Abstract 825P
Background
MRD assessment in bone marrow (BM-MRD) is a relevant prognostic factor in multiple myeloma (MM). However, MRD is an established test in MM clinical trials but not in routine practice. Less invasive methods to monitor MRD in peripheral blood (PB) could facilitate its implementation.
Methods
This study enrolled 243 patients monitored in PETHEMA/GEM clinical trials. In all, BM-MRD was processed using NGF. In 83 patients, PB-MRD was examined in cell-free DNA (cfDNA) using CloneSight, a highly sensitive (>10-4) NGS method based on patient-specific multiplexed amplicon mini-panels covering somatic mutations identified at diagnosis. PB-MRD was then evaluated by BloodFlow, another high-sensitive method (10-7) that combines immunomagnetic enrichment with NGF.
Results
CloneSight was performed in 83 patients, 9 were excluded due to lack of suitable somatic mutations for PB-MRD tracking. A total of 194 samples were studied, 12 (6%) were PB-MRD positive, from 9 of the 74 (12%) patients. In 166 samples, BM-MRD was simultaneously analyzed using NGF. The concordance between PB-MRD using CloneSight and BM-MRD by NGF was 67% (62% double negative and 5% double positive). The frequency of CloneSight-/NGF+ and CloneSight+/NGF- discordant assessments was 31% and 2% respectively. Of note, only 3 of the 74 (4%) MRD negative patients relapsed thus far. Upon analyzing PB-MRD with both methods described, another 4/74 patients were CloneSight-/BloodFlow+, of whom 1 progressed. Of note, the only case being CloneSight+/BloodFlow- relapsed. The negative predictive value (NPV) of PB-MRD using BloodFlow was about 80%. CloneSight also offered a high PPV of 100%. The landmark median PFS of patients with negative vs positive PB-MRD using CloneSight was NR vs 14 months, respectively (HR:11.7, P<.001).
Conclusions
CloneSight and BloodFlow are empowered to assess PB-MRD with high sensitivity based on the respective detection of cfDNA and circulating tumor cells (CTCs). Presence of mutations and CTCs was associated with a shorter PFS. The high PPV achieved indicates that identification of such events in the group of BM-MRD-positive patients could stratify those at immediate risk of relapse.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1182P - Determination of tumor PSMA expression in prostate cancer from blood using a novel epigenomic liquid biopsy platform
Presenter: Praful Ravi
Session: Poster session 09
1183P - Impact of multicancer early detection (MCED) test on participant-reported outcomes (PRO) and behavioral intentions by cancer risk
Presenter: Christina Dilaveri
Session: Poster session 09
1184P - Early real-world experience with positive multi-cancer early detection (MCED) test cases and negative initial diagnostic work-up
Presenter: Candace Westgate
Session: Poster session 09
1185P - Clinical applications of a novel blood-based fragmentomics assay for lung cancer detection
Presenter: Marc Siegel
Session: Poster session 09
1186P - SmartCS-LPLLM: Enhancing early cancer detection through ctDNA methylation analysis leveraging large language models
Presenter: Li Chao
Session: Poster session 09
1187P - Molecular diagnosis of lung cancer via ctDNA and ctRNA detection on bronchoscopic fluid specimens from 31 patients: A retrospective analysis
Presenter: Vincent Fallet
Session: Poster session 09
1188P - Modeled economic and clinical impact of a multi-cancer early detection (MCED) test in a population with hereditary cancer syndromes
Presenter: Sana Raoof
Session: Poster session 09
1189P - Cancer genome interpreter: A data-driven tool for tumor mutation interpretation
Presenter: Santiago Demajo
Session: Poster session 09
1190P - Circulating tumor DNA from the tumor-draining pulmonary vein as a biomarker in resected non-small cell lung cancer
Presenter: Raphael Werner
Session: Poster session 09
1191P - Efficient lung cancer stage prediction and outcome informatics with Bayesian deep learning and MCMC method
Presenter: Maria Gkotzamanidou
Session: Poster session 09