Abstract 357P
Background
Programmed cell death/programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) inhibitors have preliminarily shown encouraging results as neoadjuvant setting. No data reported on randomized trials comparing neoadjuvant immunotherapy and chemotherapy leaving undetermined critical issues for better clinical treatment options.
Methods
We conducted a systemic review of trials involving neoadjuvant immunotherapy and chemotherapy, performing an indirect comparison meta-analysis of neoadjuvant immunotherapy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy upon multiple short-term outcome.
Results
This systematic review and meta-analysis included 10 trials of neoadjuvant immunotherapy and 11 neoadjuvant chemotherapy involving 1755 patients. Patients received PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors alone (13.3%; 95%CI, 9.0%-19.3%) had lower objective response rate (ORR) compared to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy (62.5%; 95%CI, 54.4%-70.0%) or chemotherapy (41.6%; 95%CI, 36.8%-46.7%) while neoadjuvant PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy (36.2%; 95%CI, 19.2%-57.6%) achieved elevated complete pathological complete response (pCR) eclipsing PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors alone (10.6%; 95%CI, 6.5%-16.9%) and standard chemotherapy (7.5%; 95%CI, 5.7%-9.8%). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (87.2%; 95%CI, 74.9%-94.0%) has numerically lower R0 resection rate in contrast to neoadjuvant PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors alone (92.7%; 95%CI, 83.4%-97.0%) and PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy (91.6%; 95%CI, 84.3%-95.7%). Subgroup analysis showed that increased proportion of stage III patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (p=0.025, Spearman r=0.761) may be correlated with lower R0 resection rate while no significant correlation was found in PD-1/PD-L1-based neoadjuvant treatment.
Conclusions
Compared to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, immunotherapy-based regimens provided superior pathological response along with higher complete resection rate especially for stage III disease. Immunotherapy combined chemotherapy as neoadjuvant setting may be a more preferable clinical option currently.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Wen-zhao Zhong.
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
34P - Clinical significance of neoadjuvant dose-dense chemotherapy for II and III stage breast cancer: A meta-analysis of published studies
Presenter: Meng chen Liu
Session: e-Poster Display Session
35P - Pathological response to weekly nabpaclitaxel and carboplatin followed by anthracycline regimen in triple negative breast cancer
Presenter: Goteti Sharat Chandra
Session: e-Poster Display Session
36P - Survival in patients with contralateral breast cancer
Presenter: Sergey Kamishov
Session: e-Poster Display Session
37P - Correlation between haematological toxicity with quality of life in breast cancer patients after first-cycle chemotherapy
Presenter: felix Wijovi
Session: e-Poster Display Session
38P - Evaluation of the prognostic value of innate immunity-related biomarkers in early breast cancer (BC)
Presenter: Veronica Martini
Session: e-Poster Display Session
39P - CSF-1R inhibitor (C019199) enhances antitumor effect in combination with anti-PD-1 therapy on murine breast cancer models
Presenter: Jiani Zheng
Session: e-Poster Display Session
40P - Molecular subtypes and imaging phenotypes of breast cancer: MRI
Presenter: Yulduz Khatamovna
Session: e-Poster Display Session
41P - Mir-223 overexpression is associated with increased expression of EGFR and worse prognosis in Indonesian TNBC patients
Presenter: Ibnu Purwanto
Session: e-Poster Display Session
42P - Impact of germline mutations on breast cancer prognosis in Kazakh population
Presenter: Dilyara Kaidarova
Session: e-Poster Display Session
50P - Efficacy and safety analysis of pyrotinib in lapatinib resistant HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: A retrospective study
Presenter: Yijia Hua
Session: e-Poster Display Session