Abstract 357P
Background
Programmed cell death/programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) inhibitors have preliminarily shown encouraging results as neoadjuvant setting. No data reported on randomized trials comparing neoadjuvant immunotherapy and chemotherapy leaving undetermined critical issues for better clinical treatment options.
Methods
We conducted a systemic review of trials involving neoadjuvant immunotherapy and chemotherapy, performing an indirect comparison meta-analysis of neoadjuvant immunotherapy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy upon multiple short-term outcome.
Results
This systematic review and meta-analysis included 10 trials of neoadjuvant immunotherapy and 11 neoadjuvant chemotherapy involving 1755 patients. Patients received PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors alone (13.3%; 95%CI, 9.0%-19.3%) had lower objective response rate (ORR) compared to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy (62.5%; 95%CI, 54.4%-70.0%) or chemotherapy (41.6%; 95%CI, 36.8%-46.7%) while neoadjuvant PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy (36.2%; 95%CI, 19.2%-57.6%) achieved elevated complete pathological complete response (pCR) eclipsing PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors alone (10.6%; 95%CI, 6.5%-16.9%) and standard chemotherapy (7.5%; 95%CI, 5.7%-9.8%). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (87.2%; 95%CI, 74.9%-94.0%) has numerically lower R0 resection rate in contrast to neoadjuvant PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors alone (92.7%; 95%CI, 83.4%-97.0%) and PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy (91.6%; 95%CI, 84.3%-95.7%). Subgroup analysis showed that increased proportion of stage III patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (p=0.025, Spearman r=0.761) may be correlated with lower R0 resection rate while no significant correlation was found in PD-1/PD-L1-based neoadjuvant treatment.
Conclusions
Compared to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, immunotherapy-based regimens provided superior pathological response along with higher complete resection rate especially for stage III disease. Immunotherapy combined chemotherapy as neoadjuvant setting may be a more preferable clinical option currently.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Wen-zhao Zhong.
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
24P - The Pink Vans: Bringing cancer screening closer to home
Presenter: Frederic Ivan Ting
Session: e-Poster Display Session
25P - Identification of gene mutations in patients with breast cancer in a region located in the southeast of the European part of Russia
Presenter: Alexander Sultanbaev
Session: e-Poster Display Session
26P - Body mass index and clinical outcomes in Egyptian women with breast cancer: A multi-institutional study
Presenter: Amrou Mamdouh Abdeen Shaaban
Session: e-Poster Display Session
27P - Breast cancer primary site and laterality as predictive factors of prognosis: SEER based analysis for survival
Presenter: Eman Zin Eldin
Session: e-Poster Display Session
28P - Breast cancer care services at Nilai Medical Centre: A Malaysian experience
Presenter: Ratnavelu Kananathan
Session: e-Poster Display Session
29P - Factors affecting breast self-examination (BSE) behaviour among female high school students in Denpasar City, Bali
Presenter: Cindy Trisina
Session: e-Poster Display Session
30P - Male breast cancer: A rural based peripheral cancer center experience
Presenter: SACHIN KHANDELWAL
Session: e-Poster Display Session
31P - The prognostic value of pre-treatment peripheral neutrophil-lymphocyte-ratio (NLR) and its correlation with mutant p53 expression in Indonesian triple negative breast cancer patients
Presenter: Rosita Purwanto
Session: e-Poster Display Session
32P - Clinicopathologic features and prognostic factors in male breast cancer: A single centre experience
Presenter: Izzet Dogan
Session: e-Poster Display Session
33P - FDG-PET predictivity of pathological axillary nodal status in carcinoma breast-upfront and post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) setting
Presenter: Krithikaa Sekar
Session: e-Poster Display Session