Abstract 420TiP
Background
EGFR TKIs are established as an effective treatment for patients with EGFRm+ NSCLC harboring common mutations (Del19 or L858R). However, 7% to 23% of NSCLC tumors harbor uncommon EGFR mutations, where EGFR TKI efficacy is less established. Up to 75% of patients treated with afatinib develop T790M resistance. Second-line osimertinib is highly effective in these patients. In the GioTag study, sequential afatinib and osimertinib was associated with encouraging outcomes (median TTF and OS: 28.1 and 41.3 months, respectively) in 203 patients who developed T790M mutations after first-line therapy in a real-world setting.
Trial design
This real-world, non-interventional, global, multi-center study (UpSwinG; NCT04179890) will enroll ∼400 patients with EGFR TKI-naïve advanced (stage IIIB/IV) EGFRm+ NSCLC treated with EGFR TKIs across ∼65 study centers in ≤11 countries. Pre-existing data will be retrospectively collected from medical records (paper or electronic); selection bias will be minimized where possible, including by selecting only consecutive patients meeting each of the inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria. The study comprises two cohorts (∼200 patients each). Cohort 1 will include patients with tumors harboring uncommon or compound EGFR mutations who received first- or second-line EGFR TKI treatment. Cohort 2 will include patients with common EGFR mutations who progressed on first-line afatinib, tested positive for T790M and were subsequently treated with second-line osimertinib (40 or 80 mg/day). Key exclusion criteria include prior participation in other EGFRm+ NSCLC studies and patients with active brain metastases. Across both cohorts, the primary objective will be time on treatment, defined from the start of EGFR TKI treatment until the end of EGFR TKI treatment or death by any cause in cohort 1, and from the start of first-line until the end of second-line treatment or death by any cause in cohort 2. Secondary objectives include overall response rate, overall survival, and time on second-line treatment (in cohort 1). Thus far, 256 patients have been recruited: 206 in cohort 1, and 50 in cohort 2.
Clinical trial identification
NCT04179890.
Legal entity responsible for the study
Boehringer Ingelheim.
Funding
Boehringer Ingelheim.
Disclosure
S. Miura: Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: Chugai Pharma; Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: AstraZeneca; Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: MSD; Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: Lilly; Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: Boehringer Ingelheim; Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: Taiho Pharma; Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: Ono Pharma; Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: Bristol-Myers Squibb; Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: Novartis; Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: Abbvie; Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: Kyowa Hakko Kirin. A. Märten: Full/Part-time employment: Boehringer Ingelheim. S. Popat: Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy, Research grant/Funding (institution), Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: BMS; Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy, Research grant/Funding (institution), Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Roche; Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy, Research grant/Funding (institution): Takeda; Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy, Research grant/Funding (institution): AZ; Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy, Research grant/Funding (institution): Pfizer; Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy, Research grant/Funding (institution), Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: MSD; Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy: EMD Serono; Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy, Research grant/Funding (institution): Guardant Health; Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy: AbbVie; Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy, Research grant/Funding (institution): Boehringer Ingelheim; Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy: Incyte; Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy: Paradox; Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy, Research grant/Funding (institution): Lilly; Research grant/Funding (institution): Ariad.
Resources from the same session
134P - Effect of preoperative tumour under-staging on the long-term survival of patients undergoing radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer
Presenter: Mi Lin
Session: e-Poster Display Session
135P - Significance of lymphatic invasion in the indication for additional gastrectomy after endoscopic treatment
Presenter: Hirohito Fujikawa
Session: e-Poster Display Session
136P - Modified ypTNM staging classification for gastric cancer after neoadjuvant therapy: A multi-institutional study
Presenter: Wen-Wu Qiu
Session: e-Poster Display Session
137P - Clinical utility of circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) in resectable gastric cancer (GC)
Presenter: Mikhail Fedyanin
Session: e-Poster Display Session
138P - Prognostic importance of dynamic changes in systemic inflammatory markers for patients with gastric cancer
Presenter: Ying-Qi Huang
Session: e-Poster Display Session
139P - An intraoperative model for predicting survival and deciding therapeutic schedules: A comprehensive analysis of peritoneal metastasis in patients with advanced gastric cancer
Presenter: Zhi-Yu Liu
Session: e-Poster Display Session
140P - Preoperative and postoperative C-reactive protein levels predict recurrence and chemotherapy benefit in gastric cancer
Presenter: Li-Li Shen
Session: e-Poster Display Session
141P - Low expression of CDK5RAP3 and UFM1 indicates poor prognosis in patients with gastric cancer
Presenter: Ning-Zi Lian
Session: e-Poster Display Session
142P - Prognostic analysis of patients with intra-abdominal infectious complications after laparoscopy and open radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A propensity score-matching analysis
Presenter: Si-Jin Que
Session: e-Poster Display Session
143P - Lymph nodes metastasis is the most important factor associated with pattern of recurrence following curative resection of gastric adenocarcinoma
Presenter: Fu-Hai Wang
Session: e-Poster Display Session