Abstract 1708P
Background
Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is one of the most lethal urological malignancies with high tumor heterogeneity, and reliable biomarkers are still needed for its diagnosis and prognosis. Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) as a prognostic marker in ccRCC remain undetermined.
Methods
Tumor tissue samples were used for whole exome sequencing (WES) and clonal mutations were selected for the customized MRD panel. Blood samples were collected for MRD detection both preoperatively (within 24 hours before surgery) and at multiple postoperative time points including 1, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, and 36 months.
Results
A total of 70 ccRCC patients including 51 (72.9%) males and 19 (27.1%) females, with a median age of 56 years old (23-78 years old). Based on WES, we found that 64% (4936/7715) of the mutated genes were unique to each patient with ccRCC, and 95.5% (2148/2249) of selected tumor-informed single nucleotide variants (SNV) were variants with unknown significance, suggesting that tumor-informed MRD is superior to panel-based MRD in ccRCC. The positive rates of MRD preoperatively, and at 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, and 18 months postoperatively were 49.2% (32/65), 5% (3/60), 7% (3/43), 4.8% (1/21), and 10% (1/10), respectively. Based on the pathological staging (pT1-2, pT3, pT4), the preoperative MRD positivity rates for patients were 39.1% (18/46), 72.2% (13/18), and 100% (1/1), respectively. The respective negative and positive predictive values (NPV and PPV) of MRD testing were 100% (63/63) and 42.9% (3/7). Due to the follow-up time is relatively short (median = 263 days), only three patients have experienced recurrence and metastasis, and there was one additional patient with suspected recurrence among the MRD-positive population.Patient follow-up is still ongoing.
Conclusions
This study suggests that tumor-informed MRD may be superior to panel-based MRD in ccRCC. Despite the short follow-up, MRD demonstrates potential in predicting recurrence and metastasis. With NPV and PPV at 100% and 42.9% respectively, the importance of continuous MRD monitoring for long-term prognosis assessment is underscored.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Linhui Wang.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1627P - Long survivors after androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with or without docetaxel for metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC): Long-term follow-up of GETUG-15
Presenter: Sarah Blanchet-Deverly
Session: Poster session 11
1628P - Factors influencing clinical and biological response in patients treated with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 under France's early access program
Presenter: Vincent Habouzit
Session: Poster session 11
1629P - Lutetium-177–prostate-specific membrane antigen (177Lu-PSMA) therapy in patients (pts) with prior Radium-223 (223Ra)
Presenter: Kambiz Rahbar
Session: Poster session 11
1630P - A multicenter retrospective study on the efficacy of anti-PD-(L)1 in microsatellite unstable (MSI-H) metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)
Presenter: Sandra Van Wilpe
Session: Poster session 11
1632P - Impact of androgen pathway inhibitors on cognitive function in elderly patients with metastatic prostate cancer: Results from the COG-PRO trial
Presenter: Antoine Boué
Session: Poster session 11
1634P - Does lower serum testosterone predict metastases-free survival in nmCRPC patients treated with novel antiandrogens? A post-hoc analysis of SPARTAN and ARAMIS
Presenter: Xudong Ni
Session: Poster session 11
1635P - Validation of automated bone scan index as a progression endpoint in two phase III studies of metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients
Presenter: Andrea Knezevic
Session: Poster session 11