Abstract 5271
Background
Clinical trials improve our knowledge of diseases and treatments while providing patients access to investigational agents. However, approximately 3% of newly diagnosed cancer patients are enrolled in clinical trials in the United States. Identifying an appropriate trial for a patient is time-consuming and cumbersome in the busy clinical practice. The Watson for Clinical Trial Matching (CTM) cognitive system uses AI to derive patient and cancer-related attributes from structured and unstructured text found in the electronic health record. These attributes are matched to complex eligibility criteria in clinical trial protocols.
Methods
In April 2019, a pilot study was launched to test the feasibility of implementing CTM in Gastrointestinal (GI) oncology at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, MN. Two clinical research coordinators (CRCs) screened patients for potential clinical trials prior to their clinic visits using both CTM and the traditional manual screening method. To avoid bias, each CRC screened a separate set of patients by both methods alternating which methodology was used first. The clinical trial match results were blinded to both CRCs. For each method, time to complete the screen and number of potential clinical trial matches were recorded.
Results
A total of 35 GI cancer patients with new diagnosis, recent resection or restaging scans were analyzed. Patients were evaluated against 50 GI-specific drug therapy and multi-disease phase I clinical trials. Clinical trial matching using CTM took an average of 10.1 minutes (Range: 4 to 20 min) per patient compared to an average of 30.5 minutes (Range: 5 to 75 min) per patient (p < 0.0001) using the manual method. CTM identified an average of 7.66 clinical trials (Range: 0-16) while the manual screening method identified an average of 1.97 clinical trials (Range: 0 to 6) per patient (p < 0.0001).
Conclusions
Implementation of Watson for CTM system with a CRC team may enable high volume patient screening for a large number of clinical trials in an efficient manner and promote awareness of clinical trial opportunities within the GI oncology practice. Further analysis to evaluate CTM accuracy and impact on enrollment is warranted and currently underway.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Mayo Clinic.
Disclosure
T. Haddad: Advisory / Consultancy: TerSera Therapeautics; Research grant / Funding (self): Takeda. S. Coverdill: Full / Part-time employment: IBM Watson Health; Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: IBM. M. Rammage: Full / Part-time employment: IBM Watson Health; Licensing / Royalties: IBM. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
5520 - Patient’s Usability Test results of a CINV Diary Application For Smartphones
Presenter: Paz Fernandez
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2323 - Colorectal Telephone Assessment Pathway (CTAP) - A viable means of shortening time to a definitive diagnosis of Colorectal Cancer (CRC)
Presenter: Harriet Watson
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
6119 - Cancer Nursing and Social Media: Capturing the Zeitgeist
Presenter: Mark Foulkes
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1776 - Examination of mobile applications on breast cancer
Presenter: AYDANUR AYDIN
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4128 - E-health effectiveness to increase patient adherence for immunotherapy; a cost-benefit study.
Presenter: Maria José Dias
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3219 - Experiences of internet-based stepped care among individuals with recently diagnosed cancer and symptoms of anxiety and/or depression
Presenter: Anna Hauffman
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5010 - What do cancer patients know about their immunotherapy treatment?
Presenter: Mónica Arellano
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4503 - Prospective Comparison of Travel Burden, Cost and Time to Obtain Tumor Board Treatment Plan Through In-Person Visits vs. an AI Enabled Health Technology (N=1803)
Presenter: Rajendra Badwe
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4123 - Cancer care through the fire and flames: 3-year experience in the utilisation of electronic consultation and referral system at the Red Zone in Southern Thailand
Presenter: Nanthiya Rattanakhot
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2087 - The effect of e-mobile education on the quality of life in women with breast cancer
Presenter: Derya ÇInar
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract