Abstract 206P
Background
To compare discriminant ability of risk stratifications for prostate cancer in three authoritative guidelines: National Comprehensive Cancer Network clinical practice guideline (NCCN-g), American Urological Association / American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology/ Society of Urologic Oncology Guideline(AUA-g) and European Association of Urology- European association of nuclear medicine- European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology- European Society of Urogenital Radiology- International Society of Geriatric Oncology guideline(EAU-g).
Methods
511916 patients with one primary prostate cancer diagnosed between 2004 and 2016 were identified using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER, submitted in) database of the National Cancer Institute. Patients were excluded from analysis if < 18 years of age, not adenocarcinoma, diagnosed at autopsy or death certificate only, with an unknown follow-up, incomplete clinical and demographic information, leaving 287333 patients in this cohort. Patients were categorized as different risk stratifications by three latest guidelines (NCCN-g, AUA-g and EAU-g) respectively. Follow-up endpoint was prostate cancer specific mortality (PCSM), cutoff date was December 31, 2016. Kaplan–Meier analysis, multivariable Cox regression and area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve (AUC) analyses were performed.
Results
The 287333 patients are all from 2004 to 2015. Median follow-up was 69 months (IQR: 39-104). For the three risk stratification modalities, all 6 risk groups in NCCN-g, 5 risk groups in AUA-g and 5 risk groups in EAU-g independently predicted PCSM. NCCN-g yielded 3.1-fold HR differences between low risk group and intermediate risk group, 14.8-fold HR differences between low risk group and high risk group, 33.0-fold HR differences between low risk group and very high risk group, 56.2-fold HR differences between low risk group and regional group, and 148.9-fold HR differences between low risk group and metastatic group. AUC is 0.8332, 0.8309 and 0.7868 in NCCN-g, AUA-g and EAU-g.
Conclusions
This large population-based analysis confirms the better discriminant properties of the risk stratification method in NCCN guideline.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Peking University First Hospital radiation oncology department.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
The author has declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
51P - Enhancing the anti-breast tumour activity of STING through a novel sting transcriptional regulator
Presenter: Hanchu Xiong
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
52P - Reverse Warburg effect-related mitochondrial activity and 18F-FDG uptake in invasive ductal carcinoma
Presenter: Byung Wook Choi
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
53P - Phase II study of atorvastatin in combination with radiotherapy and temozolomide in patients with glioblastoma (ART): Final analysis report
Presenter: Abdullah Altwairgi
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
54P - Association between Parkinson’s disease and brain tumours: A nationwide population-based cohort study
Presenter: Joo-hyun Park
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
55P - Toxicity profiles of treatment with modern fractionated radiotherapy, contemporary stereotactic radiosurgery, or transsphenoidal surgery in non-functioning pituitary macroadenoma
Presenter: Kevin Sheng-Po Yuan
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
56P - Hippocampal avoidance in WBRT for metastases: Comparative neurocognitive and dosimetric assessment
Presenter: Vibhay Pareek
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
57P - Multidisciplinary brain metastasis clinic: Is it effective and worthwhile?
Presenter: Annu Rajpurohit
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
58P - Functional status as a determinant prognostic factor for overall survival in adult patients with medulloblastoma treated with chemotherapy and radiotherapy
Presenter: Juan Ayala Alvarez
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
59P - Pattern of care in high-grade gliomas after recurrence
Presenter: Nandini Menon
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
60P - Five fractions plus “SRS” boost combined with temozolamide for newly diagnosed and recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (GBM)
Presenter: Azhar Rashid
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract