatin and AC studies with other NK1 RA (aprepitant [APR], fosaprepitant [FOS], rolapitant [ROL]) regimens. No emesis rates are summarized for the overall phase (0-120h) of the initial cycle of CT. No formal statistical comparisons were performed.
Results
The overall no emesis rates of > 80% for IV NEPA were similar to oral NEPA in both cisplatin and AC settings and were favorable in the context of historical NK1 RA regimens.Table:
1765P
Setting/Study | IV NEPA + DEX | Oral NEPA + DEX | APR + 5-HT3RA + DEX | FOS + 5-HT3RA + DEX | ROL + 5-HT3RA + DEX |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cisplatin | |||||
Schwartzberg 2018 | 84.2% | 88.6% | - | - | |
Hesketh 2014 | - | 91.1% | - | - | |
Zhang 2018 | - | 75.0% | - | - | |
Grunberg 2011 | - | - | 74.6% | 72.9% | |
Hesketh 2003 | - | - | 77.7% | - | - |
Poli-Bigelli 2003 | - | - | 66% | - | - |
Schmoll 2006 | - | - | 76.5% | - | - |
Saito 2013 | - | - | - | 67.6% | - |
Rapoport 2015 (HEC-1) | - | - | - | - | 75% |
Rapoport 2015 (HEC-2) | - | - | - | - | 71% |
AC | |||||
Schwartzberg 2019 | 82.5% | 86.1% | - | - | - |
Aapro 2014 | - | 79.8% | - | - | - |
Warr 2005 | - | - | 76% | - | - |
Schwartzberg 2016 | - | - | - | - | 72.4% |
Conclusions
Both IV and oral formulations of NEPA along with DEX represent highly effective guideline-compliant single-dose antiemetics.
Clinical trial identification
NCT03403712.
Editorial acknowledgement
Jennifer Vanden Burgt, Minneapolis, MN, funded by Helsinn Healthcare, Lugano, Switzerland.
Legal entity responsible for the study
Helsinn Healthcare.
Funding
Helsinn Healthcare.
Disclosure
L. Schwartzberg: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Helsinn Healthcare ; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Tesaro; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck ; Advisory / Consultancy: Heron. M.S. Aapro: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Helsinn Healthcare; Advisory / Consultancy: Mundipharma; Advisory / Consultancy: Tesaro; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck; Advisory / Consultancy: G1 Therapeutics.
Resources from the same session
5141 - Mutational profiling of tumor tissue and sequential plasma illustrates emergent clones during treatment in late stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC)
Presenter: Stephanie Yaung
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5189 - Association between serum HGF levels and neutrophil counts in small cell lung cancer and their impact on survival
Presenter: Laura Moliner
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3539 - Prognostic role of RLF/MYCL1 and circPVT1 in SCLC.
Presenter: Clelia Tiziana Storlazzi
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3438 - High-biologically effective dose radiotherapy improve the survival of small cell lung cancer patients with brain metastases: a propensity-matching analysis
Presenter: Qingyang Zhuang
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3232 - Phase 1 open-label study evaluating the safety, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary efficacy of ABBV-181 and rovalpituzumab tesirine (ROVA-T) in patients with small cell lung cancer
Presenter: Emiliano Calvo
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3633 - Activity of the novel Aurora kinase B inhibitor AZD2811 in biomarker-defined models of small cell lung cancer
Presenter: Carminia Maria Della Corte
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3745 - Multi-level proteomics identifies FABP5 as a primary chemoresistance mediator in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer
Presenter: Yamei Chen
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5049 - CLEPSIDRA trial: a pilot, biomarker-guided study to assess safety, tolerability, dose finding and efficacy of iadademstat in combination with platinum-etoposide in patients with relapsed, extensive-stage small cell lung cancer
Presenter: Alejandro Navarro Mendivil
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5997 - Phased Avelumab combined with chemotherapy as first-line treatment for patients with advanced small-cell lung cancer (SCLC): The PAVE study, a Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group Study
Presenter: Helena Linardou
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4502 - Tobacco use in lung cáncer (LC) patients (p) in Spain
Presenter: Enric Carcereny Costa
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract