Abstract 420TiP
Background
EGFR TKIs are established as an effective treatment for patients with EGFRm+ NSCLC harboring common mutations (Del19 or L858R). However, 7% to 23% of NSCLC tumors harbor uncommon EGFR mutations, where EGFR TKI efficacy is less established. Up to 75% of patients treated with afatinib develop T790M resistance. Second-line osimertinib is highly effective in these patients. In the GioTag study, sequential afatinib and osimertinib was associated with encouraging outcomes (median TTF and OS: 28.1 and 41.3 months, respectively) in 203 patients who developed T790M mutations after first-line therapy in a real-world setting.
Trial design
This real-world, non-interventional, global, multi-center study (UpSwinG; NCT04179890) will enroll ∼400 patients with EGFR TKI-naïve advanced (stage IIIB/IV) EGFRm+ NSCLC treated with EGFR TKIs across ∼65 study centers in ≤11 countries. Pre-existing data will be retrospectively collected from medical records (paper or electronic); selection bias will be minimized where possible, including by selecting only consecutive patients meeting each of the inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria. The study comprises two cohorts (∼200 patients each). Cohort 1 will include patients with tumors harboring uncommon or compound EGFR mutations who received first- or second-line EGFR TKI treatment. Cohort 2 will include patients with common EGFR mutations who progressed on first-line afatinib, tested positive for T790M and were subsequently treated with second-line osimertinib (40 or 80 mg/day). Key exclusion criteria include prior participation in other EGFRm+ NSCLC studies and patients with active brain metastases. Across both cohorts, the primary objective will be time on treatment, defined from the start of EGFR TKI treatment until the end of EGFR TKI treatment or death by any cause in cohort 1, and from the start of first-line until the end of second-line treatment or death by any cause in cohort 2. Secondary objectives include overall response rate, overall survival, and time on second-line treatment (in cohort 1). Thus far, 256 patients have been recruited: 206 in cohort 1, and 50 in cohort 2.
Clinical trial identification
NCT04179890.
Legal entity responsible for the study
Boehringer Ingelheim.
Funding
Boehringer Ingelheim.
Disclosure
S. Miura: Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: Chugai Pharma; Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: AstraZeneca; Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: MSD; Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: Lilly; Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: Boehringer Ingelheim; Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: Taiho Pharma; Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: Ono Pharma; Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: Bristol-Myers Squibb; Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: Novartis; Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: Abbvie; Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: Kyowa Hakko Kirin. A. Märten: Full/Part-time employment: Boehringer Ingelheim. S. Popat: Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy, Research grant/Funding (institution), Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: BMS; Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy, Research grant/Funding (institution), Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Roche; Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy, Research grant/Funding (institution): Takeda; Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy, Research grant/Funding (institution): AZ; Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy, Research grant/Funding (institution): Pfizer; Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy, Research grant/Funding (institution), Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: MSD; Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy: EMD Serono; Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy, Research grant/Funding (institution): Guardant Health; Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy: AbbVie; Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy, Research grant/Funding (institution): Boehringer Ingelheim; Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy: Incyte; Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy: Paradox; Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy, Research grant/Funding (institution): Lilly; Research grant/Funding (institution): Ariad.
Resources from the same session
144P - Clinical implication of DNA damage response gene in patients with stage II or III gastric cancer
Presenter: In Gyu Hwang
Session: e-Poster Display Session
145P - A nomogram for predicting the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy after resection in patients with Borrmann type IV gastric cancer
Presenter: Qing-Zhu Qiu
Session: e-Poster Display Session
146P - Red cell distribution width and mean corpuscular volume ratio as a promising new marker for chemotherapy effects in remnant gastric cancer: An analysis of a multi-institutional database
Presenter: Kai-Xiang Xu
Session: e-Poster Display Session
147P - Can the clinical stage of the 8th edition of the Union for International Cancer Control TNM classification stratify prognosis of patients with Siewert type II/III cancer?
Presenter: Hayato Watanabe
Session: e-Poster Display Session
148P - MCV-the ideal answer to predict the prognosis of remnant gastric cancer: An analysis from a multi-institutional database
Presenter: Kai Weng
Session: e-Poster Display Session
149P - Molecular and clinical characteristics of patients with resectable gastric cancer
Presenter: Zhi Zheng
Session: e-Poster Display Session
150P - Real-world assessment of the treatment patterns associated with unresectable advanced and metastatic gastric cancer in China
Presenter: Xiao Sun
Session: e-Poster Display Session
151P - Treatment patterns, healthcare resource use, economic and survival outcomes associated with unresectable advanced metastatic gastric cancers in Taiwan
Presenter: Chee Jen Chang
Session: e-Poster Display Session
152P - ARID1A deficiency in EBV-positive gastric cancer is partially regulated by EBV-encoded miRNAs, but not by DNA promotor hypermethylation
Presenter: Koji Kase
Session: e-Poster Display Session
153P - Mutational landscape of gastric cancer (GC) in adolescents and young adults (AYA) in Asia from 2015-2019
Presenter: Evelyn Yi Ting Wong
Session: e-Poster Display Session