Abstract 357P
Background
Programmed cell death/programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) inhibitors have preliminarily shown encouraging results as neoadjuvant setting. No data reported on randomized trials comparing neoadjuvant immunotherapy and chemotherapy leaving undetermined critical issues for better clinical treatment options.
Methods
We conducted a systemic review of trials involving neoadjuvant immunotherapy and chemotherapy, performing an indirect comparison meta-analysis of neoadjuvant immunotherapy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy upon multiple short-term outcome.
Results
This systematic review and meta-analysis included 10 trials of neoadjuvant immunotherapy and 11 neoadjuvant chemotherapy involving 1755 patients. Patients received PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors alone (13.3%; 95%CI, 9.0%-19.3%) had lower objective response rate (ORR) compared to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy (62.5%; 95%CI, 54.4%-70.0%) or chemotherapy (41.6%; 95%CI, 36.8%-46.7%) while neoadjuvant PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy (36.2%; 95%CI, 19.2%-57.6%) achieved elevated complete pathological complete response (pCR) eclipsing PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors alone (10.6%; 95%CI, 6.5%-16.9%) and standard chemotherapy (7.5%; 95%CI, 5.7%-9.8%). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (87.2%; 95%CI, 74.9%-94.0%) has numerically lower R0 resection rate in contrast to neoadjuvant PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors alone (92.7%; 95%CI, 83.4%-97.0%) and PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy (91.6%; 95%CI, 84.3%-95.7%). Subgroup analysis showed that increased proportion of stage III patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (p=0.025, Spearman r=0.761) may be correlated with lower R0 resection rate while no significant correlation was found in PD-1/PD-L1-based neoadjuvant treatment.
Conclusions
Compared to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, immunotherapy-based regimens provided superior pathological response along with higher complete resection rate especially for stage III disease. Immunotherapy combined chemotherapy as neoadjuvant setting may be a more preferable clinical option currently.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Wen-zhao Zhong.
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
94P - Prognostic influence of mean platelet volume on stage III rectal cancer patients: A tertiary cancer center study
Presenter: Pavan Jonnada
Session: e-Poster Display Session
95P - Prognosis of Japanese patients with detailed RAS/BRAF mutant colorectal cancer
Presenter: Tatsuki Ikoma
Session: e-Poster Display Session
96P - Early-onset colorectal cancer prognosis, conflict resolution, review of literature and meta-analysis
Presenter: Ereny Poles
Session: e-Poster Display Session
97P - A population-based study to assess the associations of rural residence and low socioeconomic status (SES) with cardiovascular disease (CVD) in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC)
Presenter: Atul Batra
Session: e-Poster Display Session
98P - Operational challenges of an Asian Pacific (APAC) academic oncology clinical trial
Presenter: Daphne Day
Session: e-Poster Display Session
99P - Development of a qRT-PCR-based diagnostic test to identify colorectal cancer patients with recurrent R-Spondin gene fusions
Presenter: Veronica Diermayr
Session: e-Poster Display Session
100P - Individualized treatment of advanced digestive system tumour guided by PDTX mouse model: A multicenter trial
Presenter: yuan cheng
Session: e-Poster Display Session
101P - HIF1-α depletion overcomes resistance to oxaliplatin in colorectal cancer via ERK signalling pathway
Presenter: Se Jun Park
Session: e-Poster Display Session
102P - Colorectal cancer organoids culture exploits new neoadjuvant therapy resistance mechanisms and therapeutic targets
Presenter: Yun Deng
Session: e-Poster Display Session
103P - Comprehensive genomic landscape in younger and older Chinese patients with colorectal cancer
Presenter: Huina Wang
Session: e-Poster Display Session