Abstract 420TiP
Background
EGFR TKIs are established as an effective treatment for patients with EGFRm+ NSCLC harboring common mutations (Del19 or L858R). However, 7% to 23% of NSCLC tumors harbor uncommon EGFR mutations, where EGFR TKI efficacy is less established. Up to 75% of patients treated with afatinib develop T790M resistance. Second-line osimertinib is highly effective in these patients. In the GioTag study, sequential afatinib and osimertinib was associated with encouraging outcomes (median TTF and OS: 28.1 and 41.3 months, respectively) in 203 patients who developed T790M mutations after first-line therapy in a real-world setting.
Trial design
This real-world, non-interventional, global, multi-center study (UpSwinG; NCT04179890) will enroll ∼400 patients with EGFR TKI-naïve advanced (stage IIIB/IV) EGFRm+ NSCLC treated with EGFR TKIs across ∼65 study centers in ≤11 countries. Pre-existing data will be retrospectively collected from medical records (paper or electronic); selection bias will be minimized where possible, including by selecting only consecutive patients meeting each of the inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria. The study comprises two cohorts (∼200 patients each). Cohort 1 will include patients with tumors harboring uncommon or compound EGFR mutations who received first- or second-line EGFR TKI treatment. Cohort 2 will include patients with common EGFR mutations who progressed on first-line afatinib, tested positive for T790M and were subsequently treated with second-line osimertinib (40 or 80 mg/day). Key exclusion criteria include prior participation in other EGFRm+ NSCLC studies and patients with active brain metastases. Across both cohorts, the primary objective will be time on treatment, defined from the start of EGFR TKI treatment until the end of EGFR TKI treatment or death by any cause in cohort 1, and from the start of first-line until the end of second-line treatment or death by any cause in cohort 2. Secondary objectives include overall response rate, overall survival, and time on second-line treatment (in cohort 1). Thus far, 256 patients have been recruited: 206 in cohort 1, and 50 in cohort 2.
Clinical trial identification
NCT04179890.
Legal entity responsible for the study
Boehringer Ingelheim.
Funding
Boehringer Ingelheim.
Disclosure
S. Miura: Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: Chugai Pharma; Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: AstraZeneca; Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: MSD; Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: Lilly; Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: Boehringer Ingelheim; Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: Taiho Pharma; Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: Ono Pharma; Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: Bristol-Myers Squibb; Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: Novartis; Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: Abbvie; Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: Kyowa Hakko Kirin. A. Märten: Full/Part-time employment: Boehringer Ingelheim. S. Popat: Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy, Research grant/Funding (institution), Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: BMS; Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy, Research grant/Funding (institution), Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Roche; Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy, Research grant/Funding (institution): Takeda; Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy, Research grant/Funding (institution): AZ; Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy, Research grant/Funding (institution): Pfizer; Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy, Research grant/Funding (institution), Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: MSD; Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy: EMD Serono; Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy, Research grant/Funding (institution): Guardant Health; Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy: AbbVie; Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy, Research grant/Funding (institution): Boehringer Ingelheim; Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy: Incyte; Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy: Paradox; Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy, Research grant/Funding (institution): Lilly; Research grant/Funding (institution): Ariad.
Resources from the same session
124P - Prospective evaluation of pattern of care and quality of life in patients undergoing esophagectomy at a high-volume regional cancer centre in South India
Presenter: Faheem Abdulla
Session: e-Poster Display Session
125P - Analysis of esophageal cancer incidence for last 20 years in Uzbekistan
Presenter: Abrorjon Yusupbekov
Session: e-Poster Display Session
126P - A phase II study of rh-endostatin combined with irinotecan plus cisplatin as the second-line treatment for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC)
Presenter: Jianhua Chang
Session: e-Poster Display Session
128P - Clinical update with plasma and tumour-based genomic analyses in expansion part of phase I study of selective FGFR inhibitor E7090
Presenter: Chigusa Morizane
Session: e-Poster Display Session
129P - Exploration of the best candidates for splenic hilar lymph node dissection (No.10 LND) based on long-term survival: Stage IIIA proximal gastric cancer may benefit from No.10 LND
Presenter: Zu-Kai Wang
Session: e-Poster Display Session
130P - Reappraisal of the role of no. 10 lymphadenectomy for proximal gastric cancer in the era of minimal invasive surgery during total gastrectomy: A pooled analysis of 4 prospective trials
Presenter: Qing Zhong
Session: e-Poster Display Session
131P - Prognostic value of tumour regression grading (TRG) in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus surgery for gastric cancer
Presenter: Jian-Wei Xie
Session: e-Poster Display Session
132P - Impact of increasing age on cancer- and noncancer-specific mortality in patients with gastric cancer treated by radical surgery: A competing risk analysis
Presenter: Long-Long Cao
Session: e-Poster Display Session
133P - Which patient subgroup needs more attention in early treatment failure? A matched cohort study of treatment failure patterns in locally advanced gastric cancer
Presenter: Dong Wu
Session: e-Poster Display Session