Abstract 357P
Background
Programmed cell death/programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) inhibitors have preliminarily shown encouraging results as neoadjuvant setting. No data reported on randomized trials comparing neoadjuvant immunotherapy and chemotherapy leaving undetermined critical issues for better clinical treatment options.
Methods
We conducted a systemic review of trials involving neoadjuvant immunotherapy and chemotherapy, performing an indirect comparison meta-analysis of neoadjuvant immunotherapy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy upon multiple short-term outcome.
Results
This systematic review and meta-analysis included 10 trials of neoadjuvant immunotherapy and 11 neoadjuvant chemotherapy involving 1755 patients. Patients received PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors alone (13.3%; 95%CI, 9.0%-19.3%) had lower objective response rate (ORR) compared to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy (62.5%; 95%CI, 54.4%-70.0%) or chemotherapy (41.6%; 95%CI, 36.8%-46.7%) while neoadjuvant PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy (36.2%; 95%CI, 19.2%-57.6%) achieved elevated complete pathological complete response (pCR) eclipsing PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors alone (10.6%; 95%CI, 6.5%-16.9%) and standard chemotherapy (7.5%; 95%CI, 5.7%-9.8%). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (87.2%; 95%CI, 74.9%-94.0%) has numerically lower R0 resection rate in contrast to neoadjuvant PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors alone (92.7%; 95%CI, 83.4%-97.0%) and PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy (91.6%; 95%CI, 84.3%-95.7%). Subgroup analysis showed that increased proportion of stage III patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (p=0.025, Spearman r=0.761) may be correlated with lower R0 resection rate while no significant correlation was found in PD-1/PD-L1-based neoadjuvant treatment.
Conclusions
Compared to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, immunotherapy-based regimens provided superior pathological response along with higher complete resection rate especially for stage III disease. Immunotherapy combined chemotherapy as neoadjuvant setting may be a more preferable clinical option currently.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Wen-zhao Zhong.
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
61P - Clinical implication of BRCA mutation in breast cancer with central nervous system metastasis
Presenter: Jwa Hoon Kim
Session: e-Poster Display Session
62P - IGF axis in breast cancer recurrence and metastasis
Presenter: Hajara Akhter
Session: e-Poster Display Session
63P - Butterfly pea (<italic>Clitoria ternatea</italic> Linn.) flower extract prevents MCF-7 HER2-positive breast cancer cell metastasis in-vitro
Presenter: Azzahra Asysyifa
Session: e-Poster Display Session
64P - Pre-treatment absolute white blood cell profile count as metastatic predictive factors in invasive ductal carcinoma breast cancer
Presenter: Wikania I Gede
Session: e-Poster Display Session
65P - The new mouse anti-nNav1.5 monoclonal antibody
Presenter: Nur Aishah Sharudin
Session: e-Poster Display Session
66P - The TILs near solid structures is a potential prognostic factor of distant metastases in the luminal HER2-negative breast cancer
Presenter: Vladimir Alifanov
Session: e-Poster Display Session
73P - Selinexor in combination with carboplatin and pemetrexed (CP) in patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors: Results of an open label, single-center, multi-arm phase Ib study
Presenter: Kyaw Thein
Session: e-Poster Display Session
74P - Comprehensive transcriptome analysis of endoplasmic reticulum stress in osteosarcomas
Presenter: Yoshiyuki Suehara
Session: e-Poster Display Session
75P - The evaluation of selective sensitivity of EZH2 inhibitors based on synthetic lethality in ARID1A-deficient gastric cancer
Presenter: Leo Yamada
Session: e-Poster Display Session
76P - Targeted tumour photoImmunotherapy against triple-negative breast cancer therapy
Presenter: Vivek Raju
Session: e-Poster Display Session