Abstract 144P
Background
Paclitaxel is commonly used as second-line therapy in advanced gastric cancer (AGC). The decision to proceed with second-line chemotherapy and select a chemotherapy regimen may be critical in vulnerable AGC patients after progression with first-line chemotherapy. However, there are no predictive biomarkers to identify patients with AGC who benefit from paclitaxel-based chemotherapy.
Methods
This study included 288 patients with AGC receiving second-line paclitaxel-based chemotherapy between 2017 and 2022 from K-MASTER project, a nationwide, government-funded precision medicine initiative. The data included clinicogenomic factors: clinical (age [young-onset vs. others], sex, histology [intestinal vs. diffuse type], prior trastuzumab use, duration of first-line chemotherapy, etc.) and genomic factors (pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants). The data were randomly divided into training and test sets (0.8:0.2). Three machine-learning methods, including random forest (RF), logistic regression (LR), and artificial neural network with genetic embedding (ANN) models, were used to develop the prediction model and were validated in the test sets.
Results
The median age was 64 years (range, 25-91) and 65.6% were male. A total of 288 patients were divided into training (n=230) and test sets (n=58). There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between training and test sets. In the training set, the AUC for prediction of progression-free survival (PFS) with paclitaxel-based chemotherapy was 0.51, 0.73, and 0.75 in RF, LR, and ANN models, respectively. In the test set, the Kaplan-Meier curves of PFS were separated according to the three models: 2.8 vs. 1.5 months (P=0.07) in RF, 2.3 vs. 6.5 months (P=0.07) in LR, and 2.1 vs. 7.6 months (P=0.02) in ANN models.
Conclusions
These machine-learning models integrated clinical and genomic factors and can guide the selection of patients with AGC with a greater likelihood of a benefit from second-line paclitaxel-based chemotherapy. Further studies are necessary to validate and update these models in independent datasets in future.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
602P - COLUMBUS 7-year update: A randomized, open-label, phase III trial of encorafenib (Enco) + binimetinib (Bini) vs vemurafenib (Vemu) or Enco in patients (Pts) with BRAF V600-mutant melanoma
Presenter: Andrew Haydon
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
603P - An individualised postoperative radiological surveillance schedule for IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients (HK-GBM Registry)
Presenter: Jason Chak Yan Li
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
604P - Cabozantinib versus placebo in patients with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer who progressed after prior VEGFR-targeted therapy: Outcomes from COSMIC-311 by BRAF status
Presenter: Marcia Brose
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
606P - BRAF and NRAS mutations are associated with poor prognosis in Asians with acral-lentiginous and nodular cutaneous melanoma
Presenter: Sumadi Lukman Anwar
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
607P - Single institutional outcomes of radiotherapy and systemic therapy for melanoma brain metastases in Japan
Presenter: Naoya Yamazaki
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
608P - The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy in mucosal melanomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Andrea Teo
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
609P - The association between thyroid function abnormalities and vitiligo induced by pembrolizumab regarding prognosis in patients with advanced melanoma
Presenter: Moez Mobarek
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
610P - Analyzing the clinical benefit of the evidence presented at these congresses and utilizing a standardized scale to quantify it will significantly enhance our understanding of the studies showcased, allowing for more objective evaluation and interpretation
Presenter: Charles Jeffrey Tan
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
611P - ESMO-magnitude of clinical benefit scale (MCBS) scores for phase III trials of adjuvant and curative therapies at the 2022 ASCO annual meeting (ASCO22)
Presenter: Thi Thao Vi Luong
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
612P - Is the juice worth the squeeze? Overall survival gain per unit treatment time as a metric of clinical benefit of systemic treatment in incurable cancers
Presenter: Vodathi Bamunuarachchi
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract