Abstract 2512
Background
Activation of AXL receptor tyrosine kinase is a key mediator of epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT). AXL is overexpressed in several human cancers, including CRC.
Methods
AXL expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry in tumor samples from 346 mCRC pts treated at three Institutions and enrolled in different clinical trials (CAPRI, MACBETH, MOMA, TRIBE2). In silico data of AXL RNA levels were obtained from GSE5851 dataset, including 80 pts with advanced mCRC treated with cetuximab in a later line.
Results
AXL expression was found in 18% of cases within tumor cells, with no difference among RAS cohorts. In the RAS WT group, AXL positive pts had a worse mPFS whether treated with chemotherapy (CT) + anti-EGFR [6.2 m (CI95% 4.2- 8.2) vs 12.1 m (CI95% 10.6 – 13.6) p 0.012] or CT+anti-angiogenic agent [6.7 m (CI95% 8.9- 19.3) vs 14.1 m (CI95% 9.4– 13.0) p 0.007], whereas in RAS mutant pts no impact on PFS was observed. AXL expression correlated with worse mOS in both cohorts; notably, in RAS WT pts mOS was 19.9 m (CI95% 10.5- 29.2) vs 37.6 m (CI95% 31.1– 44.1) p 0.006]. In tumor stroma, assessable in 334 samples, AXL was expressed in 80% of cases, with no difference among RAS groups. AXL expression correlated with lower mOS in both cohorts. (Table) Intriguingly, AXL expression in tumor and stroma (+/+) correlated with shorter mOS; in particular, RAS WT pts (+/+) had a mOS of 19.9 m (CI95% 8.0- 31.7) vs (-/-) 50.1 m (CI95% 43.9- 56.2) p 0.004]. In silico analyses showed high AXL RNA levels in 50% of pts. Moreover, in this population treated with cetuximab, in the KRAS exon2 WT cohort (N = 43) AXL high pts had worse mPFS [1.9 m (CI95% 1.7 -2.0) vs 3.8 m (CI95% 0.7-6.7) p 0.59].Table: 121P
Cohort | AXL expression in tumor cells | AXL expression in stroma | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | Negative <1% (%) | Positive ≥1% (%) | PFS months p value | OS months p value | N | Negative <1% (%) | Positive ≥1% (%) | PFS months p value | OS months p value | |
Overall population | 346 | 285 (82) | 61 (18) | 10.7 vs 8.0 0.008 | 32.4 vs 23.0 0.007 | 334 | 66 (20) | 268 (80) | 10.7 vs 8.0 0.11 | 41.1 vs 28.5 0.004 |
RAS WT (overall) | 175 | 147 (84) | 28 (16) | 12.3 vs 6.6 <0.000 | 37.6 vs 19.9 0.006 | 167 | 33 (20) | 134 (80) | 15.0 vs 10.7 0.034 | 49.8 vs 33.5 0.031 |
RAS WT CT + anti-EGFR | 136 | 114 (84) | 22 (16) | 12.1 vs 6.2 0.012 | 35.8 vs 23.0 0.087 | 129 | 18 (14) | 111 (86) | 14.3 vs 10.4 0.37 | 44.4 vs 33.5 0.11 |
RAS WT CT + anti-angiogenic | 39 | 33 (85) | 6 (15) | 14.1 vs 6.7 0.007 | 44.8 vs 13.2 0.004 | 38 | 15 (39) | 23 (61) | 15.0 vs 11.0 0.12 | 50.1 vs 40.6 0.17 |
RAS mut (overall) CT + anti-angiogenic | 171 | 138 (81) | 33 (19) | 9.6 vs 8.9 0.78 | 27.6 vs 23.7 0.33 | 167 | 33 (20) | 134 (80) | 9.7 vs 9.2 0.98 | 35.5 vs 24.7 0.056 |
Conclusions
AXL expression in tumor and stroma might have a negative prognostic relevance in mCRC. In RAS WT pts, AXL expression might represent a predictive biomarker of lack of efficacy for both anti-EGFR and anti-angiogenic agents.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Department of Precision Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli".
Funding
AIRC MFAG-2015-ID: 7778.
Disclosure
F. Ciardiello: Advisory / Consultancy, Advisory Board: Merck KgA, Bayer, Amgen, Roche, Servier, Pfizer. E. Martinelli: Advisory / Consultancy: Merck KgA, Amgen, Bayer, Roche, Sanofi, Servier. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2436 - Development and Validation of an RNA-Seq Assay for Gene Fusions Detection in Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded Samples
Presenter: Hua Dong
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5271 - A Pilot Study to Implement an Artificial Intelligence (AI) System for Gastrointestinal Cancer Clinical Trial Matching
Presenter: Zhaohui Jin
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4787 - A Blinded Comparison of Patient Treatments to Therapeutic Options Presented by an Artificial Intelligence-based Clinical Decision-support system
Presenter: Suthida Suwanvecho
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5744 - OncOS: scalable and accurate next-generation sequencing analytics for precision oncology and personalized patient care
Presenter: Joe Thompson
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3752 - The association between wearable device physical activity metrics and performance status in oncology: a systematic review
Presenter: Milan Kos
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5820 - SomaticNET: neural network evaluation of somatic mutations in cancer
Presenter: Geoffroy Dubourg-Felonneau
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4771 - Is there a role for Next-generation sequencing (NGS) profiling on metastatic non-colorectal gastrointestinal carcinomas (MNCGIC) in developing countries? A single center experience.
Presenter: Mauricio Ribeiro
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1209 - Metastatic Cancer Whole-Exome Sequencing in daily practice
Presenter: Manon Réda
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5702 - Genomic-Guided Individualized Precision Therapy in Refractory Metastatic Solid Tumor Patients with Extensively Poor Performance Status: A Chinese single institutional prospective observational real-world study
Presenter: Haitao Wang
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4021 - Prospective pathological experience with research biopsies in the context of clinical trials at Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology
Presenter: Paolo Nuciforo
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract