Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 11

1708P - The clinical value of tumor-informed minimal residual disease detection in renal cell carcinoma

Date

14 Sep 2024

Session

Poster session 11

Topics

Genetic and Genomic Testing

Tumour Site

Renal Cell Cancer

Presenters

linhui wang

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_2): S1012-S1030. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1609

Authors

L. wang1, X. gan1, F. Huang1, J. Ding1, Q. Hao2, K. Wang3

Author affiliations

  • 1 Urology Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University/Changhai Hospital of Shanghai, 200433 - Shanghai/CN
  • 2 Medical Product, OrigiMed Shanghai, 201112 - shanghai/CN
  • 3 Medical Product, OrigiMed Shanghai, 201112 - Shanghai/CN

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1708P

Background

Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is one of the most lethal urological malignancies with high tumor heterogeneity, and reliable biomarkers are still needed for its diagnosis and prognosis. Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) as a prognostic marker in ccRCC remain undetermined.

Methods

Tumor tissue samples were used for whole exome sequencing (WES) and clonal mutations were selected for the customized MRD panel. Blood samples were collected for MRD detection both preoperatively (within 24 hours before surgery) and at multiple postoperative time points including 1, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, and 36 months.

Results

A total of 70 ccRCC patients including 51 (72.9%) males and 19 (27.1%) females, with a median age of 56 years old (23-78 years old). Based on WES, we found that 64% (4936/7715) of the mutated genes were unique to each patient with ccRCC, and 95.5% (2148/2249) of selected tumor-informed single nucleotide variants (SNV) were variants with unknown significance, suggesting that tumor-informed MRD is superior to panel-based MRD in ccRCC. The positive rates of MRD preoperatively, and at 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, and 18 months postoperatively were 49.2% (32/65), 5% (3/60), 7% (3/43), 4.8% (1/21), and 10% (1/10), respectively. Based on the pathological staging (pT1-2, pT3, pT4), the preoperative MRD positivity rates for patients were 39.1% (18/46), 72.2% (13/18), and 100% (1/1), respectively. The respective negative and positive predictive values (NPV and PPV) of MRD testing were 100% (63/63) and 42.9% (3/7). Due to the follow-up time is relatively short (median = 263 days), only three patients have experienced recurrence and metastasis, and there was one additional patient with suspected recurrence among the MRD-positive population.Patient follow-up is still ongoing.

Conclusions

This study suggests that tumor-informed MRD may be superior to panel-based MRD in ccRCC. Despite the short follow-up, MRD demonstrates potential in predicting recurrence and metastasis. With NPV and PPV at 100% and 42.9% respectively, the importance of continuous MRD monitoring for long-term prognosis assessment is underscored.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

Linhui Wang.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.