Abstract 2512
Background
Activation of AXL receptor tyrosine kinase is a key mediator of epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT). AXL is overexpressed in several human cancers, including CRC.
Methods
AXL expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry in tumor samples from 346 mCRC pts treated at three Institutions and enrolled in different clinical trials (CAPRI, MACBETH, MOMA, TRIBE2). In silico data of AXL RNA levels were obtained from GSE5851 dataset, including 80 pts with advanced mCRC treated with cetuximab in a later line.
Results
AXL expression was found in 18% of cases within tumor cells, with no difference among RAS cohorts. In the RAS WT group, AXL positive pts had a worse mPFS whether treated with chemotherapy (CT) + anti-EGFR [6.2 m (CI95% 4.2- 8.2) vs 12.1 m (CI95% 10.6 – 13.6) p 0.012] or CT+anti-angiogenic agent [6.7 m (CI95% 8.9- 19.3) vs 14.1 m (CI95% 9.4– 13.0) p 0.007], whereas in RAS mutant pts no impact on PFS was observed. AXL expression correlated with worse mOS in both cohorts; notably, in RAS WT pts mOS was 19.9 m (CI95% 10.5- 29.2) vs 37.6 m (CI95% 31.1– 44.1) p 0.006]. In tumor stroma, assessable in 334 samples, AXL was expressed in 80% of cases, with no difference among RAS groups. AXL expression correlated with lower mOS in both cohorts. (Table) Intriguingly, AXL expression in tumor and stroma (+/+) correlated with shorter mOS; in particular, RAS WT pts (+/+) had a mOS of 19.9 m (CI95% 8.0- 31.7) vs (-/-) 50.1 m (CI95% 43.9- 56.2) p 0.004]. In silico analyses showed high AXL RNA levels in 50% of pts. Moreover, in this population treated with cetuximab, in the KRAS exon2 WT cohort (N = 43) AXL high pts had worse mPFS [1.9 m (CI95% 1.7 -2.0) vs 3.8 m (CI95% 0.7-6.7) p 0.59].Table: 121P
Cohort | AXL expression in tumor cells | AXL expression in stroma | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | Negative <1% (%) | Positive ≥1% (%) | PFS months p value | OS months p value | N | Negative <1% (%) | Positive ≥1% (%) | PFS months p value | OS months p value | |
Overall population | 346 | 285 (82) | 61 (18) | 10.7 vs 8.0 0.008 | 32.4 vs 23.0 0.007 | 334 | 66 (20) | 268 (80) | 10.7 vs 8.0 0.11 | 41.1 vs 28.5 0.004 |
RAS WT (overall) | 175 | 147 (84) | 28 (16) | 12.3 vs 6.6 <0.000 | 37.6 vs 19.9 0.006 | 167 | 33 (20) | 134 (80) | 15.0 vs 10.7 0.034 | 49.8 vs 33.5 0.031 |
RAS WT CT + anti-EGFR | 136 | 114 (84) | 22 (16) | 12.1 vs 6.2 0.012 | 35.8 vs 23.0 0.087 | 129 | 18 (14) | 111 (86) | 14.3 vs 10.4 0.37 | 44.4 vs 33.5 0.11 |
RAS WT CT + anti-angiogenic | 39 | 33 (85) | 6 (15) | 14.1 vs 6.7 0.007 | 44.8 vs 13.2 0.004 | 38 | 15 (39) | 23 (61) | 15.0 vs 11.0 0.12 | 50.1 vs 40.6 0.17 |
RAS mut (overall) CT + anti-angiogenic | 171 | 138 (81) | 33 (19) | 9.6 vs 8.9 0.78 | 27.6 vs 23.7 0.33 | 167 | 33 (20) | 134 (80) | 9.7 vs 9.2 0.98 | 35.5 vs 24.7 0.056 |
Conclusions
AXL expression in tumor and stroma might have a negative prognostic relevance in mCRC. In RAS WT pts, AXL expression might represent a predictive biomarker of lack of efficacy for both anti-EGFR and anti-angiogenic agents.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Department of Precision Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli".
Funding
AIRC MFAG-2015-ID: 7778.
Disclosure
F. Ciardiello: Advisory / Consultancy, Advisory Board: Merck KgA, Bayer, Amgen, Roche, Servier, Pfizer. E. Martinelli: Advisory / Consultancy: Merck KgA, Amgen, Bayer, Roche, Sanofi, Servier. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2655 - The K-BASKET trial: A prospective phase II biomarker-driven multiple basket trial in Korean solid cancer patients.
Presenter: Seul Kim
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5938 - Cambridge Liquid biopsy “CALIBRATION” study: Can changes in circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) predict durable tumour responses in patients with advanced oesophageal cancer receiving MEDI4736?
Presenter: Constanza Linossi
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3799 - Validation of a tumour mutational burden workflow on routine histological samples of colorectal cancer and assessment of a cohort with synchronous hepatic metastases
Presenter: Andrea Mafficini
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4647 - Microsatellite Instability Testing and Lynch Syndrome Screening For Colorectal Cancer Patients Through Tumor Sequencing
Presenter: Li Liu
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3231 - "Liquid Withdarw" technique in CT-guided cutting needle lung biopsy: decreased incidence of complications and increased tissue amount for lung cancer molecular testing.
Presenter: Xue Wang
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3282 - WGS Implementation in standard cancer Diagnostics for Every cancer patient (WIDE)
Presenter: Paul Roepman
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5905 - Known and unknown gene fusion detection capabilities of solid tumor laboratories conducting next generation sequencing in 6 countries
Presenter: Steph Finucane
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4238 - Clinical and Analytical Accuracy of a 523 Gene Panel Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) Assay on Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded (FFPE) Solid Tumor Samples
Presenter: Ina Deras
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2493 - Methylation analysis of MLH1 using droplet digital PCR and methylation sensitive restriction enzyme.
Presenter: Celine De Rop
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2963 - Analytical performance of the Resolution-HRD plasma assay used to identify mCRPC patients with biallelic disruption of DNA repair genes for treatment with niraparib
Presenter: Ira Pekker
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract