Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session 3

5820 - SomaticNET: neural network evaluation of somatic mutations in cancer

Date

30 Sep 2019

Session

Poster Display session 3

Topics

Translational Research

Tumour Site

Presenters

Geoffroy Dubourg-Felonneau

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2019) 30 (suppl_5): v574-v584. 10.1093/annonc/mdz257

Authors

G. Dubourg-Felonneau1, D. Rebergen2, C. Parsons2, H. Thompson2, J.W. Cassidy2, N. Patel2, H.W. Clifford2

Author affiliations

  • 1 Research And Development, Cambridge Cancer Genomics, CB2 1LA - Cambridge/GB
  • 2 Research And Development, Cambridge Cancer Genomics, Cambridge/GB

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 5820

Background

DNA sequencing to identify variants is becoming increasingly valuable in clinical settings; including matching patients to approved targeted therapies, immunotherapies, and/or clinical trials. However, accurate calling of genetic variants from sequencing still remains challenging. With little corroboration between the different tools available, patients are at risk of being treated with therapies that are unsuitable for their cancer.

Methods

Here we present a novel machine learning based method for the accurate identification of somatic variants in cancer patient tumour samples, with a neural network architecture from encoded raw sequencing read information of tumour/normal sample pairings into an image, enabling it to classify whether a variant is germline, somatic, or sequencing error. The model was trained and tested on in-silico spike-in data using bam-surgeon, and then validated on a multi-cancer and multi-center dataset and benchmarked against industry standard variant callers.

Results

The approach, called somaticNET, outperforms existing industry standard tools in sensitivity and specificity, achieving an AUROC of ∼1.00 on the bam-surgeon dataset and an AUROC of ∼0.99 on the multi-cancer multicenter dataset. The model also works faster than other variant callers, in minutes compared to hours.

Conclusions

Using the power of machine learning for accurate somatic variant calling can improve patient matching to approved therapies and clinical trials, thus ensuring patients are given the right therapy at the right time to treat their cancer.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Cambridge Cancer Genomics.

Disclosure

G. Dubourg-Felonneau: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: Cambridge Cancer Genomics. D. Rebergen: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: Cambridge Cancer Genomics. C. Parsons: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: Cambridge Cancer Genomics. H. Thompson: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: Cambridge Cancer Genomics. J.W. Cassidy: Leadership role, Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment, Officer / Board of Directors: Cambridge Cancer Genomics. N. Patel: Leadership role, Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: Cambridge Cancer Genomics. H.W. Clifford: Leadership role, Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: Cambridge Cancer Genomics.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.