Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display

108P - Real-world (RW) effectiveness and safety of adjuvant nivolumab (NIVO) in patients (pts) with melanoma in Belgium and Luxembourg: PRESERV MEL

Date

07 Dec 2023

Session

Poster Display

Presenters

Bart Neyns

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2023) 20 (suppl_1): 100535-100535. 10.1016/iotech/iotech100535

Authors

B. Neyns1, L. Willemot2, L. McDonald3, H. Van Campenhout2, G. Berchem4, C. Jacobs5, A. Rogiers6, N. Blockx7, A. Rorive8

Author affiliations

  • 1 Vrije Universiteit Brussel - Faculty of Medicine & Pharmacy, Brussels/BE
  • 2 Bristol Myers Squibb, Braine L’Alleud/BE
  • 3 Bristol Myers Squibb, Uxbridge/GB
  • 4 Centre Hospitalier de Luxembourg and University of Luxembourg, Luxembourg/LU
  • 5 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent, Gent/BE
  • 6 Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Brugmann, Jette/BE
  • 7 Ziekenhuis Netwerk Antwerpen Middelheim, 2020 - Antwerpen/BE
  • 8 Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège Sart-Tilman, 4000 - Liège/BE

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 108P

Background

Adjuvant NIVO is approved for pts with melanoma with lymph node involvement/metastatic disease who have undergone complete resection. PRESERV MEL is an observational study aiming to describe effectiveness, safety, and quality of life in pts treated with adjuvant NIVO in the RW. Updated results are shown.

Methods

Pts were enrolled prospectively/retrospectively over a 2-y period and are being followed for 5 y. Index date was first NIVO administration. Pts received NIVO for ≤ 12 mo per label. Recurrence-free survival (RFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS; including baseline stage IV pts), time to discontinuation (TTD), subsequent treatment (tx), and adverse events (AEs)/tx-related AEs (TRAEs) were assessed.

Results

In total, 152 pts (125 prospective; 27 retrospective) were enrolled (Jan 2019–Dec 2020) at 15 sites in Belgium and Luxembourg. Median follow-up was 25 mo. Median TTD was 11.1 mo. All pts ended tx due to tx completion (56%), AE (23%), recurrence (15%), pt decision unrelated to AE (1%), or other reason (5%). Median RFS was 47.2 mo, 2-y RFS rate was 62%, median DMFS was not reached, and 2-y DMFS rate was 72% (Table). Sites of first recurrence in pts with distant recurrence (n = 41; 27%) were soft tissue (39%), lungs (34%), multiple organs (37%), skin (27%), liver (22%), lymph nodes (22%), bone (15%), brain (7%), intestines (5%), other visceral organs (17%), and other (2%). Subsequent tx was used in 51 pts (34%), including surgery (9%), radiotherapy (8%), and systemic tx (32% [adjuvant tx, 10%; unresectable/metastatic tx, 22%]). Median time from NIVO discontinuation (D/C) to subsequent tx was 12.6 mo. Grade 3/4 TRAEs occurred in 21 pts (14%). Any AEs led to tx D/C in 35 pts (23%). Late-emergent grade 3/4 TRAEs (100 d–2 y after tx) were reported in 3 pts (2%; 2 of 3 pts had prior TRAE occurrence). Table: 108P

Adjuvant NIVO (n = 152)
Median RFS, mo (95% CI) 47.2 (33.2–NR)
RFS rate, % (95% CI)
1 y 75 (67–81)
2 y 62 (54–70)
3 y 56 (46–65)
Recurrence, n (%) 59 (39)
Local 17 (11)
Regional 14 (9)
Distant 26 (17)
Died before recurrence, n (%) 3 (2)
Median DMFS, mo (95% CI) NR (45.7–NR)
DMFS rate, % (95% CI)
1 y 80 (73–86)
2 y 72 (64–79)
3 y 66 (57–74)
Distant recurrence, n (%) 41 (27)
Died before distant recurrence, n (%) 6 (4)

NR, not reached.

Conclusions

RW effectiveness and safety of adjuvant NIVO in pts with resected stage III/IV melanoma in PRESERV MEL were consistent with CheckMate 238 results.

Editorial acknowledgement

Medical writing support for the development of this abstract, under the direction of the authors, was provided by Mark Palangio of Ashfield MedComms, an Inizio company, and funded by Bristol Myers Squibb.

Legal entity responsible for the study

Bristol Myers Squibb.

Funding

Bristol Myers Squibb.

Disclosure

B. Neyns: Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pierre Fabre, MSD (Merck Sharp & Dohme); Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Novartis, Pfizer; Non-Financial Interests, Institutional, Product Samples: Bayer. L. McDonald: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Bristol Myers Squibb; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks or ownership: Bristol Myers Squibb. H. Van Campenhout: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Bristol Myers Squibb; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks or ownership: Bristol Myers Squibb. C. Jacobs: Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: BMS, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, MSD; Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker: BMS. A. Rogiers: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: MSD, BMS. A. Rorive: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: BMS, Novartis, MSD, Pierre Fabre; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: BMS, Novartis, MSD, Pierre Fabre. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.