Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster display session

494P - Comparison of pattern of disease progression and prevalence of acquired T790M mutation in Malaysia patients with EGFR mutant lung adenocarcinoma upon failure of first-line afatinib, gefitinib and erlotinib

Date

23 Nov 2019

Session

Poster display session

Topics

Tumour Site

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Presenters

Chee Shee Chai

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2019) 30 (suppl_9): ix157-ix181. 10.1093/annonc/mdz437

Authors

C.S. Chai1, O. Po Lin2, C.K. Liam3, Y.K. Pang4, G.F. Ho5, A. Alip6, C.K. Wong7, M.E. Poh7, J.L. Tan7

Author affiliations

  • 1 Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, University Malaysia Sarawak, 94300 - Kota Samarahan/MY
  • 2 Clinical Oncology Department, UMMC - University Malaya Medical Centre, 59100 - Kuala Lumpur/MY
  • 3 Medical, University Malaya Medical Centre (UMMC), 59100 - Kuala Lumpur/MY
  • 4 Medicine, University Malaya Medical Center, 59100 - Kuala Lumpur/MY
  • 5 Dept Of Clinical Oncology, University Malaya Medical Center, 59100 - Kuala Lumpur/MY
  • 6 Clinical Oncology, University of Malaya Faculty of Medicine, 50603 - Kuala Lumpur/MY
  • 7 Medicine, University Malaya Medical Centre (UMMC), 59100 - Kuala Lumpur/MY

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 494P

Background

Patients receiving first-line afatinib, gefitinib or erlotinib for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutant advanced non-small cell lung cancer develop progression of disease (PD) after an average of 9-13 months.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of PD pattern and prevalence of acquired T790M mutation among patients failing first-line afatinib versus gefitinib or erlotinib at University Malaya Medical Centre from 1st January 2015 to 31th December 2018.

Results

Of 87 patients who developed PD while on first-line EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment, 19 (21.8%) were on afatinib, 49 (56.3%) were on gefitinib, and 19 (21.8%) were on erlotinib. The median progression-free survival (mPFS) of these patients is as shown in the table. Of 20 patients (23.0%) who developed new symptomatic brain metastases, one (5.0%) had new leptomeningeal metastases, three (15.0%) had both new leptomeningeal metastases and solid brain metastases, and the remaining 16 (80.0%) had new solid brain metastases only. New leptomeningeal metastases occurred in one patient treated with afatinib and three patients treated with gefitinib. Forty-nine patients (56.3%) were investigated for acquired T790M mutation either by plasma biopsy or tissue biopsy or both. The prevalence of acquired T790M mutation was 61.2%. There was no difference in the pattern of PD or prevalence of acquired T790M mutation among patients treated with afatinib, gefitinib or erlotinib.

Table: 494P

Pattern of PDPatients with PD (n = 87)Afatinib (n = 19)Gefitinib (n = 49)Erlotinib (n = 19)p-value
Median PFS, months11.013.110.97.80.479
New brain metastases, No. (%)Yes No20 (23.0) 67 (77.0)5 (26.3) 14 (73.7)12 (24.5) 37 (75.5)3 (15.8) 16 (84.2)0.692
New solid brain lesion metastases, No (%)Yes No19 (21.8) 68 (78.2)4 (21.1) 15 (78.9)12 (24.5) 37 (75.5)3 (15.5) 16 (84.2)0.735
New leptomeningeal metastases, No. (%)Yes No4 (4.6) 83 (95.4)1 (5.2) 18 (94.8)3 (6.1) 46 (93.9)0 19 (100)0.550
No. of patients tested for acquired T790M mutationn = 49n = 14n = 27n = 8p-value
Acquired T790M mutation detected, No. (%)Yes No30 (61.2) 19 (38.8)9 (64.3) 5 (35.7)16 (59.3) 11(40.7)5 (62.5) 3 (37.5)0.949

Conclusions

New leptomeningeal metastases were uncommon in patients receiving first-line EGFR-TKI. The choice of first-line first- or second generation EGFR-TKI did not influence the pattern of PD and prevalence of acquired T790M mutation. However, patients receiving afatinib appeared to have longer mPFS than those on gefitinib or erlotinib.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.