Abstract 133P
Background
The aim of this study was to compare the treatment failure patterns after laparoscopic (LG) and open gastrectomy (OG) in locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC).
Methods
A total of 1792 LAGC patients who underwent radical resection between January 2010 and December 2016 were divided into an LG group (n=1557) and OG group (n=235). Propensity score matching was performed to balance the two groups. Dynamic hazard rates of failure were calculated using the hazard function.
Results
A total of 1175 LAGC patients were included after matching (LG group, n=940; OG, n=235). The treatment failure rate of the whole group was 43.23% (508/1175), accounting for 41.38% (389/940) and 50.64% (119/235) in the LG and OG groups, respectively. The static treatment failure pattern showed that only distant recurrence rate of the LG group was significantly lower than that of the OG group (22.02% vs. 28.94%, P=0.025). Landmark analysis showed a lower early treatment failure rate of the LG group in stage Ib-IIIb subgroup (P=0.004). Furthermore, dynamic hazard curve peaked at 9.4 months (Peak rate=0.0186) and then gradually declined. For stage Ⅰb to Ⅲb patients, time of peak failure hazard was 5.2 months earlier in the OG group (OG versus LG: 11.0 versus 16.2 months). Finally, LG was an independent protective factor associated with early treatment failure in stage Ib-IIIb patients (hazard ratio, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.43-0.93; P=0.019).
Conclusions
Given the differences in treatment failure patterns between LG and OG, shorter-interval surveillance for the first 2 years should be considered for stage Ib-IIIb patients after OG.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Scientific and Technological Innovation Joint Capital Projects of Fujian Province.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
14P - BRCA mutation and clinical outcomes in breast cancer focusing on survivals and failure patterns: A long-term follow-up study of Koreans
Presenter: Hakyoung Kim
Session: e-Poster Display Session
15P - Designing of multimodal targeted tumor-seeking nanomedicine for triple-therapeutic effect
Presenter: Vellingiri Yasothamani
Session: e-Poster Display Session
16P - Topical henna cream in prevention of radiation-induced dermatitis in breast cancer: A randomized double-blind clinical trial
Presenter: Mansour Lesan
Session: e-Poster Display Session
17P - Comparison of dose distribution in the postoperative breast cancer patients irradiated with the technique of deep inspiratory breath hold and dynamic techniques
Presenter: Ewa Telka
Session: e-Poster Display Session
18P - A prospective randomized study comparing cosmetic outcome of sequential electron boost versus simultaneous integrated boost with IMRT to lumpectomy cavity during adjuvant radiotherapy to breast following BCS in carcinoma breast in Indian patients
Presenter: Sravya Bommera
Session: e-Poster Display Session
19P - Musculoskeletal pain and health-related quality of life among breast cancer patients
Presenter: Aslin Valiyagath
Session: e-Poster Display Session
20P - Molecular parallelisms and divergences between human and canine cancers
Presenter: Sadaf Ambreen
Session: e-Poster Display Session
21P - Neoadjuvant trastuzumab and pertuzumab in real-world data population in two medical institutions in Portugal
Presenter: Isabel Gomes Fernandes
Session: e-Poster Display Session
22P - Correlation of muscle strength and quality of life in Indonesian breast cancer patients who underwent chemotherapy
Presenter: Devina Halim
Session: e-Poster Display Session
23P - Oncotype DX RS correlation with clinicopathologic risk factors and chemotherapy: Follow up based on TAILORx study
Presenter: Faroug Ali
Session: e-Poster Display Session