Abstract 144P
Background
Paclitaxel is commonly used as second-line therapy in advanced gastric cancer (AGC). The decision to proceed with second-line chemotherapy and select a chemotherapy regimen may be critical in vulnerable AGC patients after progression with first-line chemotherapy. However, there are no predictive biomarkers to identify patients with AGC who benefit from paclitaxel-based chemotherapy.
Methods
This study included 288 patients with AGC receiving second-line paclitaxel-based chemotherapy between 2017 and 2022 from K-MASTER project, a nationwide, government-funded precision medicine initiative. The data included clinicogenomic factors: clinical (age [young-onset vs. others], sex, histology [intestinal vs. diffuse type], prior trastuzumab use, duration of first-line chemotherapy, etc.) and genomic factors (pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants). The data were randomly divided into training and test sets (0.8:0.2). Three machine-learning methods, including random forest (RF), logistic regression (LR), and artificial neural network with genetic embedding (ANN) models, were used to develop the prediction model and were validated in the test sets.
Results
The median age was 64 years (range, 25-91) and 65.6% were male. A total of 288 patients were divided into training (n=230) and test sets (n=58). There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between training and test sets. In the training set, the AUC for prediction of progression-free survival (PFS) with paclitaxel-based chemotherapy was 0.51, 0.73, and 0.75 in RF, LR, and ANN models, respectively. In the test set, the Kaplan-Meier curves of PFS were separated according to the three models: 2.8 vs. 1.5 months (P=0.07) in RF, 2.3 vs. 6.5 months (P=0.07) in LR, and 2.1 vs. 7.6 months (P=0.02) in ANN models.
Conclusions
These machine-learning models integrated clinical and genomic factors and can guide the selection of patients with AGC with a greater likelihood of a benefit from second-line paclitaxel-based chemotherapy. Further studies are necessary to validate and update these models in independent datasets in future.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
623P - Advances in methylation analysis of liquid biopsy in early cancer detection of colorectal and lung cancer
Presenter: Sam Martin
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
624P - Pan-cancer single-cell isoform atlas: Unraveling isoform dynamics in cancer immunotherapy
Presenter: Lu Pan
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
625P - The association of tumor marker concentration and air pollution in cancer survivors and the general population
Presenter: Kyae Hyung Kim
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
626P - Percentage of cancer patients undergoing adjusted targeted therapy after ctDNA testing: Insights from a tertiary hospital experience
Presenter: Jisook Yim
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
627P - Racial disparities in synchronous and metachronous colorectal and prostate cancer: SEER based study 2000-2020
Presenter: Taha Nagib
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract