Abstract 825P
Background
MRD assessment in bone marrow (BM-MRD) is a relevant prognostic factor in multiple myeloma (MM). However, MRD is an established test in MM clinical trials but not in routine practice. Less invasive methods to monitor MRD in peripheral blood (PB) could facilitate its implementation.
Methods
This study enrolled 243 patients monitored in PETHEMA/GEM clinical trials. In all, BM-MRD was processed using NGF. In 83 patients, PB-MRD was examined in cell-free DNA (cfDNA) using CloneSight, a highly sensitive (>10-4) NGS method based on patient-specific multiplexed amplicon mini-panels covering somatic mutations identified at diagnosis. PB-MRD was then evaluated by BloodFlow, another high-sensitive method (10-7) that combines immunomagnetic enrichment with NGF.
Results
CloneSight was performed in 83 patients, 9 were excluded due to lack of suitable somatic mutations for PB-MRD tracking. A total of 194 samples were studied, 12 (6%) were PB-MRD positive, from 9 of the 74 (12%) patients. In 166 samples, BM-MRD was simultaneously analyzed using NGF. The concordance between PB-MRD using CloneSight and BM-MRD by NGF was 67% (62% double negative and 5% double positive). The frequency of CloneSight-/NGF+ and CloneSight+/NGF- discordant assessments was 31% and 2% respectively. Of note, only 3 of the 74 (4%) MRD negative patients relapsed thus far. Upon analyzing PB-MRD with both methods described, another 4/74 patients were CloneSight-/BloodFlow+, of whom 1 progressed. Of note, the only case being CloneSight+/BloodFlow- relapsed. The negative predictive value (NPV) of PB-MRD using BloodFlow was about 80%. CloneSight also offered a high PPV of 100%. The landmark median PFS of patients with negative vs positive PB-MRD using CloneSight was NR vs 14 months, respectively (HR:11.7, P<.001).
Conclusions
CloneSight and BloodFlow are empowered to assess PB-MRD with high sensitivity based on the respective detection of cfDNA and circulating tumor cells (CTCs). Presence of mutations and CTCs was associated with a shorter PFS. The high PPV achieved indicates that identification of such events in the group of BM-MRD-positive patients could stratify those at immediate risk of relapse.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
224P - Lung cancer scRNA-seq analyses reveal potential mechanisms causing different efficacy of target therapy and immunotherapy between EGFR 19del and L858R lung adenocarcinoma
Presenter: Hao Wang
Session: Poster session 09
225P - Nivolumab for cancer of unknown primary (CUP): Clinical efficacy and biomarker analysis from NivoCUP2 expanded access program (WJOG14620M)
Presenter: Junko Tanizaki
Session: Poster session 09
226TiP - CLEAR-Me: Interception trial to detect and clear molecular residual disease in patients with high-risk melanoma
Presenter: Erick Saldanha
Session: Poster session 09
227TiP - A phase II, open label, randomized, non-comparative cohorts study of adjuvant atezolizumab or atezolizumab plus tiragolumab in solid tumors with resectable disease with intermediate-high risk of recurrence and high tumor mutational burden (TMB-H) or microsatellite instability (MSI-H)
Presenter: Guillermo Antonio De Velasco Oria
Session: Poster session 09
228TiP - FINPROVE: The Finnish national study to facilitate patient access to targeted anti-cancer drugs
Presenter: Mika Mustonen
Session: Poster session 09
229TiP - A phase II trial of a neural network-based treatment decision support tool in patients (pts) with refractory solid organ malignancies
Presenter: Robert Walsh
Session: Poster session 09
230TiP - Exploring mechanisms of action and resistance in innovate cancer therapies: The UNLOCK program
Presenter: Beatriz Alonso de Castro
Session: Poster session 09
694P - Sequential high-dose-chemotherapy with 4 cycles paclitaxel, ifosfamide, carboplatin, etoposide (P-ICE) in relapsed/refractory male germ cell cancer: Final results with 15.8 years follow-up
Presenter: Hans Joachim Schmoll
Session: Poster session 09
695P - Assessment of the utility of CT scans in the long-term follow-up of metastatic non-seminomatous germ cell tumours (mNSGCT): The Late CT study
Presenter: Deep Chakrabarti
Session: Poster session 09
696P - Post chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (PC-RPLND) for metastatic pure seminoma
Presenter: David Pfister
Session: Poster session 09