Abstract 108P
Background
Adjuvant NIVO is approved for pts with melanoma with lymph node involvement/metastatic disease who have undergone complete resection. PRESERV MEL is an observational study aiming to describe effectiveness, safety, and quality of life in pts treated with adjuvant NIVO in the RW. Updated results are shown.
Methods
Pts were enrolled prospectively/retrospectively over a 2-y period and are being followed for 5 y. Index date was first NIVO administration. Pts received NIVO for ≤ 12 mo per label. Recurrence-free survival (RFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS; including baseline stage IV pts), time to discontinuation (TTD), subsequent treatment (tx), and adverse events (AEs)/tx-related AEs (TRAEs) were assessed.
Results
In total, 152 pts (125 prospective; 27 retrospective) were enrolled (Jan 2019–Dec 2020) at 15 sites in Belgium and Luxembourg. Median follow-up was 25 mo. Median TTD was 11.1 mo. All pts ended tx due to tx completion (56%), AE (23%), recurrence (15%), pt decision unrelated to AE (1%), or other reason (5%). Median RFS was 47.2 mo, 2-y RFS rate was 62%, median DMFS was not reached, and 2-y DMFS rate was 72% (Table). Sites of first recurrence in pts with distant recurrence (n = 41; 27%) were soft tissue (39%), lungs (34%), multiple organs (37%), skin (27%), liver (22%), lymph nodes (22%), bone (15%), brain (7%), intestines (5%), other visceral organs (17%), and other (2%). Subsequent tx was used in 51 pts (34%), including surgery (9%), radiotherapy (8%), and systemic tx (32% [adjuvant tx, 10%; unresectable/metastatic tx, 22%]). Median time from NIVO discontinuation (D/C) to subsequent tx was 12.6 mo. Grade 3/4 TRAEs occurred in 21 pts (14%). Any AEs led to tx D/C in 35 pts (23%). Late-emergent grade 3/4 TRAEs (100 d–2 y after tx) were reported in 3 pts (2%; 2 of 3 pts had prior TRAE occurrence). Table: 108P
Adjuvant NIVO (n = 152) | |
Median RFS, mo (95% CI) | 47.2 (33.2–NR) |
RFS rate, % (95% CI) | |
1 y | 75 (67–81) |
2 y | 62 (54–70) |
3 y | 56 (46–65) |
Recurrence, n (%) | 59 (39) |
Local | 17 (11) |
Regional | 14 (9) |
Distant | 26 (17) |
Died before recurrence, n (%) | 3 (2) |
Median DMFS, mo (95% CI) | NR (45.7–NR) |
DMFS rate, % (95% CI) | |
1 y | 80 (73–86) |
2 y | 72 (64–79) |
3 y | 66 (57–74) |
Distant recurrence, n (%) | 41 (27) |
Died before distant recurrence, n (%) | 6 (4) |
NR, not reached.
Conclusions
RW effectiveness and safety of adjuvant NIVO in pts with resected stage III/IV melanoma in PRESERV MEL were consistent with CheckMate 238 results.
Editorial acknowledgement
Medical writing support for the development of this abstract, under the direction of the authors, was provided by Mark Palangio of Ashfield MedComms, an Inizio company, and funded by Bristol Myers Squibb.
Legal entity responsible for the study
Bristol Myers Squibb.
Funding
Bristol Myers Squibb.
Disclosure
B. Neyns: Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pierre Fabre, MSD (Merck Sharp & Dohme); Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Novartis, Pfizer; Non-Financial Interests, Institutional, Product Samples: Bayer. L. McDonald: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Bristol Myers Squibb; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks or ownership: Bristol Myers Squibb. H. Van Campenhout: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Bristol Myers Squibb; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks or ownership: Bristol Myers Squibb. C. Jacobs: Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: BMS, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, MSD; Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker: BMS. A. Rogiers: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: MSD, BMS. A. Rorive: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: BMS, Novartis, MSD, Pierre Fabre; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: BMS, Novartis, MSD, Pierre Fabre. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
100P - Phase II trial of tislelizumab plus bevacizumab and chemotherapy as the first-line therapy for persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer: updated efficacy and safety results
Presenter: Jianqing Zhu
Session: Poster Display
101P - Progression-Free Survival is an acceptable surrogate endpoint for chemo-immunotherapy combinations in Cervical Carcinoma, an EORTC Young GCG study
Presenter: Ramon Yarza
Session: Poster Display
102P - Interim safety analysis of a phase 2 trial of cisplatin-sensitized radiation therapy and pembrolizumab for unresectable vulvar cancer
Presenter: Oladapo Yeku
Session: Poster Display
103P - Long-term survivorship rates among previously treated patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC) achieving objective response with nivolumab
Presenter: Saby George
Session: Poster Display
105P - Preliminary efficacy and safety results from ‘ReBirth’, a phase II study of risk-based bladder-sparing therapy for MIBC.
Presenter: Yijun Shen
Session: Poster Display
106P - Treatment Sequencing in PD-L1-Positive Recurrent/Metastatic (R/M) Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC): Exploratory Analysis of the Phase 3 KEYNOTE-048 Study
Presenter: Amanda Psyrri
Session: Poster Display
109P - Prognosis of patients with metastatic melanoma with initial stable disease during treatment with anti-PD-1 monotherapy
Presenter: Inge Noringriis
Session: Poster Display
110P - Outcomes of CUPem: A prospective Phase II multicentre clinical Trial of Pembrolizumab in patients with pre-treated Cancer of Unknown Primary
Presenter: Harpreet Wasan
Session: Poster Display
111P - Characteristics and outcomes of immunotherapy-related liver injury in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma compared to patients with advanced solid tumours
Presenter: Ciro Celsa
Session: Poster Display