Abstract 206P
Background
To compare discriminant ability of risk stratifications for prostate cancer in three authoritative guidelines: National Comprehensive Cancer Network clinical practice guideline (NCCN-g), American Urological Association / American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology/ Society of Urologic Oncology Guideline(AUA-g) and European Association of Urology- European association of nuclear medicine- European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology- European Society of Urogenital Radiology- International Society of Geriatric Oncology guideline(EAU-g).
Methods
511916 patients with one primary prostate cancer diagnosed between 2004 and 2016 were identified using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER, submitted in) database of the National Cancer Institute. Patients were excluded from analysis if < 18 years of age, not adenocarcinoma, diagnosed at autopsy or death certificate only, with an unknown follow-up, incomplete clinical and demographic information, leaving 287333 patients in this cohort. Patients were categorized as different risk stratifications by three latest guidelines (NCCN-g, AUA-g and EAU-g) respectively. Follow-up endpoint was prostate cancer specific mortality (PCSM), cutoff date was December 31, 2016. Kaplan–Meier analysis, multivariable Cox regression and area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve (AUC) analyses were performed.
Results
The 287333 patients are all from 2004 to 2015. Median follow-up was 69 months (IQR: 39-104). For the three risk stratification modalities, all 6 risk groups in NCCN-g, 5 risk groups in AUA-g and 5 risk groups in EAU-g independently predicted PCSM. NCCN-g yielded 3.1-fold HR differences between low risk group and intermediate risk group, 14.8-fold HR differences between low risk group and high risk group, 33.0-fold HR differences between low risk group and very high risk group, 56.2-fold HR differences between low risk group and regional group, and 148.9-fold HR differences between low risk group and metastatic group. AUC is 0.8332, 0.8309 and 0.7868 in NCCN-g, AUA-g and EAU-g.
Conclusions
This large population-based analysis confirms the better discriminant properties of the risk stratification method in NCCN guideline.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Peking University First Hospital radiation oncology department.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
The author has declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
15P - Comparing the outcomes of the mastectomy using the tumescent technique by between the special and non-special surgeons
Presenter: Naoya Takeda
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
16P - Risk factors and prognostic value of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) in hormone positive, non-metastatic breast cancer receiving adjuvant hormonal therapy
Presenter: Kartika Taroeno Hariadi
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
17P - Distance related outcome in indigenous and non-indigenous breast cancer women of Western Australia
Presenter: Azim Khan
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
18P - Usefulness of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio in early stage breast cancer as predictor of disease-free survival in a Babylon Oncology Center
Presenter: Yaala Raof Al-Bairmany
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
19P - Silymarin functionalized quantum cores as selective inhibitor of polo-like kinase 1, and preclinical antitumor activity in human breast cancer xenografts
Presenter: Manickam Paulpandi
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
20P - Diagnostic value of serum HER-2 level in compression with tissue HER-2 in breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Amir Shamshirian
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
21P - Clinical outcome of treatment without trastuzumab in HER2 positive breast cancer patients
Presenter: Than Than Aye
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
22P - Clinical outcomes after skin-sparing or nipple areolar complex-sparing mastectomy with sentinel lymph node biopsy in early breast cancer patients
Presenter: Hye Yoon Lee
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
23P - The correlations between knowledge and attitudes of productive age women toward “SADARI” (breast self-assessment) as early detection of breast cancer in Pejeng Kaja Village, Ubud, Bali
Presenter: Yorky Brahmantya
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
24TiP - KEYNOTE-756: A randomized, double-blind, phase III study of pembrolizumab or placebo with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and adjuvant endocrine therapy for high-risk, early-stage, ER+/HER2−breast cancer
Presenter: Fatima Cardoso
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract