Abstract 825P
Background
MRD assessment in bone marrow (BM-MRD) is a relevant prognostic factor in multiple myeloma (MM). However, MRD is an established test in MM clinical trials but not in routine practice. Less invasive methods to monitor MRD in peripheral blood (PB) could facilitate its implementation.
Methods
This study enrolled 243 patients monitored in PETHEMA/GEM clinical trials. In all, BM-MRD was processed using NGF. In 83 patients, PB-MRD was examined in cell-free DNA (cfDNA) using CloneSight, a highly sensitive (>10-4) NGS method based on patient-specific multiplexed amplicon mini-panels covering somatic mutations identified at diagnosis. PB-MRD was then evaluated by BloodFlow, another high-sensitive method (10-7) that combines immunomagnetic enrichment with NGF.
Results
CloneSight was performed in 83 patients, 9 were excluded due to lack of suitable somatic mutations for PB-MRD tracking. A total of 194 samples were studied, 12 (6%) were PB-MRD positive, from 9 of the 74 (12%) patients. In 166 samples, BM-MRD was simultaneously analyzed using NGF. The concordance between PB-MRD using CloneSight and BM-MRD by NGF was 67% (62% double negative and 5% double positive). The frequency of CloneSight-/NGF+ and CloneSight+/NGF- discordant assessments was 31% and 2% respectively. Of note, only 3 of the 74 (4%) MRD negative patients relapsed thus far. Upon analyzing PB-MRD with both methods described, another 4/74 patients were CloneSight-/BloodFlow+, of whom 1 progressed. Of note, the only case being CloneSight+/BloodFlow- relapsed. The negative predictive value (NPV) of PB-MRD using BloodFlow was about 80%. CloneSight also offered a high PPV of 100%. The landmark median PFS of patients with negative vs positive PB-MRD using CloneSight was NR vs 14 months, respectively (HR:11.7, P<.001).
Conclusions
CloneSight and BloodFlow are empowered to assess PB-MRD with high sensitivity based on the respective detection of cfDNA and circulating tumor cells (CTCs). Presence of mutations and CTCs was associated with a shorter PFS. The high PPV achieved indicates that identification of such events in the group of BM-MRD-positive patients could stratify those at immediate risk of relapse.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1192P - Optimizing lung cancer screening: Independent verification of an AI/ML computer-aided detection and characterization software as medical device
Presenter: Sylvain Bodard
Session: Poster session 09
1194P - Development of a novel artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm to detect pulmonary nodules on chest radiography
Presenter: Mitsunori Higuchi
Session: Poster session 09
1195P - Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) screening in Li Fraumeni syndrome for early cancer diagnosis: The SIGNIFIED project
Presenter: Elena Cojocaru
Session: Poster session 09
1196P - Organoid growth-based oncological sensitivity test (OncoSensi) for predicting adjuvant therapy outcomes in ovarian cancer patients
Presenter: Dong Woo Lee
Session: Poster session 09
1197P - Ex vivo basket study reports patient-specific sensitivity to carboplatin versus cisplatin in lung, ovarian and bladder cancer
Presenter: Debbie Robbrecht
Session: Poster session 09
1198P - Analytical validation of an NGS panel-based ecDNA detection device for use as a clinical trial assay for the POTENTIATE clinical study of the novel CHK1 inhibitor, BBI-355
Presenter: Pontis Julien
Session: Poster session 09