Abstract 108P
Background
Adjuvant NIVO is approved for pts with melanoma with lymph node involvement/metastatic disease who have undergone complete resection. PRESERV MEL is an observational study aiming to describe effectiveness, safety, and quality of life in pts treated with adjuvant NIVO in the RW. Updated results are shown.
Methods
Pts were enrolled prospectively/retrospectively over a 2-y period and are being followed for 5 y. Index date was first NIVO administration. Pts received NIVO for ≤ 12 mo per label. Recurrence-free survival (RFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS; including baseline stage IV pts), time to discontinuation (TTD), subsequent treatment (tx), and adverse events (AEs)/tx-related AEs (TRAEs) were assessed.
Results
In total, 152 pts (125 prospective; 27 retrospective) were enrolled (Jan 2019–Dec 2020) at 15 sites in Belgium and Luxembourg. Median follow-up was 25 mo. Median TTD was 11.1 mo. All pts ended tx due to tx completion (56%), AE (23%), recurrence (15%), pt decision unrelated to AE (1%), or other reason (5%). Median RFS was 47.2 mo, 2-y RFS rate was 62%, median DMFS was not reached, and 2-y DMFS rate was 72% (Table). Sites of first recurrence in pts with distant recurrence (n = 41; 27%) were soft tissue (39%), lungs (34%), multiple organs (37%), skin (27%), liver (22%), lymph nodes (22%), bone (15%), brain (7%), intestines (5%), other visceral organs (17%), and other (2%). Subsequent tx was used in 51 pts (34%), including surgery (9%), radiotherapy (8%), and systemic tx (32% [adjuvant tx, 10%; unresectable/metastatic tx, 22%]). Median time from NIVO discontinuation (D/C) to subsequent tx was 12.6 mo. Grade 3/4 TRAEs occurred in 21 pts (14%). Any AEs led to tx D/C in 35 pts (23%). Late-emergent grade 3/4 TRAEs (100 d–2 y after tx) were reported in 3 pts (2%; 2 of 3 pts had prior TRAE occurrence). Table: 108P
Adjuvant NIVO (n = 152) | |
Median RFS, mo (95% CI) | 47.2 (33.2–NR) |
RFS rate, % (95% CI) | |
1 y | 75 (67–81) |
2 y | 62 (54–70) |
3 y | 56 (46–65) |
Recurrence, n (%) | 59 (39) |
Local | 17 (11) |
Regional | 14 (9) |
Distant | 26 (17) |
Died before recurrence, n (%) | 3 (2) |
Median DMFS, mo (95% CI) | NR (45.7–NR) |
DMFS rate, % (95% CI) | |
1 y | 80 (73–86) |
2 y | 72 (64–79) |
3 y | 66 (57–74) |
Distant recurrence, n (%) | 41 (27) |
Died before distant recurrence, n (%) | 6 (4) |
NR, not reached.
Conclusions
RW effectiveness and safety of adjuvant NIVO in pts with resected stage III/IV melanoma in PRESERV MEL were consistent with CheckMate 238 results.
Editorial acknowledgement
Medical writing support for the development of this abstract, under the direction of the authors, was provided by Mark Palangio of Ashfield MedComms, an Inizio company, and funded by Bristol Myers Squibb.
Legal entity responsible for the study
Bristol Myers Squibb.
Funding
Bristol Myers Squibb.
Disclosure
B. Neyns: Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pierre Fabre, MSD (Merck Sharp & Dohme); Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Novartis, Pfizer; Non-Financial Interests, Institutional, Product Samples: Bayer. L. McDonald: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Bristol Myers Squibb; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks or ownership: Bristol Myers Squibb. H. Van Campenhout: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Bristol Myers Squibb; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks or ownership: Bristol Myers Squibb. C. Jacobs: Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: BMS, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, MSD; Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker: BMS. A. Rogiers: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: MSD, BMS. A. Rorive: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: BMS, Novartis, MSD, Pierre Fabre; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: BMS, Novartis, MSD, Pierre Fabre. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
90P - HAIC plus sintilimab and bevacizumab biosimilar as treatment for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): a phase II trial
Presenter: HAIBIN ZHANG
Session: Poster Display
91P - A real-world study of tislelizumab (Anti-PD-1) plus tyrosine kinase inhibitors for intermediate or advanced hepatocellular carcinoma
Presenter: Wei zhang
Session: Poster Display
92P - TAE-HAIC plus lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitors versus TAE-HAIC plus atezolizumab and bevacizumab for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A propensity score matching study
Presenter: hongjie Cai
Session: Poster Display
93P - The survival impact of the addition of durvalumab to cisplatin/gemcitabine in advanced biliary tract cancer: a real-world, retrospective, multicentric study.
Presenter: Margherita Rimini
Session: Poster Display
94P - First-line chemotherapy plus immunotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for advanced gallbladder carcinoma
Presenter: Qin-qin Liu
Session: Poster Display
95P - A single-arm, multicenter phase ? trial evaluating TQB2450 plus anlotinib combined with paclitaxel and cisplatin in first-line treatment of advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC)
Presenter: Junsheng Wang
Session: Poster Display
97P - ICI for patients with MSS metastatic colorectal cancer
Presenter: Zayana Sangadzhieva
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
99P - Efficacy and safety of toripalimab plus metronomic chemotherapy in HER2 negative metastatic breast cancer
Presenter: Hongnan Mo
Session: Poster Display